2011-02-04 Cable illuminates why Yemenis engaged in "Day of Rage" [UPDATE]

While Egyptians continue to maintain their uprising against President Hosni Mubarak with a “Day of Departure" today, it is worth looking at what happened in Yemen yesterday. An opposition coalition of Yemenis mobilized in defiance of a plea from President Ali Abdullah Saleh to not protest, rally or engage in any sit-ins, and held their own "Day of Rage."

The protests were considered to be the largest anti-government demonstration that Saleh has “faced in his 32-year rule.” The Guardian reported protesters chanted, “Together we fight against poverty, corruption and injustice.” Given what has been happening in Egypt, the protesters hoped to mobilize in their Tahrir Square, but the government “beat them” to the Square and sent “hundreds of tribesmen to camp out there overnight.”

Protesters called for Saleh to “form a new government” and “let the Yemeni people decide who will rule them in clean, fair elections.”

WikiLeaks cables released on February 3 reveal why Yemenis might be mounting a revolution. In cable 05SANAA1790 from June 28, 2005, called “Priorities for Washington Visit: Saleh Needs to Be Part of the Solution.” A section on “Democratic Elections” is particularly illuminating:

Saleh touts Yemen as a leader in regional reform and has committed to democratization. Domestically, however, he has run-out of reforms he can implement at no political cost to himself. Increasingly anxious about upcoming Presidential elections, and already preoccupied with succession, it is unlikely Saleh will allow a viable opposition candidate to challenge him in 2006. The visit is an opportunity to pressure Saleh not to amend the constitution so he may run again in 2013 by praising him for bringing Yemen to the point where he can rely on the system in place to produce a legitimate successor. The inducement here might be a public show of support via a greater role in public fora such as the G-8.

The cable points to “significant progress” in the U.S. relationship with Yemen. The progress referred to seems solely contingent on Yemen’s ability to counter “terrorism” or al Qaeda elements in the country:

Significant progress has been made in our relationship with Yemen in the past four years. The ROYG has arrested and tried perpetrators of the USS Cole and VM Limburg attacks, shared GWOT-related information, collaborated in the capture of AQ suspects and helped uncover plots against U.S. and other western interests in Yemen. On the economic and political reform front, Yemen has conducted reasonably free and fair Parliamentary and local council elections, taken an active role in regional and international democratic reform efforts, including BMENA and the Community of Democracies; backed IMF/WB sponsored economic reforms, and committed to seeking MCC membership.

However, it appears the US overlooked the magnitude of poverty and state repression in the country, as there is no prediction on whether the people might rise up in opposition to Saleh.

The Millennium Challenge Corporation (MCC) membership cited is “a U.S. Government agency that works with developing countries for the promotion of good governance, economic freedom and investment, in this instance, through its Millennium Challenge Threshold Program.” The program has tried for the past five years to award $20 million in grant funding to Yemen but has postponed the award at least twice because Yemen was found to not be meeting a number of “thresholds.”

According to the Center for Global Development, in Fiscal Year 2009, it failed to meet the “threshold” for five of the six “Ruling Justly” categories. It passed the “threshold” for control of corruption but failed the “thresholds” for political rights, civil liberties, government effectiveness, rule of law and voice and accountability.

It failed all six of the “Investing in People” categories: immunization rates, health expenditures, primary education expenditures, girls’ primary education completion, and natural resources management. It passed three “thresholds” in three of the “Economic Freedom” categories—land rights and access, trade policy and inflation—but failed to meet the regulatory quality, business start-up and fiscal policy “thresholds.”

The Center notes, "On November 28, 2005, Yemen became the first country suspended by the MCC for a deterioration in performance, as measured by the indicators." More than half of a decade later, Yemen is still doing an abysmal job of ruling justly and investing in its people and that is why Yemenis (like other countries in North Africa and the Middle East) are revolting against their government.

For more on cables from Yemen, here is part 2, which looks at US military aid and the Yemen government.

Cable Contents Again Demonstrate High Value of WikiLeaks

[This is a 2nd attempt, now containing only 1 link which hopefully gets accepted by this website's spam filter.]

Once again the contents of these cables show the high worth of WikiLeaks. It has made it possible for vast numbers of people to become aware of the details of the huge numbers of government created/manipulated/instigated/enabled/approved/etc. instances of harm-initiation to individuals within and beyond their own self-defined jurisdiction.

While most people around the world are riveted to various media for up-to-the-minute information about the latest protests against governments in various areas, how many are aiding WikiLeaks in their efforts to continue to be this conduit of information? And how many - especially the large numbers of liberty-promoting writers abounding on the Internet - are non-contradictory in their vocal/written support? Or how many are like the prolific libertarian blogger who responded publicly with obvious guilt pangs to my article, "Are Principles Unaffordable?" that pointed out the inconsistency of writing words of support but continuing to use use private services of corporations that are *working with* government to destroy WikiLeaks - by acceding to government suggestions or hints rather than (ie. PayPal, MasterCard and Visa) requiring the government to get a court to *order them* to refuse to transfer customer money and for Amazon to terminate the hosting service for WikiLeaks - and then the article provided financial transfer alternatives. This blogger publicly responded with her own contradictions, deficiencies and evasions both in her original rebut,"More pure than thou", and in her responses to me in our online dialog. This last link contains links to the original articles by me and Claire Wolfe.

So let's see more consistency in supporting WikiLeaks from more people! Maybe more of the mostly consistently reasoning commenters on this subject at various bloggers' sites will question the writers' practices. Are they still using the above corporations?? And will they use others who follow the same government complicity role?? By doing so such commenters could be instrumental in changing the behavior of the writers rather than simply being mostly passive and/or agreeable.

WikiLeaks is a make/break issue (one of critical and great importance) and being able to determine (critically analyze)to determine which are and also understand that principles really do matter and are affordable is all essential to liberty-promoting bloggers/writers and their readers.

Theme by Danetsoft and Danang Probo Sayekti inspired by Maksimer