News Archive - 2012-07 (July 2012)

2012-07-01 WikiLeaks News Update: WikiLeaks releases fundraising CD; U.S. admits ongoing investigation




WikiLeaks has been financially blockaded without process for 575 days.
Julian Assange has been detained without charge for 572 days.
Bradley Manning has been imprisoned without trial for 769 days.
A secret Grand Jury has been active in the U.S. without transparency for 655 days.


WikiLeaks News:

  • WikiLeaks released a downloadable CD, "Beat the Blockade", as a way of raising funds for the organisation. The CD is a collection of songs from supporters. It costs $11.99, or $24.99 for those who wish to offer an extra donation. All proceeds go to WikiLeaks and the Bradley Manning Defence Fund.

Image

  • A $1.2 billion jump in U.S. secrecy spending last year is likely in response to the major WikiLeaks disclosures of 2010.
  • Jacob Appelbaum is calling on people to request anything they can under the Freedom of Information Act regarding the "WikiLeaks Persons At Risk Taskforce" and disclose the results. The Twitter hashtag for WikiLeaks-related FOIA information is #WLFOIA.
  • Partick Cockburn at The Independent wrote an op-ed about the accomplishments of WikiLeaks and how media has tried to downplay its importance through attacking Julian Assange.
  • Due to the fact that OpenLeaks has not updated their website since 2011, their Wikipedia article has been deleted and merged with that of Daniel Domscheit-berg.
  • A new Twitter account, @OzWLNews, has been created to cover Australia-related WikiLeaks news.


Julian Assange News:

  • Julian Assange's 41st birthday is on July 3. We at WL Central have been collecting people's greetings via Twitter hashtag #JA41 and email ja41[at]wlcentral[dot]org. There is still time to get your birthday greeting in!
  • Julian Assange remains under the protection of the Ecuadorian Government at the Embassy in London while he awaits a decision on his application for political asylum. He was requested to surrender at the Metropolitan Police Station on June 29, but remained at the Embassy, explaining in a statement that "under both international and domestic UK law asylum assessments take priority over extradition claims ". Ecuadorian President Rafael Correa, in his most recent statements, said they are currently "analyzing the case with full responsibility and, as we have said a thousand times, we have no deadline to make a decision". For in-depth and continued coverage of Mr Assange's asylum bid, see our live-blog.

World Tomorrow banner

  • The final episode of The World Tomorrow will feature former Malaysian Deputy Prime Minister and current Leader of the Opposition, Anwar Ibrahim. The episode airs Tuesday, July 3, at 12:30PM BST on RT.
  • Melbourne held a huge rally in support of Julian Assange with many speakers and a special live performance from Rap News. A collection of photos from the event is available.
  • iMediaEthics did an in-depth analysis of eight corrections that McClatchy made regarding the fact that Julian Assange has not been charged with any crime.


Bradley Manning News:

  • The Bradley Manning Support Network published detailed notes from Bradley's June 25 motion hearing.
  • Queer Friends of Bradley Manning will be marching at World Pride in London, July 7.
  • The Bradley Manning Support Network has information on how to join in support for Bradley's next hearings, July 16-20.



............................................

Upcoming Dates & Events:

July 1: Rally for Julian Assange at the Swedish Consulate in Frankfurt, Germany, 3PM.

July 3: Julian Assange's 41st birthday.

July 3: The World Tomorrow's 12th and final episode airs, featuring Anwar Ibrahim.

July 7: Queer Friends of Bradley Manning will be marching at World Pride in London.

July 14: Global for Julian Assange Day.

July 16 - 20: Bradley Manning pre-trial hearings.

August 27 - 31: Bradley Manning pre-trial hearings.

September 19 - 20: Bradley Manning pre-trial hearings.

November 2012 ~ January 2013: Estimated time frame for Bradley Manning's court martial.

2012-07-01 [Archive] Live Blog: Assange requests political asylum from Ecuador

WikiLeaks announced via Twitter on the evening of June 19 (19:40 local time) that Julian Assange has requested political asylum at the Ecuadorian embassy in London.

WL Central has been running a live-blog since the announcement. For the most recent coverage, see http://wlcentral.org/asylum.

2012-06-19 Live Blog: Assange requests political asylum from Ecuador (Archive - Day 1)

This is part of our live-coverage on Julian Assange's request for political asylum. The most recent news is available here. See the archives for coverage of previous days.

Follow @wl_central on Twitter for all the latest updates.

WikiLeaks announced via Twitter on the evening of June 19 (19:40 local time) that Julian Assange has requested political asylum at the Ecuadorian embassy in London.

This comes after the UK Supreme Court refused a submission to reopen his case on June 14. Julian Assange has spent 560 days under house arrest without charge. His extradition to Sweden is set between June 28 and July 7.

Mr Assange will remain at the embassy under the protection of the Ecuadorian government while they process his request.

In his statement to the Diplomatic Mission of Ecuador, Julian Assange commented on his abandonment by his home country, Australia, as well as the threat of the death penalty in the U.S.

Ecuador offered political asylum to Julian Assange in November 2010. At that time, Vice Chancellor Kintto Lucas stated, "We are open to grant him Ecuadorian residency, without any kind of problem or any kind of conditions." (President Rafeal Correa afterwards stated the offer was not official.)

Ecuadorian President Rafael Correa was a guest on Julian Assange's talk show "The World Tomorrow" this past May. The full interview is available online in English, Spanish, Italian, Russian, and Arabic.

Updates will be added as they become available.

............................................

[UPDATE: 23:10 BST] Glenn Greenwald has written an article covering Julian Assange's decision to seek political asylum in Ecuador. Kevin Gosztola has also covered it.

Mr Assange's mother, Christine, has come out in support of his decision to seek asylum, saying it shows clear thinking, but also comments she had no prior notice.

SwedenvsAssange tweeted the following in support of his decision:

You can only request political asylum if you are free to walk into an Embassy. In Sweden Assange would not be able to exercise his right.

RT America has also reported on the news. Watch their coverage below:

[UPDATE: 21:33 BST] Jesselyn Radack of the Government Accountability Project and Barrett Brown will also be on RT to discuss Mr Assange's request for political asylum.

Media currently outside Ecuadorian embassy waiting for Julian Assange (image via RT London).

[UPDATE: 21:29 BST] Clark Stoeckley of the WikiLeaks Truck and Venezuelan author Eva Golinger will be on RT to discuss Julian Assange and his request for political asylum.

[UPDATE: 21:25 BST] Julian Assange's U.S. based lawyer Michael Ratner commented on the request via Twitter:

Julian's asylum not about questioning in Sweden. Facing life in solitary in US with no comm.for exposing war crimes, What Would You Do???
Sweden easier. Smaller. lawyers in UK remarkable. More public support. He would be in jail in Sweden, US lodges warrant and he never is out

2012-06-20 Live Blog: Assange requests political asylum from Ecuador (Archive - Day 2)

This is part of our live-coverage on Julian Assange's request for political asylum. The most recent news is available here. See the archives for coverage of previous days.

Follow @wl_central on Twitter for all the latest updates.

WikiLeaks announced via Twitter on the evening of June 19 (19:40 local time) that Julian Assange has requested political asylum at the Ecuadorian embassy in London.

This comes after the UK Supreme Court refused a submission to reopen his case on June 14. Julian Assange has spent 560 days under house arrest without charge. His extradition to Sweden is set between June 28 and July 7.

Mr Assange will remain at the embassy under the protection of the Ecuadorian government while they process his request.

In his statement to the Diplomatic Mission of Ecuador, Julian Assange commented on his abandonment by his home country, Australia, as well as the threat of the death penalty in the U.S.

Ecuador offered political asylum to Julian Assange in November 2010. At that time, Vice Chancellor Kintto Lucas stated, "We are open to grant him Ecuadorian residency, without any kind of problem or any kind of conditions." (President Rafeal Correa afterwards stated the offer was not official.)

Ecuadorian President Rafael Correa was a guest on Julian Assange's talk show "The World Tomorrow" this past May. The full interview is available online in English, Spanish, Italian, Russian, and Arabic.

Updates will be added as they become available.

............................................

[UPDATE: 22:33 BST] Daniel Ellsberg has come out in support of Julian Assange's decision to seek asylum. He stated:

Political asylum was made for cases like this. Freedom for Julian in Ecuador would serve the cause of freedom of speech and of the press worldwide. It would be good for us all; and it would be cause to honor, respect and thank Ecuador.

Others who have come out in support of Mr Assange's decision include Coleen Rowley and Ray McGovern.

[UPDATE: 22:05 BST] A petition has been started in support of Julian Assange's request for asylum. It also asks that the U.S. does not intervene if Ecuador accepts his application. Currently it has 1,200 signatories.

A second petition is also available at RootsAction.

A vigil for Mr Assange was held in front of the DFAT in Brisbane, June 20th. A rally is also taking place at the DFAT in Sydney on June 21st, 5-7PM.

[UPDATE: 20:25 BST] Kier Simmons of ITV News spoke with Kristinn Hrafnsson. According to him, Julian Assange will be spending another night at the Ecuadorian Embassy.

Jason Farrell of Sky News also spoke with Mr Hrafnsson and will have more information shortly.

Australian journalist Mary Kostakidis wrote to the Ecuadorian Embassy expressing her concern for Julian Assange and asking that Ecuador grant him asylum.

[UPDATE: 18:20 BST] Kristinn Hrafnsson has come out from the Ecuadorian Embassy and is currently speaking with the media. (image via @trh_humunculus)
Image

[UPDATE: 17:50 BST] Jesselyn Radack from the Government Accountability Project was on RT discussing Julian Assange's application for asylum. She discusses the real risks he faces in the U.S., where the Obama Administration has been waging a "war on whistleblowers".

[UPDATE: 16:10 BST] WikiLeaks spokesman Kristinn Hrafnsson has arrived. at the Ecuadorian Embassy.

Julian Assange's U.S. lawyer Michael Ratner was on Democracy Now! discussing Mr Assange's decision to seek political asylum in Ecuador. He discusses the real risks that Mr Assange faces if extradited to the U.S., and the refusal by the Australian Government to provide assurances that he wouldn't be extradited there.

labSurlab and other organizations published a press release urging Ecuador to support Mr Assange's request for asylum. The letter is available in its original Spanish, and an English translation is available as well.

[UPDATE: 14:50 BST] UK Pirate Party leader Loz Kaye appeared on RT discussing Julian Assange's application for asylum and the threat of U.S. extradition.

Glenn Greenwald wrote an op-ed for The Guardian about Mr Assange's right to seek asylum and why his concerns about U.S. extradition and prosecution are justified.

Supporters of Mr Assange and members of the media are currently in front of the Ecuadorian Embassy. (Images via George Sargent)
ImageImage

BBC published a "Q & A" about Mr Assange and diplomatic asylum. Anthony Aust, who served in the British Diplomatic Service for 35 years, said there was "no physical way to get Mr Assange from the embassy to Ecuador itself without the risk of him being arrested by UK police".

[UPDATE: 13:35 BST] The Embassy of Ecuador in London has posted official contact details relating to Julian Assange's asylum application:

"Please use 0207 590 2503 or ecuembpress@gmail.com"

NYT eXaminer reported on Mr Assange's request, commenting on The New York Times' use of "protective asylum" rather than "political asylum".

Graphic artist Somerset Bean has created a badge design in support of Mr Assange's decision to seek asylum.

[UPDATE: 13:07 BST] RT published an exclusive interview with Julian Assange's mother, Christine. She discusses his decision to seek asylum and his abandonment by the Australian government.

Another journalist has spoken with Gavin MacFadyen, reiterating previous comments that Mr Assange is doing well and in good spirits.

[UPDATE: 12:54 BST] A police spokeswoman stated that Julian Assange is subject to arrest under the Bail Act for breaching his curfew restriction. Police were seen entering and leaving the Embassy on the night of June 19. The Foreign Office said Mr Assange was "beyond the reach of the police" as he is in an embassy and on diplomatic territory.

Gavin McFayden visited Julian Assange and said he is in good spirits and staying in a room with a bed and TV, according to journalist Paraic O'Brien.

RT continues it's coverage of Mr Assange's request for asylum, interviewing political campaigner Peter Tatchell.

Julian Burnside was interviewed on ABC Radio about Mr Assange seeking asylum.

ABC's The Drum also discussed Mr Assange's decision for asylum, with panelists Joe Hildebrand from the Daily Telegraph, Jessica Irvine from the Sydney Morning Herald, ABC Radio National Sunday Extra presenter Jonathan Green, and Ecuador's Ambassador to Australia Raul Gangotena.

UK Friends of WikiLeaks have drafted a letter to the Ecuadorian Embassy regarding Julian Assange's decision to seek asylum and are asking that supporters mail it.

Nearly 17 hours after WikiLeaks made the announcement that Mr Assange was seeking asylum, and his name continues to trend on Twitter.
Image

[UPDATE: 08:45 BST] Vaughan Smith tweeted a correction to BBC's quotation of him: "My BBC quote on ‪#Assange‬ asylum is wrong. A well-funded campaign to undermine him for nearly 2 years, not just a few months."

[UPDATE: 07:55 BST] Australian journalist Phillip Dorling reported on what would happen in the event that Julian Assange's asylum is accepted, or if it is denied:

In the event Ecuador grants Mr Assange asylum, any movement outside the Ecuadorean Embassy would be subject to negotiation and agreement between the governments of the United Kingdom and Ecuador.

Should his application be rejected, he would be most likely be arrested once he left the embassy and his extradition to Sweden would proceed.

Australian Greens Senator Scott Ludlam approached the Senate regarding WikiLeaks, Julian Assange, and whether the Australian Government would prevent attempts by the U.S. to extradite and prosecute him. Chris Evans, acting representative for Prime Minister, first answered the question with jokes about Twitter, and then gave a vague answer.

[UPDATE: 05:00 BST] Australian Prime Minister Julia Gillard commented on Julian Assange's decision to request political asylum. She said he can make his own decisions and that the Australian Government will continue to provide him consular support. Though the lack of support from the Australian Government is one of the reasons Mr Assange has chosen to seek asylum in Ecuador.

Crikey's Guy Rundle has also covered the news, explaining why it is reasonable for Mr Assange to be seeking asylum.

[UPDATE: 04:40 BST] Julian Assange (sometimes #Assange) has been trending on Twitter since the announcement nine hours ago. Ecuador and #WikiLeaks have also trended.

Australian citizens will be protesting at the Sydney DFAT against their Government's poor treatment of Mr Assange on June 21, 5PM.

As a reminder of the threat Mr Assange faces from the U.S., there is a list of political figures who have called for his assassination.

[UPDATE: 03:42 BST] Jacob Appelbaum has posted his letter to the Government of Ecuador, urging them to grant Julian Assange asylum.

The Alyona Show covered Mr Assange's request for asylum during its "Main Stream Miss" section. Watch the video below.

[UPDATE: 03:40 BST] Filmmaker Michael Moore put out a statement regarding Julian Assange's request for political asylum. Here is his statement in full:

BREAKING: The Ecuadorian embassy in London has just given sanctuary to WikiLeaks' Jullian Assange. He is asking them for political assylum (which they had offered him in the past). Well, thank you Ecuador! IMHO, there is no doubt that if the UK sends him to Sweden, Sweden will send him to the USA. Sweden says they "just want to talk to him" about the accusations leveled at him (he has still not been charged with any crime). If Swedish police want to question him, there is an SAS flight that leaves Stockholm at 7:55 tomorrow morning (flight #525) to London. I'm sure the British authorities would have no problem with the Swedish police questioning Mr. Assange. Then Sweden can decide if it wants to charge him with a crime. Any and all allegations of sexual abuse by anyone and to anyone MUST be treated very seriously, and Mr. Assange should cooperate with the inquiry. But it appears that Sweden has little interest in these charges - what they really want is the ability to extradite Assange to America. And that, simply, must not happen.

Many supporters have been writing to the Embassy of Ecuador in London to voice their support for Mr Assange. You can do so via an online form at their official website. An email address is listed, but all emails seem to be bouncing.

[UPDATE: 01:55 BST] Australian Greens Senator Scott Ludlam was on ABC discussing Julian Assange's decision to seek asylum. He said Mr. Assange's concerns are well-founded after being labeled a terrorist by the U.S. Vice President and Stratfor emails revealing a sealed indictment against him. Watch the interview below.

Senator Ludlam also spoke in front of the Senate doors on the matter.

[UPDATE: 2012-06-20 00:30 BST] WikiLeaks has published an effective "declaration of abandonment" from the Australian Government, which refuses to protect Julian Assange or make any requests on his behalf.

2012-06-21 Live Blog: Assange requests political asylum from Ecuador (Archive - Day 3)

This is part of our live-coverage on Julian Assange's request for political asylum. The most recent news is available here. See the archives for coverage of previous days.

Follow @wl_central on Twitter for all the latest updates.

WikiLeaks announced via Twitter on the evening of June 19 (19:40 local time) that Julian Assange has requested political asylum at the Ecuadorian embassy in London.

This comes after the UK Supreme Court refused a submission to reopen his case on June 14. Julian Assange has spent 560 days under house arrest without charge. His extradition to Sweden is set between June 28 and July 7.

Mr Assange will remain at the embassy under the protection of the Ecuadorian government while they process his request.

In his statement to the Diplomatic Mission of Ecuador, Julian Assange commented on his abandonment by his home country, Australia, as well as the threat of the death penalty in the U.S.

Ecuador offered political asylum to Julian Assange in November 2010. At that time, Vice Chancellor Kintto Lucas stated, "We are open to grant him Ecuadorian residency, without any kind of problem or any kind of conditions." (President Rafeal Correa afterwards stated the offer was not official.)

Ecuadorian President Rafael Correa was a guest on Julian Assange's talk show "The World Tomorrow" this past May. The full interview is available online in English, Spanish, Italian, Russian, and Arabic.

Updates will be added as they become available.

............................................

[UPDATE: 22:17 BST] Audio from Julian Assange's interview today with ABC Radio Nation Breakfast is now available. We are currently working on a transcript.

[UPDATE: 22:03 BST] Julian Assange was on ABC Radio National Breakfast discussing his application for asylum in Ecuador. The audio is not online yet, but will be available at the Breakfast website. We will provide transcript shortly after.

Washington Post's poll currently shows that 84% of people believe that Julian Assange should be allowed to leave Britain for asylum in Ecuador.

[UPDATE: 20:18 BST] Supporters of Julian Assange have been holding a vigil outside the Ecuadorian Embassy in London since Mr Assange applied for bail. The vigil will continue tomorrow morning.

[UPDATE: 20:10 BST] At the Rio+20 conference, Ecuadorian president Rafael Correa made the following statement (originally in Spanish; translation via Professor's Blogg):

Ecuador is a territory of peace, justice, and truth – as described by Assange in his Asylum-petition letter.

We are very seriously analysing the reasons presented by Assange in his asylum request. We do not permit that the life of any human being shall be in danger. We believe that the first right of the humans is the right to life.

We refute political persecutions regardless of the ideology a person holds.

[UPDATE: 20:00 BST] Vaughan Smith was interviewed by Reuters about Julian Assange's request for asylum. Mr Smith is a friend of Mr Assange's who provided his house arrest location for a year and also helped provide his bail surety.

We seem to welcome it when a Chinese dissident goes to an American embassy, but when an Australian dissident in London goes to an Ecuadorean embassy we try to suggest it's nuts.

On Mr Assange's concerns about extradition to the U.S. and charges that could lead to life imprisonment or death, Mr Smith said the following:

I don't think we should be blind to that possibility. He clearly believes that. We can't comment whether that's realistic, but I think we can accept that it's reasonable for him to believe that.

Mr Smith continued:

He is no fool. He is a clever man, and he is very committed to his work at WikiLeaks which he is convinced serves a social purpose. I can assure you that he's committed to carrying on, and that's what I believe is his main motivator.

Why should we automatically assume that justice is freely available to Assange in Sweden?

Mr Smith also criticized Prime Minister Fredrik Reinfeldt for commenting publicly on the Assange case:

We would be disturbed by that in this country. We would feel it was not correct.

Considering the uniqueness of his situation, the Swedes could have attempted to reassure him and they haven't. They've done absolutely nothing to reassure him.

Jemima Khan, another supporter who helped provide bail, commented on Twitter:

For the record, in response to those asking about Assange & bail money....

I personally would like to see Assange confront the rape allegations in Sweden and the 2 women at the centre have a right to a response

BUT there is no doubt that Assange has a real fear of being extradited to the US nor that the US gov is out to get WikiLeaks.

[UPDATE: 19:00 BST] Sarah Saunders visited Mr Asange at the Ecuadorian Embassy. She said he is working hard on his asylum bid with the lawyers, and is comfortable and in good spirits. Ms Saunders is one of the supporters who helped put up surety, but she is not worried about her money at this stage.

[UPDATE: 18:17 BST] WikiLeaks spokesman Kristinn Hrafnsson visited Julian Assange at the Ecuadorian Embassy today. He said it could be hours or days before a decision in reached in Mr Assange's application for asylum. Ecuador has asked for information from Britain, Sweden and the United States to study before deciding whether or not to accept his request. Mr Assange is in good spirits and prepared to wait things out in the Embassy.

[UPDATE: 17:30 BST] Julian Assange's U.S. lawyer Michael Ratner was on RT disccusing the recent developments in his application for asylum. Mr Ratner said this was an important move, as he faces the worst prison in the U.S. with 40+ years in prison or the death penalty.

[UPDATE: 17:27 BST] Christine Assange spoke with her son over the phone recently.

The people who gave surety for his bail support his action. He's got his own money tied up in that as well and his understanding is that (seeking) asylum is an appeal process and his bail should be protected because of that.Julian told me that the asylum process is internationally recognised as a legitimate form of appeal and that the bail should not be forfeited.

The Crown Prosecution Service representing Sweden has been trying to stop ... Julian take his case to the Court of Human Rights. The Supreme Court gave him 14 days to get his appeal in but they (Sweden) are pushing for no days ... which would close that avenue of appeal. That's one of the reasons why he sought asylum.

If they are going to have to go through a detailed legal submission, it's not going to happen overnight. I don't know what his plan is. I guess that will be decided when his asylum is granted.

The fact is that many countries are signatories to this Universal Declaration for Human Rights but it seems that the US and UK and Australia and Sweden have abdicated their responsibility.

[Julian's] spirits are buoyed by the support and he's grateful and humble and thanks his supporters, including those in the media, and he's in fighting spirit. Hearing him sound OK and knowing that he is at least in good hands made a huge difference to me.

Democracy Now! reported on the most recent updated in Julian Assange's application for asylum. They briefly interviewed WikiLeaks spokesman Kristinn Hrafnsson.

Business Insider published "8 Reasons Why Ecuador Should Give Julian Assange Asylum".

Alexa O'Brien has been gathering evidence which shows the U.S. plan to prosecute Julian Assange, as well as six others. The FBI is targeting those seven civilians for "criminal activity and espionage".

RT correspondent Sarah Firth tweeted:

Interesting - Embassy’s cars are also inviolable so re safe passage #Assange could hop in a diplomatic car http://www.morton-fraser.com/news/2801_assange_in_the_embassy_history_repeating_itself

This means, if granted asylum, Mr Assange may have an easier time getting to Ecuador than previously thought.

[UPDATE: 16:27 BST] According to an overheard journalist, the decision for Julian Assange's asylum request is unlikely to come today, despite the 24 hour period previously set by Ecuador's Deputy Foreign Minister Marco Albuja. WikiLeaks spokesman Kristinn Hrafnsson said Mr Assange is working and comfortable.

Firedoglake's Kevin Gosztola wrote an article dissecting the sneering reaction by the media to Mr Assange's asylum request, including rehashing old smears that Mr Assange is anti-American and that he is doing this for attention.

[UPDATE: 16:10 BST] Washington Post is holding a poll asking its readers whether Julian Assange should be allowed to leave Britain for asylum in Ecuador. Currently 79% of voters have said he should.

Supporters of Julian Assange continuing rallying outside the Ecuadorian Embassy in London, despite the rain. (photo via @sombernessunlit)
Image

[UPDATE: 15:55 BST] Twitter users are organizing #Stand4JA, asking people to head to the Ecuadorian Embassy in London and be there to ensure Julian Assange can leave the Embassy safely. He will be arrested by the London Police when leaving for breaking his curfew, a part of his bail conditions. A Pirate Pad is also open for discussion and planning.

Australian Prime Minister Julia Gillard stated she will not meet with Ecuadorian President Rafeal Correa during the Rio+20 Summit.

Julian Assange's mother, Christine, attacked Australian Foreign Minister Bob Carr for failing to provide adiquate protections for her son.

This is a person who is uncharged, unquestioned, decorated all around the world for his journalism. It's really awful, here's my kid over there, alone in a foreign embassy with the cops out the side salivating. It's absolutely disgusting.

[UPDATE: 09:55 BST] Sarah Joseph, Director, Castan Centre for Human Rights Law at Monash University, wrote an article about what is likely to happen next for Julian Assange, depending on whether his request for asylum is approved by the Ecuadorian Government.

Twitter users have been sending their concerns and questions about Mr Assange to Australian Foreign Minister Bob Carr using the hashtag #askbob.

A rally in support of Julian Assange is currently taking place in Sydney. Speakers include Cameron Murphy, Richard Neville, Professor Jake Lynch, with statements being read from Phillip Adams, Austin Mackell, Mary Kostakidis, and local Ecuadorian activists.
(photos via @CassPF)
Image

IT Friends of Bradley Manning has posted some photos from the ongoing London vigil for Julian Assange being held in front of the Ecuadorian Embassy.

Adelaide Friends of WikiLeaks are holding a meeting to discuss Mr Assange's situation and plan future support action. The meeting will be held at Alfonso's, 202 Hutt Street, June 24 at 2PM.

[UPDATE: 07:50 BST] In his letter requesting asylum sent to Ecuador's president, Rafael Correa, Julian Assange stated "he wants to continue his mission in a country ... without limits, to reveal the truth, in a place of peace dedicated to truth and justice". President Correa said he was impressed with the letter.

The Australian Senate passed a motion by the Greens to withdraw prejudicial statements made against Julian Assange. Here is the full text of the motion:

To move - That the Senate-

Notes that:
1. Inconsistent or selective application of the Consular Services Charter leaves Australian citizens in doubt about the level of assistance they may receive if facing difficulties overseas.

Calls on the Prime Minister to:

1. Ensure that the government's efforts and engagement on behalf of Mr. Julian Assange are consistent with the highest level of support provided to other Australians in difficulty overseas.

2. Retract prejudicial statements regarding the illegality of Wikileaks publishing endeavours, found to be groundless by the Australian Federal Police, which have the potential to seriously jeopardise the potential for any fair trial or hearing for Mr. Assange.

The Australian Socialist Equality Party (SEP) condemned the Prime Minister Julia Gillard and her Labor Government for "its role in forcing WikiLeaks editor Julian Assange to seek asylum in Ecuador", i.e. failure to give him even the basic assurances that he would be protected from U.S. extradition and prosecution.

NYT eXaminer tracked the changes that NYT journalist Ravi Somaiya made to his article about Julian Assange's application for asylum. It shows how he started with an angle focused on Ecuador, changed to Mr Assange's violation of bail conditions, and then to a "stand off" between Britain and Ecuador. It also shows that an entire paragraph on the WikiLeaks Grand Jury was deleted.

Bernard Keane wrote an op-ed in Crikey which comments on how the U.S. "has already won" against WikiLeaks by strangling it with a financial blockade and causing Mr Assange to request asylum due to the real concern that the U.S. will extradite and prosecute him.

Today, Crikey's "First Dog on the Moon" comic was about Julian Assange's application for asylum in Ecuador.

[UPDATE: 03:50 BST] Sydney Morning Herald has published "A rough guide to refuge in Ecuador" which details what Julian Assange may expect if his request for political asylum is granted.

Australian Greens Senator Scott Ludlam wrote an article for The Drum entitled "No surprise Assange looking elsewhere for support". He describes the hostile environments in both Australia and the U.S. towards the WikiLeaks founder.

[UPDATE: 03:08 BST] A vigil for Julian Assange outside the Ecuadorian Embassy in London is continuing overnight, according to an email sent out by WISE UP for Bradley Manning. Those present at the vigil are asking that people come with tents and umbrellas.

Ecuadorian Embassy Location:
Flat 3B 3 Hans Crescent
London SW1X 0LS.
Tel: 020 7584 1367
Nearest Tube: Knightsbridge

[UPDATE: 02:45 BST] Human rights lawyer Jennifer Robinson visited Julian Assange at the Ecuadorian Embassy. In an interview with ABC AM, she commented that Mr Assange would not have the option to seek asylum after extradition to Sweden. She also stated that Mr Assange remains willing to be questioned by the Swedish prosecution while at the Embassy.

Australian Prime Minister Julia Gillard recently stated: "Our High Commisison in London is ... discussing the matter involving Mr ‪Assange‬ directly with their counterparts from Equador."

The Young Turks discussed Mr Assange's application for political asylum. Watch the segment below. (Please note that despite the use of the word "charges", Mr Assange has not been charged with any crime.)

[UPDATE: 02:02 BST] The Alyona Show discussed Julian Assange's request for political asylum in depth, featuring Jesselyn Radack from the Government Accountability Project and Kevin Zeese of the Bradley Manning Support Network.

[UPDATE: 01:48 BST] Many of Julian Assange's high-profile supporters who provided his bail have come out in favor of his decision to seek asylum.

Tariq Ali:

I totally approve. Why the double-standards? A Chinese dissident becomes a folk-hero for reaching the US embassy, but a Western dissident doing the same re a South American embassy is not kosher. Fuck the money.

Phillip Knightly:

I would [provide bail] again. He felt as I do that he’s a victim of a conspiracy. He’s been found guilty of nothing. The Swedes want to plug him in irons as soon as he arrived.

Bianca Jagger:

I wouldn’t presume to advise Julian Assange on a course of action. Only he and his legal team can make an informed judgement.

One thing I know is that the US Federal government can impose the death penalty. For many years I have campaigned on behalf of prisoners on death row in America. I know how many miscarriages of justice take place. This is one of the reasons I have been campaigning for the abolition of the death penalty in the USA and throughout the world.

If one looks at the trial of Bradley Manning, which has been an appalling mockery of the judicial process, one can understand Julian Assange’s concern. He fears that justice will not be served if he is extradited to the United States.

[UPDATE: 01:00 BST] Ecuadorian Foreign Minister Ricardo Patiño Aroca made a statement on Twitter regarding Julian Assange's request for asylum. Here is a translation via @Jaraparilla:

Thanks for the thousands of messages received regarding the request for political asylum made by Julian Assange to the govt of Ecuador yesterday. Assange's request requires in depth analysis. Ecuador declares that it will protect the human rights to life and freedom of expression. We are now studying the risk claimed by Assange of being judged for political reasons and that he could be condemned to death. Ecuador's constitution respects the right to life, does not recognize the death penalty and fully defends freedom of expression. The Ecuadorean government led by Rafael Correa has maintained a sovereign and principal foreign policy which will not change now.

[UPDATE: 00:50 BST] RT interviewed WikiLeaks spokesman Kristinn Hrafnsson outside the Ecuadorian Embassy. He says Mr Assange is in good spirits as always and is certain he has made the right move by requesting asylum. Watch the interview below.

An vigil for Julian Assange will take place at the Occupy Frankfurt Camp on 23 June, from 9PM.

[UPDATE: 2012-06-21 00:13 BST] Ecuador's Deputy Foreign Minister Marco Albuja stated that the decision on Julian Assange's asylum request is expected within 24 hours.

A thousand apologies, but we still can't make a final decision public yet until tomorrow. The national government is considering its position and the president will give us his instructions tomorrow. So the only information I can add is to refer you to statements already made.

Per E Samuelson, Julian Assange's Swedish lawyer, was on Sveriges Radio. He said Mr Assange is not afraid of the allegations in Sweden, but rather his potential extradition to the U.S. He also said things are a bit chaotic now, but Mr Assange has a temporary room in the Embassy and everything is under control.

RT America gave an update on Mr Assange's current status:

Christine Assange was interviewed on RT about her son's choice to seek asylum.

2012-06-22 Live Blog: Assange requests political asylum from Ecuador (Archive - Day 4)

This is part of our live-coverage on Julian Assange's request for political asylum. The most recent news is available here. See the archives for coverage of previous days.

Follow @wl_central on Twitter for all the latest updates.

WikiLeaks announced via Twitter on the evening of June 19 (19:40 local time) that Julian Assange has requested political asylum at the Ecuadorian embassy in London.

This comes after the UK Supreme Court refused a submission to reopen his case on June 14. Julian Assange has spent 560 days under house arrest without charge. His extradition to Sweden is set between June 28 and July 7.

Mr Assange will remain at the embassy under the protection of the Ecuadorian government while they process his request.

In his statement to the Diplomatic Mission of Ecuador, Julian Assange commented on his abandonment by his home country, Australia, as well as the threat of the death penalty in the U.S.

Ecuador offered political asylum to Julian Assange in November 2010. At that time, Vice Chancellor Kintto Lucas stated, "We are open to grant him Ecuadorian residency, without any kind of problem or any kind of conditions." (President Rafeal Correa afterwards stated the offer was not official.)

Ecuadorian President Rafael Correa was a guest on Julian Assange's talk show "The World Tomorrow" this past May. The full interview is available online in English, Spanish, Italian, Russian, and Arabic.

Updates will be added as they become available.

............................................

[UPDATE: 17:40 BST] There is still no indication of when Ecuador will make its decision on whether or not to grant Julian Assange political asylum. Democracy Now! and RT's The Big Picture reported on the latest:

@RTLondonBureau and @SaraFirth_RT have been tweeting from outside the Ecuadorian Embassy. WikiLeaks spokesman Kristinn Hrafnsson visited again today, John Pilger, journalist and friend of Mr Assange. Supporters continue holding a vigil outside the embassy.

Many articles have been coming out in support of Mr Assange's decision to seek asylum. James McEnteer, an author who lives in Quito, says "Come to Ecuador, Julian!" while journalist Ron Ridenour at Dissident Voice tells his readers to "Unite with Julian Assange". An article in OpEdNews explains "Why Americans Support Julian Assange and his Quest for Asylum in Ecuador".

While Mr Assange has been at the Embassy, the Progetto Winston Smith organisation awarded him "for his exceptional dedication to the promotion of transparency and public disclosure in the interest of civil society and human rights".

An article at the Washington Post from the editorial board, insinuating that Ecuador would face dire economic difficulties were it to accept Mr Assange into asylum:

There is one potential check on Mr. Correa's ambitions. The U.S. "empire" he professes to despise happens to grant Ecuador (which uses the dollar as its currency) special trade preferences that allow it to export many goods duty-free. A full third of Ecuadoran foreign sales ($10 billion in 2011) go to the United States, supporting some 400,000 jobs in a country of 14 million people. Those preferences come up for renewal by Congress early next year. If Mr. Correa seeks to appoint himself America's chief Latin American enemy and Julian Assange's protector between now and then, it's not hard to imagine the outcome.

Former CIA analyst Ray McGovern was interviewed about Mr Assange's decision to seek asylum, discussing the Washington Post's comment mentioned above.

Greens Senator Scott Ludlam asked the Australian Government to explain its statements denouncing WikiLeaks. Watch the video below.

[UPDATE: 06:45 BST] I4U News put out a collection of photos related to Julian Assange's application for asylum. The photos include pictures of WikiLeaks staff and supporters outside the Ecuadorian Embassy and a photo of activists in Ecuador demonstrating in Quito (pictured below).
Image

In the Washington Post poll about whether Julian Assange should receive asylum, the percentage of "yes" voters has constantly gone up. It currently stands that 87% of people believe Mr Assange should be allowed to leave Britain for asylum in Ecuador.

[UPDATE: 05:30 BST] RT America went over the many assassination threats from U.S. political figures directed toward Julian Assange:

An Ecuador TV Channel of the National Public Network is going to televise the episode of "The World Tomorrow" in which Julian Assange interviewed President Rafael Correa.

Professor of International Law Donald Rothwell was interviewed about Mr Assange's application for asylum, saying, if his application is granted, he may not have diplomatic status under the Vienna Convention that could get him to an airport in an Ecuadorian Embassy car.

[UPDATE: 04:50 BST] Ecuadorian President Rafael Correa was asked a question about Julian Assange's request for asylum during a conference in Rio. Below are tweets from Manuel Beltrán, who was translating the President's comments into English:

"Julian Assange, as crazy as to refuge in our embassy" "The censorship imposed to Assange" Correa about #Assange

"Ecuador loves the peace, the truth, we cannot accept this persecution for the ideas of #Assange" - #Correa

"There are conversations going on, we dont want confrontations with other countries like UK, we are analyzing the situation"#Assange

Journalist: "2 years ago the president said that maybe #Assange did something ilegal but the end was good" President Correa denies it.

The tone of president Correa sounds like the aceptance of the asylum it's just a matter of time. #Assange

"Assange will stay all the time he wants or needs under the protection of the Ecuatorian Embassy" Words of president Correa! #Wikileaks

The president doesn't say so much new about #Assange but gives a image of Ecuador as a freedom speech supporter country.

"Decision will take into account international laws and the traditional policy of Ecuador to safeguarding human rights" #Assange

Correa didn't replied a journalist about how the process of transferring #Assange from UK to Ecuador will happen.

We will post full text of President Correa's answer should it become available.

[UPDATE: 03:10 BST] Lawyer and human rights activist Kellie Tranter wrote an article detailing why Julian Assange's decision to seek asylum from Ecuador shouldn't be so surprising. She gives reasons why Ecuador is a good choice and the effects that WikiLeaks cables have had on the country. She also comments on the lack of support Australia has provided to Mr Assange.

A letter written by Australian journalist Austin Mackell was read at the recent rally for Julian Assange in Sydney. Here is an excerpt:

I would like to start once more by saying how honoured I am that the organisers sought to include my sentiments in today's events, and for the continuous support I have received from so many of those who also fight for Assange and Wikileaks.

For those of you unfamiliar with my case, I am an Australian journalist who was arrested in Mahalla, a textile town outside of Cairo, while trying to interview a union leader. My colleagues and I were held for a total of 56 hours by the police, the state security services and military intelligence, as well as a few hours in the care of the general prosecutor's office, where we were charged with inciting vandalism. Specifically it is alleged we promised to give money to children if they threw rocks at a police station. The charges carry a maximum penalty of seven years in prison. Four months has passed without a decision about whether to set a trial date or let us go. While embassy staff have done all they can without leadership from Canberra, the Australian government is yet to speak out or act on my behalf.

It is my belief that one reason for their reluctance, is that by acting on my behalf, they would be setting their failure to act on Assange in too sharp a contrast. It is a reminder, one that should be heeded by the Australian press in particular, that giving up on the freedom of one, not only morally, but also practically, compromises the freedom of all.

The full letter is available at Austin Mackell's website.

A public forum on "WikiLeaks, Assange, & Democracy" will be held at the Coombs Theatre, A.N.U., Canberra, June 27 at 7PM. Speakers include Christine Assange, Greens Senator Scott Ludlam, Crikey journalist Bernard Keane, historian Humphrey McQueen, former Guantanamo detainee David Hicks, and human rights & social justice advocate Aloysia Brooks. The event will be chaired by former SBS World News presenter Mary Kostakidis. A live-stream will be available via the Support Assange and WikiLeaks Coalition.

[UPDATE: 01:58 BST] A statement of support by Phillip Adams was read at the Sydney rally for Julian Assange:

Rupert Murdoch used to be Australia's most famous/notorious media identity on the international stage. A little while ago, he was pushed off the pedestal by Julian Assange, with News Ltd eclipsed by WikiLeaks. We're dealing with two very different success stories and degrees of notoriety. Many of us find the situation amusing, if it wasn't so damned serious. Rupert, of course, can look after himself, but Assange needs our ongoing help and concern. How sad that Julian had to seek asylum in the Ecuadorian Embassy. But then he'd find it hard to get any asylum in the Australian Embassy. Instead of an immense surge of Australian pride for Assange's contribution to what's left of democracy, we seem intent on aiding and abetting the U.S. in its attempts to ensnare him in their legal - and I use the term 'legal' very loosely - tentacles.

I first became aware of Julian's genius for creative subterfuge on Late Night Live many years ago when he was a most ingenious hacker. A little later he asked me to be the Australian representative on the advisory board of something called WikiLeaks and, impressed with the concept, I was delighted to agree. Over the years he's never asked mr to advise him on anything, but let me advise him now, or at least repeat what I've said to him and about him on a number of recent programs. You, Julian Assange, are a remarkable person and your creation - a sort of Freedom of Information service on a planetary scale - has been of crucial importance in the endless struggle to keep our political leaders, and their military cohorts, under control. My advice to you? Keep you chin up. For every powerful enemy you have countless thousands of friends, as today's rally demonstrates.

A petition (in Spanish) has been created at Avaaz calling for Ecuadorian President Rafael Correa to accept Julian Assange's request for political asylum.

A massive rally in support of Julian Assange will be on the steps of the State Library in Melbourne, July 1 starting at 1PM. Speakers include Adam Bandt MP (deputy leader of the Australian Greens), Patrick O'Connor (SEP candidate), Lizzie O'Shea (human rights lawyer), Robbie Thorpe (indigenous activist), Daniel Mathews (founding member of WikiLeaks). Rap News will also be making a special live appearance.

RT covered the latest news in Julian Assange's request for asylum, with RT Web Producer Andrew Blake. Watch the segment below.

RT America also reported on the latest events, with their London correspondent Sarah Firth:

[UPDATE: 00:50 BST] Gavin MacFadyen of the Bureau of Investigative Journalism gave an interview about Julian Assange's request for asylum in Ecuador. He mentions the good atmosphere he experienced at the Ecuadorian Embassy in London, including the helpful staff. He contests claims that supporters are moving away from Mr Assange after his decision to seek asylum. He also discussed the hostile environment towards WikiLeaks and Mr Assange currently present in the U.S. Read the full interview at Publica.

[UPDATE: 2012-06-22 00:04 BST] Transcript of Julian Assange's interview from the Ecuadorian Embassy is now available. In the interview Mr Assange discusses why he chose to seek asylum from Ecuador, his abandonment by the Australian Government, and evidence from the U.S. grand jury into WikiLeaks.

2012-06-23 Live Blog: Assange requests political asylum from Ecuador (Archive - Day 5)

This is part of our live-coverage on Julian Assange's request for political asylum. The most recent news is available here. See the archives for coverage of previous days.

Follow @wl_central on Twitter for all the latest updates.

WikiLeaks announced via Twitter on the evening of June 19 (19:40 local time) that Julian Assange has requested political asylum at the Ecuadorian embassy in London.

This comes after the UK Supreme Court refused a submission to reopen his case on June 14. Julian Assange has spent 560 days under house arrest without charge. His extradition to Sweden is set between June 28 and July 7.

Mr Assange will remain at the embassy under the protection of the Ecuadorian government while they process his request.

In his statement to the Diplomatic Mission of Ecuador, Julian Assange commented on his abandonment by his home country, Australia, as well as the threat of the death penalty in the U.S.

Ecuador offered political asylum to Julian Assange in November 2010. At that time, Vice Chancellor Kintto Lucas stated, "We are open to grant him Ecuadorian residency, without any kind of problem or any kind of conditions." (President Rafeal Correa afterwards stated the offer was not official.)

Ecuadorian President Rafael Correa was a guest on Julian Assange's talk show "The World Tomorrow" this past May. The full interview is available online in English, Spanish, Italian, Russian, and Arabic.

Updates will be added as they become available.

............................................

Bob Ellis, Australian writer, journalist, film-maker, and political commentator, wrote an article detailing how Julian Assange is in real danger of assassination. He explains that it is not farfetched to believe this, as four U.S. presidential candidates have called for his death, alleged leaker Bradley Manning has dealt with horrendous treatment, and "assassination is American foreign policy now".

Jacob Appelbaum tweeted the following:

It appears that just as Julian is requesting asylum that attempts at physical surveillance have returned to my life. Classy and predictable.

Al Jazeera covered a rally held in London today against extradition laws. The protest highlighted the cases of Talha Ahsan, Babar Ahmad, Richard O'Dwyer, Gary McKinnon, as well as Julian Assange. Watch the video below. (Note: It is stated in the video that Mr Assange faces charges - this is false. He has not been charged with any crime.)

Julian Assange also currently tops Al Jazeera English's website.

[UPDATE: 23:20 BST] Glenn Greenwald has written further on Julian Assange's bid for asylum, commenting on the attacks against him, specifically from The Washington Post.

In particular, this sneering, threatening, blindly jingoistic Washington Post Editorial is a classic illustration of this prevailing media attitude: the democratically elected Ecuadorian President, Rafael Correa, is “a small-time South American autocrat” because he defies the U.S.; Assange and Correa’s criticisms of American foreign policy are “anti-American slanders and paranoia”; granting Assange asylum would make Correa “a hero with the global anti-American left”; Congress should punish Ecuador if it grants asylum by withdrawing its “special trade preferences that allow it to export many goods duty-free”, etc. etc. As always in American media discourse: Our Side is the Embodiment of Freedom and Justice and anyone who criticizes Us are anti-freedom haters (as President Correa said in an interview yesterday: “if we had done a hundredth of what they did to Assange, we would be called dictators and oppressors”). The Post Editorial also contains this amazing passage:

The WikiLeaks man claims, after all, that he is resisting extradition to Sweden because he believes he will be subsequently turned over to the United States and exposed to the death penalty. That no U.S. charges or extradition case are open against him is irrelevant to this fantasy.

He then lists numerous articles from the Washington Post which have stated the possibility of Mr Assange being charged.

We have published an analysis of the smears and misconceptions about Mr Assange's application for asylum.

Democracy Now! tweeted that it's recent interview with Mr Assange's U.S. lawyer Michael Ratner about his bid for asylum is the "most viewed". If you missed the interview earlier, watch it below:

[UPDATE: 16:20 BST] Ecuadorian Ambassador to Britain Anna Alban is due to fly back to Quito to discuss the matter of Julian Assange's political asylum.

With further discussion scheduled, it is unlikely we will see a decision from Ecuador on Mr Assange's application for asylum for at least a few days.

RT reported on the latest updates in Mr Assange's decision to seek asylum:

Cryptome published a collection of photos from outside the Ecuadorian Embassy.

Image

[UPDATE: 10:15 BST] Filmmaker John Pilger gave a very brief comment outside the Ecuadorian Embassy in London after visiting Julian Assange:

He's in great spirits... unusually good spirits.

Green Left Weekly published an editorial: "Assange is right to seek asylum".

Graphic artist @SomersetBean has created series of posters in support of Julian Assange and his decision to seek asylum. One set, entitled "Not Running, Fighting", explains extradition facts of the U.S., Sweden, and Australia. He has also created a number of large placards with various slogans and the "Justice for Assange" website.

Vaughan Smith was on CNN discussing Mr Assange's decision to seek asylum, the criticism of Ecuador's free speech record, the campaign against Mr Assange, and his status as a Western dissident.

[UPDATE: 2012-06-23 02:32 BST] Ecuador recalled its ambassador to Britain to discuss what to do about WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange. President Rafael Correa stated, "We are calling our ambassador back for consultations because this is a very serious matter."

A high-level petition from Just Foreign Policy has been created.

Just Foreign Policy also published a letter from Michael Moore, Danny Glover, Oliver Stone, Glenn Greenwald, Naomi Wolf, and many, many more requesting Mr Assange be accepted into asylum.

Dear President Correa,

We are writing to urge you to grant political asylum to Julian Assange.

As you know, British courts recently struck down Mr. Assange's appeal against extradition to Sweden, where he is not wanted on criminal charges, but merely for questioning. Mr. Assange has repeatedly made clear he is willing to answer questions relating to accusations against him, but in the United Kingdom. But the Swedish government insists that he be brought to Sweden for questioning. This by itself, as Swedish legal expert and former Chief District Prosecutor for Stockholm Sven-Erik Alhem testified, is "unreasonable and unprofessional, as well as unfair and disproportionate."

We believe Mr. Assange has good reason to fear extradition to Sweden, as there is a strong likelihood that once in Sweden, he would be imprisoned, and then likely extradited to the United States.

Read the full letter and see the full list of signatories here.

Australian journalist Phillip Dorling wrote an article, "Are Assange's fears justified?"

The short answer is a great deal of evidence - from the public statements of the US government, Australian diplomatic reports released to Fairfax Media under freedom-of-information laws, and disclosures in the pre-court martial proceedings concerning US Army private Bradley Manning who faces 22 charges, including the most serious one of "aiding the enemy" by disclosing classified military information. There has never been that much secrecy about the US government's determination to pursue WikiLeaks.

Read the full article for an in-depth explanation of the evidence supporting Mr Assange's fears of U.S. extradition and prosecution.

Ecuadorian President Rafael Correa made the following statement in an interview published today:

In Ecuador, if someone had done one hundredth of what has been done to Assange, they would be called dictators and oppressors.

One of Julian Assange's Swedish lawyers, Thomas Olsson, says that the prosecution is attempting to use Mr Assange's bid for asylum to their advantage. He also says that, while Mr Assange would likely be cleared of all allegations in Sweden, his fear of U.S. extradition and prosecution is reasonable.

Julian Assange is "Truthdigger of the Week". The article states: "Few people have so fully devoted their lives to exposing abuses of power as WikiLeaks' founder Julian Assange". Regarding his asylum application, it says the following:

Even though Assange has broken no international law in seeking asylum from Ecuador, some, including New Statesman columnist David Allen Green, have portrayed him as a fugitive on the run. Assange has inspired the hatred of many since he first became internationally known in 2010. Much of that animosity has come from journalists and news organizations who have failed to do what Assange has done so spectacularly in the short time WikiLeaks has been operating: Make people and organizations who do bad things in secret think twice about doing them at all, because someone devoted to truth and transparency might expose them.

Green Left Weekly published "the real story" behind Ecuador's support for media freedom.

When Julian Assange sought asylum on June 19, the question many WikiLeaks supporters asked was: "Why the Ecuadorian embassy?"

The simple answer is because the Ecuadorian government has been one of the strongest supporters of WikiLeaks, which reflects its strong stance in defence of media and information freedom.

Australian Greens Senator Scott Ludlam says Australia has given up on Julian Assange. He discusses the lack of assistance they have provided, while evidence builds of U.S. plans to prosecute him.

2012-06-24 Live Blog: Assange requests political asylum from Ecuador (Archive - Day 6)

This is part of our live-coverage on Julian Assange's request for political asylum. The most recent news is available here. See the archives for coverage of previous days.

Follow @wl_central on Twitter for all the latest updates.

WikiLeaks announced via Twitter on the evening of June 19 (19:40 local time) that Julian Assange has requested political asylum at the Ecuadorian embassy in London.

This comes after the UK Supreme Court refused a submission to reopen his case on June 14. Julian Assange has spent 560 days under house arrest without charge. His extradition to Sweden is set between June 28 and July 7.

Mr Assange will remain at the embassy under the protection of the Ecuadorian government while they process his request.

In his statement to the Diplomatic Mission of Ecuador, Julian Assange commented on his abandonment by his home country, Australia, as well as the threat of the death penalty in the U.S.

Ecuador offered political asylum to Julian Assange in November 2010. At that time, Vice Chancellor Kintto Lucas stated, "We are open to grant him Ecuadorian residency, without any kind of problem or any kind of conditions." (President Rafeal Correa afterwards stated the offer was not official.)

Ecuadorian President Rafael Correa was a guest on Julian Assange's talk show "The World Tomorrow" this past May. The full interview is available online in English, Spanish, Italian, Russian, and Arabic.

Updates will be added as they become available.

............................................

[UPDATE: 18:05 BST] A vigil for Julian Assange, supporting his bid for asylum, will be held in Washington D.C. today (June 24), 6 PM at the Ecuadorian Embassy.

Embassy of Ecuador
1050 30th Street NW
Washington, D.C. 20009

Australian journalist Phillip Dorling writes that Mr Assange is seeking asylum in hopes of eliciting diplomatic guarantees that he will not be prosecuted in the U.S. on charges of espionage or conspiracy.

Julian Assange's interview from inside the Ecuadorian Embassy has been translated into German.

[UPDATE: 06:25 BST] Australian Attorney-General Nicola Roxon told Newtwork Ten the following:

There is nothing the Australian government can currently do [for Julian Assange] that it has not been doing.

In early May, Mr Assange's legal advisor Jennifer Robinson met with the Attorney-General asking for basic safeguards to prevent his extradition to the U.S. The entire list of requests was denied. The full list and the response letter are available via the WikiLeaks website.

[UPDATE: 06:15 BST] Bernard Keane has written an article in response to Australian Forign Minister Bob Carr's latest remarks on Julian Assange. Keane debunks Carr's assertations that it's easier to extradite from the UK than Sweden and that WikiLeaks' releases are not like the Pentagon Papers. Furthermore, he discusses the evidence of the U.S. grand jury into WikiLeaks:

As Assange laid out carefully in his interview with the ABC on Friday morning, there is copious evidence on the public record of a US investigation into Assange. The evidence has emerged during the trial of Bradley Manning, evidence has come from witnesses like David House who have been subpoenaed to testify before the grand jury pursuing Assange, evidence has come from the efforts of Twitter and Twitter account holders to fight subpoenas relating to the investigation.

The investigation is not specifically targeted at Bradley Manning, who is the defendant in a separate military trial process. It is not targeted at Swedish sexual assault allegations. It is targeted at WikiLeaks’s, and Assange’s, journalism.

The question for Bob Carr is not whether he has asked the Americans about a sealed indictment (which is not publicly confirmed, but the subject of extensive and corroborated reports, including from WikiLeaks’s opponents) but whether he has demanded to know why an Australian journalist (and found to be a journalist by sources as varied as the UK Supreme Court, the Walkley Foundation in Australian and the Martha Gellhorn trust in the UK) is the target of a US investigation simply for that journalism.

The full article is available at Crikey.

Francis FitzGibbon QC wrote an in-depth article on what Julian Assange must prove to be accepted into asylum. The three main points are:

  • (i) he has a fear of being persecuted
  • (ii) his fear is well-founded
  • (iii) he will be persecuted by reason of one or more of:
    • (a) his race (ie ethnicity);
    • (b) his religion;
    • (c) his nationality;
    • (d) his membership of a particular social group;
    • (e) his political opinion.

The Brisbane WikiLeaks Support Network reported on vigils for Julian Assange in both Brisbane and London. The report also includes a recent interview with activist Ciaron O'Reilly.

[UPDATE: 2012-06-24 02:05 BST] Australian Foreign Minister Bob Carr stated he has spoken to a single unnamed U.S. official regarding Julian Assange:

I've said to a senior US official... Have you got plans to extradite him? They haven't said they have plans.

2012-06-25 Live Blog: Assange requests political asylum from Ecuador (Archive - Day 7)

This is part of our live-coverage on Julian Assange's request for political asylum. The most recent news is available here. See the archives for coverage of previous days.

Follow @wl_central on Twitter for all the latest updates.

WikiLeaks announced via Twitter on the evening of June 19 (19:40 local time) that Julian Assange has requested political asylum at the Ecuadorian embassy in London.

This comes after the UK Supreme Court refused a submission to reopen his case on June 14. Julian Assange has spent 560 days under house arrest without charge. His extradition to Sweden is set between June 28 and July 7.

Mr Assange will remain at the embassy under the protection of the Ecuadorian government while they process his request.

In his statement to the Diplomatic Mission of Ecuador, Julian Assange commented on his abandonment by his home country, Australia, as well as the threat of the death penalty in the U.S.

Ecuador offered political asylum to Julian Assange in November 2010. At that time, Vice Chancellor Kintto Lucas stated, "We are open to grant him Ecuadorian residency, without any kind of problem or any kind of conditions." (President Rafeal Correa afterwards stated the offer was not official.)

Ecuadorian President Rafael Correa was a guest on Julian Assange's talk show "The World Tomorrow" this past May. The full interview is available online in English, Spanish, Italian, Russian, and Arabic.

Updates will be added as they become available.

............................................

[UPDATE: 14:05 BST] Christine Assange gave an interview with WSWS about her son's decision to seek asylum.

Some people have said he is trying to run away, but they [the authorities] have backed him into a corner where he has nowhere else to go.

Julian is the only person in these proceedings who has followed the law. Everybody else has been either breaching protocols or procedures. The Supreme Court was so focused on getting him over there [to Sweden] that it actually said he had been charged, when in fact, as everybody knows, there are only allegations. It also brought in new information into an appeal court, which is unheard of.

Dangerous precedents are being set all the time because of US pressure on other people’s governments, and that’s what happened with the Australian Extradition Act.

Julian’s asylum application is great. He has gone through all the court procedures but had his legal and human rights abused, and the Australian government has abandoned him. US politicians and commentators have called for him to be assassinated, and the government is trying to get him on any charge it can. According to the UN special rapporteur on torture, Bradley Manning has been tortured. The US is trying to get him to such a degraded state that he will falsely implicate Julian.

There are the emails from Stratfor, which reveal that there is an existing, sealed Grand Jury indictment on Julian, so he has every reason to fear for his life.

Read the full interview here.

Mr Assange's application has sparked discussion about how he could get from the Ecuadorian Embassy to the airport if he is granted asylum.

[UPDATE: 13:30 BST] A member of the Swedish Division for Criminal Cases and International Judicial Cooperation stated that Sweden is unable to offer guarantees that Julian Assange will not be extradited to the U.S.

Christine Assange gave an exclusive interview with Voice of Russia. She discusses the deliberate media smears against Julian, how he has offered to be questioned for two years about the Swedish allegations, his asylum application, and how he is doing at the Ecuadorian Embassy. Listen to the full interview here.

[UPDATE: 2012-06-25 01:12 BST] Oscar Swartz, author of "A Brief History of Swedish Sex", commented on Julian Assange's decision to seek asylum, saying he isn't worried about the allegations in Sweden, rather his potential onward extradition to the U.S. Watch his appearance on RT below:

A "Twibbon" has been created for people to add to their Twitter avatars in support of Julian Assange.

2012-06-26 Live Blog: Assange requests political asylum from Ecuador (Archive - Day 8)

This is part of our live-coverage on Julian Assange's request for political asylum. The most recent news is available here. See the archives for coverage of previous days.

Follow @wl_central on Twitter for all the latest updates.

WikiLeaks announced via Twitter on the evening of June 19 (19:40 local time) that Julian Assange has requested political asylum at the Ecuadorian embassy in London.

This comes after the UK Supreme Court refused a submission to reopen his case on June 14. Julian Assange has spent 560 days under house arrest without charge. His extradition to Sweden is set between June 28 and July 7.

Mr Assange will remain at the embassy under the protection of the Ecuadorian government while they process his request.

In his statement to the Diplomatic Mission of Ecuador, Julian Assange commented on his abandonment by his home country, Australia, as well as the threat of the death penalty in the U.S.

Ecuador offered political asylum to Julian Assange in November 2010. At that time, Vice Chancellor Kintto Lucas stated, "We are open to grant him Ecuadorian residency, without any kind of problem or any kind of conditions." (President Rafeal Correa afterwards stated the offer was not official.)

Ecuadorian President Rafael Correa was a guest on Julian Assange's talk show "The World Tomorrow" this past May. The full interview is available online in English, Spanish, Italian, Russian, and Arabic.

Updates will be added as they become available.

............................................

[UPDATE: 20:23 BST] Democracy Now! reported on the latest in Julian Assange's bid for asylum, with Ecuador's Ambassador to Britain, Anna Alban, returning to Ecuador to discuss his application. Ms Alban said the following:

We have offered him the ease to survive — food and access to some people that come to visit him. We are diligently providing him with the basics. This is what we have undertaken while this matter is worked out and a decision is made according to the Ecuadorian government’s position.

Watch the video clip below:

[UPDATE: 16:45 BST] Glenn Greenwald wrote a very detailed blog post in response to Twitter arguments against Julian Assange and his decision to seek asylum.

Barrister Greg Barns responded to an article on ABC Religion and Ethics which said Sweden should be respected for its handling of the Assange case.

Vaughan Smith published an email he sent in response to the manner his CNN interview about Julian Assange and his decision for asylum was conducted.

Latin American political analyst Thiago de Aragao and international law expert Professor Donald Rothwell were on Late Night Live Radio discussing Julian Assange's decision to see asylum and "Why Ecuador needs him".

Brisbane activist Ciaron O'Reilly was interviewed on ABC Radio about Julian Assange and his asylum application.

[UPDATE: 02:33 BST] A video has been uploaded of Robert Naiman hand delivering a letter to the Ecuadorian Embassy in London requesting Julian Assange be granted asylum. He hands over two petitions: one signed by prominent American supporters such as Michael Moore, Noam Chomsky, Danny Glover, Oliver Stone, Bill Maher, and Patch Adams, and a second signed by over 4,000 supporters. Read the letter here. The petition is still available to sign at the Just Foreign Policy website.

WL Central published an article entitled "Assange, Diplomacy, and Duplicity" which discusses the Washington Post's flip-flopping when discussing the U.S. threat against Julian Assange. Glenn Greenwald also commented on the same in the following tweet, mentioning The Guardian and the Wall Street Journal as well:

[UPDATE: 01:55 BST] Washington Post wrote on other prominent cases of people seeking asylum, listing Chen Guangcheng (2012), Manuel Noriega (1989), Fang Lizhi (1989), Edward Lee Howard (1986), Cubans in Havana (1980), Svetlana Stalin (1966), and Cardinal Jozsef Mindszenty (1956).

[UPDATE: 2012-06-26 01:35 BST] Ecuador lawyers are currently studying the political and legal ramifications of granting asylum to Julian Assange. An estimated date of the decision is yet to be made available.

Otto Reich, who served as a senior official in the Bush Jr., Bush Sr., and Reagan administrations, wrote an Op-Ed stating that the U.S. should not sign any new trade agreements with Ecuador were they to accept Julian Assange into political asylum. In the article he labels Mr Assange as an "accused sex-criminal" and vehemently attacks Ecuadorian President Rafael Correa.

Robert Naiman, policy director at Just Foreign Policy, says that many Americans support Julian Assange, referencing a letter signed by supporters requesting that Ecuador take him into asylum. Listen to his interview in the video below:

Daily Beast/Newsweek named Julian Assange as #1 in its Power Index on Revolutionaries. The blurb about him reads:

The Australian who turned a precocious hacking habit into an activist crusade for freedom of information founded WikiLeaks in 2006. Julian Assange and his site rose to prominence with the release of classified documents revealing government corruption, civilian casualties in the Iraq and Afghan wars, and the full text of Sarah Palin’s emails. The organization’s most recent coup: publishing internal emails from global intelligence firm Stratfor. For his part, Assange remains holed up in Ecuador to avoid extradition to Sweden, where he’s accused of sexual misconduct. He launched a talk show in April.

An article in OpEdNews by former FBI Special Agent Coleen Rowley reminds readers that Julian Assange was awarded the Sam Adams Award for Integrity in 2010. Sam Adams associates delivered a letter to the Ecuadorian Embassy in Washington requesting that Julian Assange be granted asylum.

2012-06-27 Live Blog: Assange requests political asylum from Ecuador (Archive - Day 9)

This is part of our live-coverage on Julian Assange's request for political asylum. The most recent news is available here. See the archives for coverage of previous days.

Follow @wl_central on Twitter for all the latest updates.

WikiLeaks announced via Twitter on the evening of June 19 (19:40 local time) that Julian Assange has requested political asylum at the Ecuadorian embassy in London.

This comes after the UK Supreme Court refused a submission to reopen his case on June 14. Julian Assange has spent 560 days under house arrest without charge. His extradition to Sweden is set between June 28 and July 7.

Mr Assange will remain at the embassy under the protection of the Ecuadorian government while they process his request.

In his statement to the Diplomatic Mission of Ecuador, Julian Assange commented on his abandonment by his home country, Australia, as well as the threat of the death penalty in the U.S.

Ecuador offered political asylum to Julian Assange in November 2010. At that time, Vice Chancellor Kintto Lucas stated, "We are open to grant him Ecuadorian residency, without any kind of problem or any kind of conditions." (President Rafeal Correa afterwards stated the offer was not official.)

Ecuadorian President Rafael Correa was a guest on Julian Assange's talk show "The World Tomorrow" this past May. The full interview is available online in English, Spanish, Italian, Russian, and Arabic.

Updates will be added as they become available.

............................................

[UPDATE: 17:42 BST] The Ecuadorian Embassy in London has been flooded with messages of support for Julian Assange. Ecuador's Minister of Foreign Affairs stated:

More than 10,000 emails have been received at the moment.

Thousands of people asking the Ecuadorian government to accord asylum to Julian Assange, founder of WikiLeaks, sent a steady stream of messages saying why they support him.

This comes a just after a petition with signatures from many high-profile people, along with over 4,000 other supporters, was hand delivered to the Embassy.

An article in WSWS details the latest evidence of a U.S. operation against Julian Assange, including information that has come out of Bradley Manning's pre-trial hearings.

[UPDATE: 2012-06-27 03:30 BST] U.S. history professor Lawrence Davidson wrote an essay entitled "Hero on the run: Julian Assange and his US detractors" in which he explains why Julian Assange should be treated as a hero, not hunted as a criminal.

Julian Assange is now a hero on the run. And, he is probably going to stay that way for the foreseeable future. Even if he makes it to Ecuador he will need bodyguards to protect him from kidnapping or worse. As one Pentagon spokesman put it, “If doing the right thing is not good enough for [Assange] then we will figure out what other alternatives we have to compel [him] to do the right thing.” And what do America’s leaders regard as the “right thing” in this case? Obviously, keeping silent about Washington’s doing the wrong thing.

Read the full essay here.

Jacob Appelbaum was interviewed by Voice of Russia about Julian Assange's decision to seek asylum. He explains how he believes Mr Assange chose to seek asylum after losing faith in the justice system. He also discusses how people internationally can support him:

I think a couple of things. One thing is to understand that it is not that Julian has no interest in resolving these issues in Sweden. I talked to him quite extensively about it. The problem is that Sweden will not make even the most basic guaranties. For example they could interview him right now in the embassy and clear things up, they refused to do that. So, pressuring the Swedish Government to remotely interview him, as they have done in many other cases, that is an extremely useful thing to do.

Furthermore, pressuring the Australian Government to actually protect their own citizens, I mean how sad it is that an Australian citizen had to go to another country to ask for help. And finally writing a letter of support to the Ecuadorian Government suggesting that you would go there as a tourist, that you would be ever so grateful, that giving Assange this asylum would really be a positive thing in the world – that is the thing which everyone can do, it is as simple as going to the embassy’s website and filling in the form. I wrote one of these letters myself.

Read or listen to the full interview here.

A public forum on "WikiLeaks, Assange, and Democracy" is being held at the Coombs Theatre, A.N.U, Canberra tonight (June 27) at 7PM. Speakers include:

  • Christine Assange - Mother of Julian Assange
  • Senator Scott Ludlam - Greens WA
  • Bernard Keane - Crikey journalist
  • Humphrey McQueen - Historian
  • David Hicks - Ex-Guantanamo Bay detainee
  • Aloysia Brooks - Human rights & social justice advocate
  • Chaired by Mary Kostakidis - Former SBS World News Presenter

The entire event will be also be live-streamed.

2012-06-28 Live Blog: Assange requests political asylum from Ecuador (Archive - Day 10)

This is part of our live-coverage on Julian Assange's request for political asylum. The most recent news is available here. See the archives for coverage of previous days.

Follow @wl_central on Twitter for all the latest updates.

WikiLeaks announced via Twitter on the evening of June 19 (19:40 local time) that Julian Assange has requested political asylum at the Ecuadorian embassy in London.

This comes after the UK Supreme Court refused a submission to reopen his case on June 14. Julian Assange has spent 560 days under house arrest without charge. His extradition to Sweden is set between June 28 and July 7.

Mr Assange will remain at the embassy under the protection of the Ecuadorian government while they process his request.

In his statement to the Diplomatic Mission of Ecuador, Julian Assange commented on his abandonment by his home country, Australia, as well as the threat of the death penalty in the U.S.

Ecuador offered political asylum to Julian Assange in November 2010. At that time, Vice Chancellor Kintto Lucas stated, "We are open to grant him Ecuadorian residency, without any kind of problem or any kind of conditions." (President Rafeal Correa afterwards stated the offer was not official.)

Ecuadorian President Rafael Correa was a guest on Julian Assange's talk show "The World Tomorrow" this past May. The full interview is available online in English, Spanish, Italian, Russian, and Arabic.

Updates will be added as they become available.

............................................

[UPDATE: 20:40 BST] BBC has posted an audio excerpt from Julian Assange's upcoming interview. Below is the transcript:

Interviewer: Mr Assange, you have been summoned to appear at Belgravia Police Station tomorrow morning. Are you going to go?

Julian Assange: Our advice is that asylum law, both internationally and domestically within the UK, takes precedence to extradition law. So the answer is almost certainly not.

Interviewer: Almost certainly? You're still hesitating?

Julian Assange: Well, the issues are being looked at; we only received the letter this morning.

Interviewer: What are you afraid of if you do go to Sweden?

Julian Assange: Well, the concern is predominately in relation to the United States and it's not a concern that affects me alone. It concerns a number of people who have worked for our organisation and been volunteers for it. In the United States, since at least the beginning of 2011, according to The Washington Post, a U.S. Grand Jury has been empaneled in Washington, and it has been pulling in witnesses, forced testimony from those witnesses, and subpoenaed records from Google, from Twitter, from our ISP, that has been working with the FBI. Now, according to public record, the file for the prosecution has reached 42,135 pages as a result of Bradley Manning's hearings. Bradley Manning, an alleged associate of mine, who is in prison, they say, for interacting with me, has been found to have been placed under torturous conditions, by the UN Special Rapporteur. His lawyer says that the reason he has been placed in those conditions - the reason he has been subject to cruel, inhumane, and degrading treatment - is so that they can force him to testify against me.

Interviewer: What evidence do you have for that?

Julian Assange: That is a matter of public record. It is public record from the hearings that have occurred in the past few months in the United States in Washington.

For UK residents, the full interview can be heard tonight on BBC2, 22:30 BST.

[UPDATE: 18:50 BST] A new BBC Newsnight interview with Julian Assange will air tonight at 22:30 BST on BBC2.

In response to the police requesting he come to the station tomorrow, Mr Assange said:

Our advice is that asylum law both internationally and domestically takes precedence over extradition law so almost certainly not.

[UPDATE: 18:10 BST] Journalists, intellectuals, artists and academics from Mexico have signed a letter in support of Julian Assange and his decision to seek asylum. The letter demands that Mr Assange stop being portrayed as a dangerous enemy and also calls for the U.S. Government to drop the charges against Bradley Manning. Signatories include Carlos Payan Velver, founding director of La Jornada, writer Elena Poniatowska, poet Hugo Gutiérrez Vega, historian Lorenzo Meyer, and artists Gabriel Orozco and Vicente Rojo.

The UK High Court has halted the extradition of a previously convicted child sex offender on allegations of raping and sexually assaulting three underage girls. Meanwhile, Julian Assange, who is yet to be charged with any crime and could be questioned via telephone or other lawful and normal procedures, is facing arrest and extradition to Sweden were he to leave the Ecuadorian Embassy.

[UPDATE: 13:55 BST] WikiLeaks tweeted the following in response to this morning's reports of UK police delivering a letter requesting Julian Assange present himself at the police station:

[UPDATE: 13:30 BST] RT London correspondent Sarah Firth tweeted the following statement from the Metropolitan Police:

The MPS have this morning, Thursday 28 June, served a surrender notice upon a 40-year-old man that requires him to attend a police station at date and time of our choosing. This is standard practice in extradition cases and is the first step in the removal process. He remains in breach of his bail conditions, failing to surrender would be a further breach of conditions and he is liable to arrest.

Ms Firth is seeking further clarification on the statement.

Firedoglake's Kevin Gosztola wrote an analysis of the reactions to Julian Assange's decision to seek asylum. He comments on the thousands of emails the Ecuadorian Embassy received in support of Mr Assange, along with a letter with high-profile signatories which was hand-delivered to the Embassy. In contrast, we see media commentators and pundits in the UK and U.S. who attack Mr Assange for his decision.

[UPDATE: 12:50 BST] Newspapers are reporting that the Metropolitan Police have delivered a letter to Julian Assange stating that he must present himself at the police station at 11:30 tomorrow morning. It is likely that this is a standard procedure, as tomorrow is the first day of the 10-day window in which he was supposed to be extradited to Sweden. As long as he remains in the Ecuadorian Embassy, he should be under protection from arrest.

El Telegrapho reported on the latest statements from Ecuadorian President Rafael Correa, during a conference in Guayaquil. He commented that the decision is "not simple" and time must be taken to do proper analysis of Julian Assange's request.

[UPDATE: 2012-06-28 01:05 BST] A rally for Julian Assange will be held at the Swedish Embassy in London, June 28 at 3PM. (The website states on hold, but an email has been sent out stating that the rally will be held, as media and important organisations are scheduled to be there.)

Media Lens published an in-depth analysis of the media coverage of Julian Assange's decision to seek asylum.

The media response to Assange’s asylum request tells us much about the default brutality and reflexive herdthink of elite corporate journalism. We witnessed a rush to be seen to revile Assange as a ‘turd’, ‘weirdo’, ‘narcissist’ and joke. The crucial importance of his achievements, of his cause, was deemed utterly irrelevant beside his allegedly unbearable personal failings.

Almost as disturbing as the tsunami of mindless vitriol is the lack of dissent. US analyst Glenn Greenwald has so far been the sole high-profile political commentator willing to take on the UK’s hard-right ‘liberals’. By contrast, the Guardian and Independent’s dissident figleaves, and the many aspirational leftists who long to join them, have kept their heads down, saying nothing in support of a man who has risked his freedom and life to expose vast crimes of state.

It is yet more evidence, if any were needed, that political ‘convergence’ – the empty ‘choice’ between Old Tories and New Tories – has brought with it a dramatic and dangerous narrowing of 'mainstream' thought and dissent. We seem to be at the dawn of a brave new world: a high-tech Dark Age dominated by a kind of corporate feudalism.

Read their full anaylsis here.

Video of yesterday's forum on "WikiLeaks, Assange, and Democracy" is available online. The speakers were Christine Assange, Senator Scott Ludlam, Bernard Keane, Humphrey McQueen, David Hicks, Aloysia Brooks, and Mary Kostakidis.

WL Central has transcribed a conversation on Late Night Live Radio about Julian Assange's decision to seek asylum between Phillip Adams, with South American journalist Thiago de Aragao and international law professor Donald Rothwell.

2012-06-29 Live Blog: Assange requests political asylum from Ecuador (Archive - Day 11)

This is part of our live-coverage on Julian Assange's request for political asylum. The most recent news is available here. See the archives for coverage of previous days.

Follow @wl_central on Twitter for all the latest updates.

WikiLeaks announced via Twitter on the evening of June 19 (19:40 local time) that Julian Assange has requested political asylum at the Ecuadorian embassy in London.

This comes after the UK Supreme Court refused a submission to reopen his case on June 14. Julian Assange has spent 560 days under house arrest without charge. His extradition to Sweden is set between June 28 and July 7.

Mr Assange will remain at the embassy under the protection of the Ecuadorian government while they process his request.

In his statement to the Diplomatic Mission of Ecuador, Julian Assange commented on his abandonment by his home country, Australia, as well as the threat of the death penalty in the U.S.

Ecuador offered political asylum to Julian Assange in November 2010. At that time, Vice Chancellor Kintto Lucas stated, "We are open to grant him Ecuadorian residency, without any kind of problem or any kind of conditions." (President Rafeal Correa afterwards stated the offer was not official.)

Ecuadorian President Rafael Correa was a guest on Julian Assange's talk show "The World Tomorrow" this past May. The full interview is available online in English, Spanish, Italian, Russian, and Arabic.

Updates will be added as they become available.

............................................

[UPDATE: 22:58 BST] RT America reported on the latest in Julian Assange's bid for asylum. Whistleblower Thomas Drake is interviewed about the matter. Watch the video below:

[UPDATE: 22:50 BST] B. J. Sachs, an Ecuador resident of 17 years, wrote on why people should support Julian Assange.

Yes, Julian Assange’s actions could have been easily predicted to arouse the extreme wrath of war makers the world over and their media mouthpieces. Duh, as they say. But the thing is this: Assange’s journalistic mission to expose secrets lies and war crimes won out over any fears he might have had for his personal safety. That is precisely what makes his actions heroic in my book, as well as those of the whistle blowers whose consciences propelled them to blow the whistle, that is to give us, the people, important information and therefore the tools to act. They are all heroic and worthy of our strong support in my book, and they are definitely less-than-loved-and-appreciated by the warmongers and war profiteers in government and industry. Thus there may already be a sealed indictment against Julian Assange, and very possibly for the capital crime of espionage punishable by death. It is certain that a grand jury has been impaneled and many subpoenas have been issued. Grand Jury proceedings are always secret, as are indictments until the prosecutor wishes to reveal or unseal them. If Assange is charged and tried for his heroism, we are all screwed. Totally.

Read the full article via CounterPunch.

[UPDATE: 20:32 BST] The US is looking to extradite a man in Sweden, who went AWOL from the Air Force nearly 30 years ago. He is not alleged to have committed any other crime besides going AWOL from the military in 1984.

[UPDATE: 19:20 BST] Here is the full video of Susan Benn's statement regarding Julian Assange's asylum bid made today. The transcript is in the update below.

[UPDATE: 16:58 BST] Here is the full statement made by Susan Benn today at 16:00 in front of the Ecuadorian Embassy in London:

Thank you for coming – My name is Susan Benn from the Julian Assange Defense Fund.

I have spoken to Julian today and he is in good spirits. He is grateful for the support shown to him by the people of Ecuador and so many others from around the world.

Yesterday Mr. Assange was served with a letter from the Metropolitan police service requesting that he surrender himself to the Belgravia police station at 11.30 this morning.

Mr Assange has been advised that he should decline to comply with the police request. This should not be considered any sign of disrespect. Under both international and domestic UK law asylum assessments take priority over extradition claims.

The issues faced by Mr. Assange are serious. His life and liberty and the life and liberty of his organization and those associated with it are at stake.

The United States Government has instigated a grand jury investigation against Julian Assange and other “founders or managers” of Wikileaks. Australian diplomats have described this investigation as being of “unprecedented scale and nature”. There is irrefutable evidence in the public record of subpoenas being issued and witnesses being compelled to testify against Mr. Assange. WikiLeaks, the ACLU, the Center for Constitutional Rights and other groups have been fighting these subpeonas and other issues arising from the investigation in multiple US courts. US officials have said in open court that the FBI file about the investigation has now reached 42,135 pages. The US department of justice admitted yesterday that its investigation into WikiLeaks proceeds. It is only a matter of time before US authorities begin extradition proceedings against Julian and other leading members of WikiLeaks on various charges including conspiracy to commit espionage. There are credible reports that a sealed indictment has already been made against Mr. Assange. Under US law a sealed indictment can only be made public once Mr. Assange is in custody. For a US official to otherwise acknowledge the existence of a sealed indictment is a criminal offense. The Independent newspaper’s diplomatic correspondent reported that informal talks between the US and Sweden have been conducted.

It should be made clear what would happen if Julian was extradited to the USA. The United Nations special rapporteur for torture, Juan Mendez has formally found that the United States has subjected Julian Assange’s alleged source in this matter, the young soldier Bradley Manning, to conditions amounting to torture. The UN found that the United States subjected Bradley Manning to “cruel, inhuman and degrading treatment”. Mr. Manning has been charged by the US government with the capital offense of “aiding the enemy” in relation to his alleged interaction with Mr. Assange. Bradley Manning has been detained without trial for two years and was placed into solitary confinement for 9 months in his cell for 23 hours a day, stripped naked and woken every 5 minutes. His lawyer and support team say these harsh measures were to coerce him into implicating Julian Assange.

So it is clear that there is a legal process in place which will result in taking Julian to the US, which if allowed to succeed would violate his basic rights.

It is accepted by the UK Supreme Court that Julian Assange has not been charged with any criminal offence in Sweden. It is also accepted that he was by told by Swedish authorities that he was free to leave Sweden. And it is also accepted that he has continuously offered to be interviewed by the Swedish authorities here in the UK, should they wish to do so. Although it is normal procedure, Swedish authorities have refused, without reason, to make the 3 hour trip to London and to interview Julian causing him to be trapped in the UK under virtual house arrest for 561 days and an additional 10 days in solitary confinement – all without charge. Instead they have issued an INTERPOL Red notice and extradition requests.

Julian and his legal team have previously sought assurances from both the UK government and the Swedish government that they will guarantee safe passage after the completion of legal interviews with Mr Assange and both have previously refused, although we are hopeful they will look at the matter again. The Swedish executive publicly announced on June 14 that it would detain Mr. Assange in prison without charge.

Once in Sweden under such grave restrictions it would be impossible for Mr. Assange to exercise his asylum rights.

Mr. Assange did not feel safe from US extradition in the UK. We are all too aware of the abuses of the US-UK extradition treaty. Although Mr. Assange has been trapped in the UK, under dangerous circumstances, he at least has had the freedom to apply for political asylum.

It is in this context that Julian has made the difficult decision to seek refuge inside the Ecuadorian Embassy to ask for asylum.

Julian will remain in the Embassy under the protection of the Ecuadorian government while evidence for his application is being assembled and processed.

For further accurate information about these issues, please see www.justice4assange.com

Thank you.

[UPDATE: 16:25 BST] Susan Benn of the Julian Assange Defence Fund make a statement regarding Mr Assange's current position. He is in good spirits and grateful for all the support. He has been advised not to go to the Metropolitan Police Station. The life and liberty of him and those associated with WikiLeaks are at stake, and it is only a matter of time before U.S. authorities begin extradition procedures. Mr Assange‬ will remain in the Embassy under the protection of the Ecuadorian Government while evidence for his application is processed.

We will have the full statement up when it is available.

[UPDATE: 15:43 BST] Christine Assange gave an exclusive interview with Urban Times regarding her son's bid for asylum. She discusses why he chose Ecuador, how he is doing, the Swedish allegations, the lack of support from the Australian Government, and more.

[UPDATE: 15:15 BST] WikiLeaks tweeted the following:

A lot of speculation is floating around about whether Mr Assange will give the statement himself, but at the moment the tweet is the only solid information available.

[UPDATE: 2012-06-29 02:33 BST] The Ecuadorian Embassy in London has issued a new statement regarding Julian Assange's asylum application:

We can confirm that this morning officers from the Metropolitan Police Service in London delivered a letter to Mr Assange via the Ecuadorian Embassy.

Separately, the South America Department of the Foreign and Commonwealth Office has written to the Ecuadorian Embassy today, reaffirming their commitment to “promoting excellent bilateral relations between the Republic of Ecuador and the United Kingdom Government”

The Government of Ecuador will continue to foster good relations with the UK Government whilst assessing Mr Assanges application for asylum.

RT reported on the latest developments in Mr Assange's bid for asylum. They interviewed Sibel Edmonds, founder of the National Security Whistleblowers Coalition. Watch the video below or read a summary here:

WikiLeaks tweeted the following:

Swedish police and prosecutors questioned a man in Serbia over an alleged murder, yet they still refuse all offers to question Julian Assange. He still remains willing to answer questions, even from within the Ecuadorian Embassy.

SomersetBean has created more posters in support of Julian Assange and his choice to seek asylum. He has made them about our article: "Dissecting the Smears: Assange's asylum bid", the sealed indictment against Assange, and a rally in Sydney on July 15. All posters are available at his blog.

2012-06-30 Live Blog: Assange requests political asylum from Ecuador (Archive - Day 12)

This is part of our live-coverage on Julian Assange's request for political asylum. The most recent news is available here. See the archives for coverage of previous days.

Follow @wl_central on Twitter for all the latest updates.

WikiLeaks announced via Twitter on the evening of June 19 (19:40 local time) that Julian Assange has requested political asylum at the Ecuadorian embassy in London.

This comes after the UK Supreme Court refused a submission to reopen his case on June 14. Julian Assange has spent 560 days under house arrest without charge. His extradition to Sweden is set between June 28 and July 7.

Mr Assange will remain at the embassy under the protection of the Ecuadorian government while they process his request.

In his statement to the Diplomatic Mission of Ecuador, Julian Assange commented on his abandonment by his home country, Australia, as well as the threat of the death penalty in the U.S.

Ecuador offered political asylum to Julian Assange in November 2010. At that time, Vice Chancellor Kintto Lucas stated, "We are open to grant him Ecuadorian residency, without any kind of problem or any kind of conditions." (President Rafeal Correa afterwards stated the offer was not official.)

Ecuadorian President Rafael Correa was a guest on Julian Assange's talk show "The World Tomorrow" this past May. The full interview is available online in English, Spanish, Italian, Russian, and Arabic.

Updates will be added as they become available.

............................................

[UPDATE: 22:33 BST] AFP published the latest statements from Ecuadorian President Rafael Correa regarding Julian Assange's asylum bid:

We are analyzing the case with full responsibility and, as we have said a thousand times, we have no deadline to make a decision.

That decision will be absolutely sovereign and ... (show) respect for human rights.

[UPDATE: 21:45 BST] U.S. Justice Department spokesman Dean Boyd stated today:

There continues to be an investigation into the WikiLeaks matter.

[UPDATE: 17:10 BST] Julian Assange's U.S. lawyer Michael Ratner was interviewed by AFP about Mr Assange's decision to seek asylum:

He had two very difficult choices. I think he would go to Sweden immediately if he got assurances from the United States that there was not going to be a prosecution.

He made a very difficult choice for himself.

Regarding U.S. officials being silent regarding Mr Assange, he said:

I think they're quiet now because there's a grand jury or an indictment and they don't want to prejudice any ultimate trial. That would be my best guess.

Mr Ratner also said the following about whether he thinks Ecuador will accept Mr Assange's application:

I'm very hopeful about it, I'll put it that way. They have the ability and the president and the country have the guts to stand up to the United States.

Of all the countries that would be one of the most favorable (to Assange's request), it would be Ecuador.

[UPDATE: 16:37 BST] Former CIA analyst Ray McGovern was on RT discussing what Julian Assange could face, were he extradited to the U.S. Watch the interview below:

[UPDATE: 2012-06-30 02:37 BST] BBC Newsnight's interview with Julian Assange yesterday is now available on YouTube. Listen below:

2012-07-10 Live Blog: Assange requests political asylum from Ecuador

This is our live-coverage on Julian Assange's request for political asylum. See the archives for coverage of previous days.

Follow @wl_central on Twitter for all the latest updates.

WikiLeaks announced via Twitter on the evening of June 19 (19:40 local time) that Julian Assange has requested political asylum at the Ecuadorian embassy in London.

This comes after the UK Supreme Court refused a submission to reopen his case on June 14. Julian Assange has spent 560 days under house arrest without charge. His extradition to Sweden is set between June 28 and July 7.

Mr Assange will remain at the embassy under the protection of the Ecuadorian government while they process his request.

In his statement to the Diplomatic Mission of Ecuador, Julian Assange commented on his abandonment by his home country, Australia, as well as the threat of the death penalty in the U.S.

Ecuador offered political asylum to Julian Assange in November 2010. At that time, Vice Chancellor Kintto Lucas stated, "We are open to grant him Ecuadorian residency, without any kind of problem or any kind of conditions." (President Rafeal Correa afterwards stated the offer was not official.)

Ecuadorian President Rafael Correa was a guest on Julian Assange's talk show "The World Tomorrow" this past May. The full interview is available online in English, Spanish, Italian, Russian, and Arabic.

Updates will be added as they become available.

............................................

[UPDATE: 17:53 BST] Ecuadorian President Rafael Correa stated that his government's decision on whether to grant Julian Assange asylum will not be affected by pressure from the U.S., Britain, or Sweden.

We will consult with everyone we need to, but we will make a sovereign decision on whether or not to grant asylum to the Australian, Julian Assange.

If Assange's life is at risk, that is sufficient cause to approve his asylum. [...] the death penalty exists in the United States for political crimes.

Furthermore, he said the Ecuadorian government would "examine what the allegations are in Sweden, how the judicial process is carried out, and if it is compatible with the humanist vision of justice that we have in Ecuador".

[UPDATE: 2012-07-10 04:28 BST] Democracy Now! reported on the latest in Julian Assange's asylum bid.

Speaking to Democracy Now! over the weekend, Assange says he remains in good spirits and revealed that seven WikiLeaks staffers and volunteers are under grand jury investigation in the United States.

NSA whistleblower Thomas Drake was interviewed by RT and asked how angry the U.S. is at Julian Assange.

They are extremely angry. According to press reports, there has been a secret Grand Jury and maybe a secret indictment. They want to get him and put him away. There are those at high levels in this country – they have called for a death warrant.

Believe me, if the US get its hands on him – they’re going to do everything they can to put him away for as long as they can – or worse.

Speaking truth to power is very dangerous. The power elites, those in charge don’t like dirty linen being aired. They don’t like skeletons in the closet being seen. Not only do they object to it, they decide to turn it into criminal activity. Remember, my whistle blowing was criminalized by my own government.

[UPDATE: 2012-07-09 22:18 BST] Ecuador's ambassador to the U.S. Nathalie Cely expressed her concern about backlash if they accept Julian Assange into asylum, stating:

Giving asylum to Assange would be used as ammunition to attack the country.

She further said that the recriminations "already have begun", but that Ecuador is "ready as ever to defend our position and our decisions".

[UPDATE: 20:28 BST] Supporters in London continue to hold daily vigils outside the Ecuadorian Embassy in support of Julian Assange. The number of supporters usually increases in the afternoon, with the peak around 17:00.

Further contact information regarding the vigil is available from WISE UP for Bradley Manning.

[UPDATE: 17:10 BST] Julian Assange would have been in Sweden by this date, had he not chosen to seek political asylum from Ecuador. He continues to remain in the Embassy as the Ecuadorian Government considers his request. RT reported on the latest in Mr Assange's extradition bid:

[UPDATE: 2012-07-07 00:50 BST] The Foro de São Paulo, a political conference of organisations from Latin America and the Caribbean, called on the Government of Ecuador to grant Julian Assange political asylum to "save his life and liberty".

The U.S. Ambassador to Ecuador Adam Namm commented on Mr Assange's asylum bid, saying the White House had "aspired to justice" regarding WikiLeaks, but is not involved in the asylum discussions.

The Australian Greens have called on Foreign Minister Bob Carr to "show the same vigour" in defending Julian Assange as they showed in securing the release of lawyer Melinda Taylor.

Glenn Greenwald was on Democracy Now! discussing Mr Assange's bid for political asylum, as well as the release of the Syria Files. Watch the interview below:

[UPDATE: 17:42 BST] WikiLeaks held a press conference earlier today to announce the release of The Syria Files, over 2 million emails from 680 Syria-related entities or domain names.

Glenn Greenwald was on Democracy Now! discussing the latest developments in Julian Assange's asylum bid, as well as the release of the Syria Files. Watch the interview below:

[UPDATE: 05:06 BST] WikiLeaks will be holding a "major release" press conference at the Frontline Club today at 11AM (London time). The event will be live-streamed.

Further information about the conference is unavailable, but an hour earlier (11AM Sweden time/10AM London time) WikiLeaks spokesman Kristinn Hrafnsson and lawyer Jennifer Robinson will be holding a press conference at Almedalen in Sweden.

[UPDATE: 01:15 BST] Ecuador's Foreign Minister Ricardo Patiño commented on one of the allegations against Julian Assange: that he supposedly broke a condom on purpose. He described the allegation as "hilarious" and said "it's a bit naive" to believe these allegations are the main reason for Sweden to request the extradition of Mr Assange.

[UPDATE: 00:55 BST] Ecuadorian diplomat Abel Molina was interviewed about Julian Assange's decision to seek asylum, in which he stated that Sweden's attempt to extradite Mr Assange from the UK is just a facade for political intentions of the U.S. Government.

Image [UPDATE: 2012-07-05 00:45 BST] On July 4, around 60 people gathered at the Foreign Ministry in Quito, Ecuador to express their support for Julian Assange.

An article in El Telégrafo discussed the possible outcome whether Ecuador chooses to grant or deny political asylum for Mr Assange. If granted, the UK would need to agree on a safe passage for Mr Assange to Ecuador. If denied, Mr Assange would be arrested and extradited to Sweden.

[UPDATE: 19:40 BST] Ecuadorian Foreign Minister Ricardo Patino commented today on Julian Assange's application for political asylum (translated from Spanish).

We believe the issue has so much international impact [...] that we will take the time to sufficiently document the justification of the decision we make. [There] will be tens and perhaps hundreds of pages to explain our decision on the asylum request of Mr Assange.

He also commented that they are still gathering information about the Swedish allegations against Mr Assange. He mentioned that they have not even started judicial proceedings, and that Ecuador would not accept the extradition of people for questioning.

[UPDATE: 2012-07-04 16:05 BST] EFF's Trevor Timm appeared on The Alyona Show to discuss the ongoing investigation into WikiLeaks and renewed call to prosecute Julian Assange. He talks about how the WikiLeaks Grand Jury threatens the press freedoms of journalists everywhere. Watch the video below:

Icelandic MP and former WikiLeaks volunteer Birgitta Jónsdóttir has been warned not to visit the U.S. The Department of Justice previously attempted to hack her Twitter account due to her work with WikiLeaks. She comments:

The WTF (the CIA's WikiLeaks Task Force) has been building a case against Assange and others from WikiLeaks for two years. There is no doubt there is a grand jury in action. There is no doubt that the US wants to get even with WikiLeaks. Assange has every reason to worry about being extradited to the US, be it from Britain or Sweden, or any country that cannot or will not give him a guarantee against extradition. The best possible solution to the current situation is for Sweden to provide such guarantees. If there were the will, it could be done.

Read her full article via The Guardian.

Crikey's Bernard Keane wrote on the increasing U.S. Government harassment of WikiLeaks and Assange associates. He details the harassment of Jacob Appelbaum, Icelandic MP Birgitta Jónsdóttir, Jêrêmie Zimmermann, Smari McCarthy, WikiLeaks lawyer Jennifer Robinson, and filmmaker Laura Poitras.

U.S. Ambassador to Australia Jeffrey Bleich says Julian Assange is not being targeted by the U.S. According to him, Mr Assange could be extradited to the U.S. "as easily from the UK or from Sweden". These statements come despite an ongoing investigation into WikiLeaks and renewed calls for the prosecution of Mr Assange. Mr Assange stated in his interview from the Ecuadorian Embassy two weeks ago that WikiLeaks has "received subpoenas, the subpoenas mention my name". During testimony in Bradley Manning's court proceedings, Special Agent Mark Mander stated that seven civilians, including "founders, owners, or managers of WikiLeaks", are being targeting by the WikiLeaks Grand Jury.

Author William Blum wrote on "The Persecution of Julian Assange". He discusses how Ecuador and its president, Rafael Correa, will likely be targeted by the U.S. if they decide to provide Mr Assange asylum.

You think with the whole world watching, the United States would not intervene in Ecuador?

Read the full article via Counter Currents.

John Pilger was interviewed by Ecuadorian TV about Julian Assange and his decision to seek asylum. The interview is available to watch on YouTube (Spanish only).

[UPDATE: 2012-07-03 01:00 BST] RT America covered the evidence of the U.S. pursuit of Julian Assange. EFF's Trevor Timm is interviewed about the matter. Watch the video below:

Despite the renewed calls for U.S. prosecution of Julian Assange, and the Justice Department admitting a continued investigation into WikiLeaks, Australian Foreign Minister Bob Carr holds his belief that Mr Assange is of little interest to the U.S.

Glenn Greenwald wrote on the renewed calls to prosecute Mr Assange, commenting on how "there is no sense in which Feinstein’s denunciation applies to WikiLeaks but not to The New York Times".

Julian Assange's Swedish lawyer Per E Samuelson wrote an op-ed in The Guardian about how his client would not receive fair trial in Sweden.

This treatment is degrading. No one should be treated as guilty until proven innocent. There has been no trial, let alone conviction. Assange has not even been charged with any crime. And the situation makes it difficult for him to prepare his defence. If a defendant is placed in isolation they are allowed contact only with their defence lawyer. The prosecutor and complainants, however, can confer at length with witnesses and work out their strategies. Is there any acceptable reason why one of the parties be deprived of that opportunity?

Read the full article here.

[UPDATE: 23:30 BST] Mary Kostakidis, former anchor for SBS World News, gave an interview with Voice of Russia regarding Julian Assange's asylum bid. She discusses a letter she wrote to the Ecuadorian Government urging them to accept his application. She also discusses the support from the Ecuadorians, how Mr Assange is doing, and the Australian Government's failure to assist him.

[UPDATE: 2012-07-01 15:20 BST] Alongside the U.S. Justice Department confirming continued investigation into WikiLeaks, the Chariman of the Senate Select Committee on Intelligence, Dianne Feinstein, said the following in a written statement:

I believe Mr Assange has knowingly obtained and disseminated classified information which could cause injury to the United States. He has caused serious harm to US national security, and he should be prosecuted accordingly.

2012-07-02 REVEALED! WikiLeaks' SHOCKING Unpublished Revelations!

WikiLeaks releases have shaken global politics and provoked countless news headlines. Founder Julian Assange has rarely been out of the media spotlight. And yet WikiLeaks' greatest revelations have scarcely been noticed by mainstream media journalists. Here at last, we expose the full story behind the stories that the corporate media are too scared to touch!

Ignore for the moment all the actual, fact-packed contents of WikiLeaks releases. Instead, let us examine how various powerful groups - including the media, politicians, the military, corporations, and regulatory bodies - have mis-reported, spun, denied or suppressed these facts.

Only then do we begin to perceive WikiLeaks greatest unpublished revelations: not the information itself, nor the distorted reactions to the leaked information, nor even the reactions to the messengers of this information - but what all these distortions, suppressions, and endless attacks on WikiLeaks and Julian Assange tell us about the true nature of the society we live in.

A few key examples will suffice to paint a picture that is all too-clear to many.

COLLATERAL MURDER

WikiLeaks' award-winning work around the globe was largely ignored by the media until the explosive release of the "Collateral Murder" video on April 5th, 2010. So how did media, politicians and the US military react to this atrocity, a clear War Crime by any logical and humane interpretation of that concept?

Although Bradley Manning would not be arrested for another month, rumours of the existence of the 2007 video had long been circulating. Reuters were denied an FOI request for a copy. US officials had plenty of time to organise a damage control exercise. The undeniable shock of the nauseating televised violence was immediately "balanced" by senior officials promising a full investigation. Media anchors willingly acquiesced to their demands that judgement be postponed until a convenient "context" could be established.

And yet these same officials and journalists had already decided on WikiLeaks's guilt: Assange was immediately condemned as an irresponsible, egotistical anarchist. Demands for his assassination began to appear. The search for the unknown leaker soon became the main story, and within weeks Bradley Manning was being tortured in a Quantico brig.

Around the globe, officials in US client states like Australia echoed the White House talking points. The media also towed the line. Reuters EIC David Schlesinger spiked a story suggesting that the attack on his own staff members constituted a War Crime. The Washington Post denied having sat on the video for a year.

At the time, US officials must have considered this quite a successful damage control operation. Most of the domestic TV-watching public saw only snatches of the video, with multiple "expert" caveats. But international observers, and those accessing online information sources, could easily see the truth behind the propaganda. Truth will out: the leading YouTube version of the attacks currently has over twelve and a half million views.

FINANCIAL BLOCKADE

As another example of media and political reaction, consider the global blockade on WikiLeaks by financial giants including MasterCard, Visa and PayPal. WikiLeaks poses no obvious threat to their operations, and of course neo-Nazis and other extremist groups remain free to use their services. So this blockade reveals a shocking bias, and sets a very dangerous precedent.

The blockade exposes not just political influence on global finance, but also political influence on global media, plus financial influence on global politics. And it is astonishing how widespread and uniform such influence appears to be across the Western world.

Why haven't politicians, economists and the media taken more interest in this "non-story"? Are we all supposed to just shrug and ignore it? Apparently so. Yes, the blockade was reported (minimally), but the broader implications have been totally ignored. And that's the real story here.

LEVESON INQUIRY

For a similar WikiLeaks "non-story", consider Julian Assange's submissions to the UK Leveson enquiry. Assange rightly claims to have been unfairly maligned by the UK press. But how is it possible that nearly every major Western media outlet has either steadfastly ignored him or adopted a negative stance? In the retail sector, such evidence would be grounds for an investigation into collusion.

Indeed, while UK media organisations have dutifully reported daily events at the Leveson inquiry, they have largely ignored the evidence itself, prompting @GuidoFawkes blogger Paul Staines to publish some of the Operation Motorman leaks, which he describes as "Britain's biggest establishment cover-up".

"Currently in Britain the newspapers are neither naming nor shaming because the criminal enterprises are the newspapers themselves, who understandably do not wish to report their own crimes," says Staines.

In Assange's case, the most guilty newspaper is (ironically) former partner The Guardian, which now leads the UK Establishment's attack on WikiLeaks. Even more ironically, the Leveson inquiry would never have happened without Guardian EIC Alan Rusbridger's dogged pursuit of Rupert Murdoch. So how do you explain such a peculiarly selective brand of outrage? Oddly enough, nobody is even trying.

Addressing complaints of anti-WikiLeaks bias, even the Guardian's Reader's Editor would only promise not to use the word "charges" to describe Assange's Swedish allegations. Readers comments were again predictably scathing. But it seems such major UK media organisations would rather insult their readers' intelligence than speak up for Assange and WikiLeaks, even as they drift towards financial oblivion.

BRADLEY MANNING

Another WikiLeaks "non-story" is the US government's treatment of Bradley Manning, the young soldier who ALLEGEDLY (there's still no conclusive proof, and probably never will be, given the farcical nature of his US military trial) passed a treasure trove of files to WikiLeaks. Manning was tortured by the US government in solitary confinement for six months, and now faces a show trial that is barely being covered by domestic US media.

The studiously ignored question is: "Why?" Under international law, it is a crime for a soldier NOT to reveal knowledge of war crimes. In a saner world, Bradley Manning would be celebrated as a US national hero who helped bring two unjust wars to a close, while those responsible for the crimes he exposed would be brought to justice. Yet Ron Paul is the only senior US politician currently championing Manning's cause (and the media ignore him too). Why?

This is the real revelation here. Why are the US media actively ignoring Manning's trial and his altruistic motivations, while giving short shrift to any sympathetic opinions? Is the US media not allowed to even canvass ideas that do not conform to Pentagon strategy? Is that the true state of US media today, 35 years since the CIA boasted about having a spy in every major newsrooom?

The sub-plot in this "non-story" is that the US government appears to have been pressuring Manning to blame Assange for his actions, and has set up a Grand Jury to find more excuses to extradite Assange and lock him away. Meanwhile the FBI flipped LulzSec hacker Sabu, who allegedly offered to sell the leaked Stratfor emails to WikiLeaks. Was that operation designed to entrap WikiLeaks? Are these threads all aspects of a grand US government conspiracy to destroy WikiLeaks and make an example of Assange?

AUSTRALIA AND SWEDEN

The casual brutality of Washington's reaction will have shocked nobody who has been paying any attention to the USA's accelerating slide towards Fascism. But many have been surprised by the slavish public reactions of the Australian and Swedish governments, who are now exposed as willing tools of US imperialism, ready to ignore the law, invite international ridicule, sacrifice innocent citizens, and even lose power to opposition parties rather than speak up for truth and justice.

Sweden's reputation as a forward-thinking nation of sexually liberated citizens has been trashed. Foreign Minister Carl Bildt's friendship with US neocon Karl Rove appears to be the new cornerstone of Swedish foreign policy. Behind the cosmopolitan facade of Stockholm, we see a provincial town still in the grip of an 18th Century Lutheran witch-hunt mentality.

In Canberra, Prime Minister Julia Gillard has lost credibility and irreparably damaged the reputation of the Labor Party, whose back-room ties to the US Embassy were already exposed by WikiLeaks. It's hard to think of anyone who has come out of this long WikiLeaks saga looking worse than the Gillard government, whose Foreign Minister and Attorney General have plumbed Orwellian depths of reality-denial. Of course, Assange can expect little better from the opposition Coalition, whose complicity is confirmed by their silence. Meanwhile the Greens, a growing, credible and courageous third force, remain potential king-makers in any future elections.

Obviously Assange's Australian citizenship and the sexual allegations in Sweden make these nations central to any WikiLeaks discussion. But around the world today, millions of citizens are dismayed at how their supposedly democratic governments ignore popular will while pandering to global financiers and US-dominated corporations.

CONSPIRACIES, OPINIONS AND FACTS

We could continue examining many, many more examples of government and media silence and collusion against WikiLeaks.

But at some point we have to look beyond the latest scandal, recognise a clear pattern, and draw some conclusions. And what we see can only be described as a massive anti-WikiLeaks conspiracy.

Many supporters have described the process of following WikiLeaks as a journey "down the rabbit hole". Can you handle the truth? It is indeed hard for people to reassess attitudes and opinions that have been brain burned. But the facts exposed by WikiLeaks, and the reactions to those revelations, are matters of fact, and must be respected in any rational society. And those facts point to a complex, far-ranging conspiracy.

Let us be clear: this enormous conspiracy of media, politicians, the military, corporations and private business has not arisen purely in response to WikiLeaks. It has been growing steadily for at least 50 years. But WikiLeaks has clearly and cleverly exposed it. And that, in my humble opinion, is WikiLeaks' greatest revelation.

Censorship reveals fear, as Julian Assange says. And the conspiracy participants' attempts to smear Assange and silence WikiLeaks have exposed their fears.

So why are our global leaders afraid of the truth? What have they got to hide? And why are the media aiding and abetting this conspiracy? Stay tuned...

NOTES

1. Of course, the media reflexively dismiss anything they can label a "conspiracy theory". Politicians refuse to even discuss "hypotheticals". But they will all discuss ad nauseam conspiracy theories such as President Obama's birth certificate, or hypothetical plans to invade Iran or Syria. Double standards are easily exposed.

2. It is obviously not fair to tar all journalists with the same brush: a few dedicated professionals have done outstanding work in support of WikiLeaks, Assange and Manning. It's no coincidence that most of these journalists work predominantly online. And it's no coincidence that those involved in the conspiracy are actively working to crush Internet freedoms.

3. Many support the conspiracy unwittingly, such as wannabe alt.media writers whose negative opinions of Assange are informed by mainstream media smears, or well-meaning but time-poor politicians who vote along party lines without checking the facts for themselves. These people can be reached.

4. The situation today is precarious. We are in an Information War, a race against time, with advancing technology benefiting either the peace-loving people of this world, or our war-mongering oppressors. Our governments today are busy closing legal loopholes and imposing restrictive controls on the Internet. If they succeed, there may never be another WikiLeaks. Get active.

5. It's Julian Assange's birthday today. Happy birthday, mate.

2012-07-03 #JA41

Julian Assange celebrates his 41st birthday Tuesday 3 July 2012. The celebration may be at 3 Hans Crescent in Knightsbridge, or in a Swedish remand prison, or in the custody of the United States, or in Ecuador. But we want him to know, wherever he'll be, how much we all appreciate what he's done for us. Send your birthday greets to Julian at ja41@wlcentral.org - or with the Twitter tag #JA41.

2012-06-17 What #JA41 means to me (Central)

I'm one of four people currently running WLC. We took over about four months ago. Several members of the current team were in at the beginning and helped launch WLC. That was back on 17 November 2010. Going on two years ago.

There's been a lot of water under the bridge since then, through all of the year 2010 when our lives and our world were turned topsy-turvy.

The increasing prevalence of 'sharing' on the InterWebs gave birth to new social media such as Twitter and to the emergence on 5 April 2010 of the natural force known as Julian Assange and WikiLeaks.

No longer were we to trust our duly elected representatives to tell us the truth. Julian's WikiLeaks showed us in a dramatic way how much they lied right in our faces, what unspeakable war crimes they committed without our knowing, what injustices they perpetrated with such calm panache.

We learned that the MSM were essentially worthless. We learned to dig for the facts ourselves. We learned to trust Julian Assange and WikiLeaks to bring us the truth as no one has ever done before. We suddenly felt like we were on the cusp of a new era in our civilisation.

The very idea of a completely anonymous and impenetrable news submission system broke all the rules. The organisations of the MSM such as the Guardian, the Rupert Murdoch outlets, and the New York Times were dealt a blow from which they will never recover.

As the events of the summer and autumn of 2010 unfolded, we learned that our own research gave us far more accurate results than the MSM ever cared about.

And we made a lot of new friends.

The genie's out of the bottle. Never to go back in again. And Julian Assange, the founder of the International Subversives, coauthor of Underground, member of the Realm, and founder of WikiLeaks and so many other things: he's a man of the times. He can hack, he has his heart in the right place, he's extraordinarily insightful, and he has changed our lives and our world forever.

Here's to Julian Assange on #JA41. May it be the best of all possible birthdays. And many many many many happy returns.

WL Central are currently collecting tweets (#JA41) and email greetings to Julian Assange to be published 2 July, the day before his birthday.

2012-06-20 What #JA41 means to me (Graham)

After a debate with a colleague about WikiLeaks, I was told "Assange stole our Graham".

Assange didn't steal me, nor did he steal a host of others who stand firm on their belief systems of truth, justice, and holding governments to account. I happen to have a moral compass that aligns with those people, who would also seem to share my beliefs: that the state can be wrong, that the state can commit crimes, that the state can lie and get away with it and that laws do not necessarily serve to protect their people but incriminate them, and that such laws should be changed.

Assange is a beacon in the world of media and journalism. A world in which special interests take precedence, in which the word 'journalism' has been reduced in definition to 'government mouth piece' and has lost all sense of objectivity and truthfulness.

This man managed to piss people off by never interjecting his opinion in any of his published material. When did journalism become something where you have to please everyone? When did journalism and media become this thing where someone's work is only good if it correctly communicates your personal viewpoint?

Why is there no respect for a man who is only following his convictions, and holding the unaccountable accountable while doing it? A man who does not publish op-eds and grace prime time news channels for interviews, galavanting his opinion across nations? How is it that such a man is not revered, but reviled?

For all that is wrong with journalism in the 21st century. For the amount of mass disinformation out there influencing people's decisions. For the complicity in journalists to fuel that disinformation. For all the injustices that happen around the world and are not addressed, while criminals of all sorts walk free. For fighting these things, and standing up for the principles of journalism, for exposing government crimes and creating an unrivaled publishing platform on which to do it, Julian Assange is an inspiration.

In a place where people cave instead of standing up for what they believe, Julian Assange and WikiLeaks have singlehandedly changed the media landscape and pushed for new levels of accountability not just from governments, but from journalists. This is worthy of our respect and our thanks, and somebody whose actions gives me hope.

WL Central are currently collecting tweets (#JA41) and email greetings to Julian Assange to be published 2 July, the day before his birthday.

2012-06-28 What #JA41 means to me (Ben)

Ben is journalism student at Edith Cowan University in Perth Australia. One in a series.

A couple of weeks ago, travelling south toward Perth under foreboding grey skies with a good wingman of mine, conversation turned to WikiLeaks, and in particular Julian Assange.

"The thing I am worried about", my wingman explained, "is how can I trust WikiLeaks to filter information?"

"Assange has become the new gatekeeper!"

It was, I thought, a very good question.

I didn't have an immediate answer to it. Some matters require a bit of thought and, though I tried to waggle my tongue around it, it is only in hindsight that the answer has properly articulated itself.

It's all too easy to valorise Julian Assange. There's a certain rebel romance around him. He is above and beyond the ken of most journalists.

A convicted hacker, an idealist, an Internet evangelist and now, just over two years since he founded WikiLeaks, a potential sacrificial lamb for the military industrial complex.

The United States of America, arguably the greatest empire the world has ever known, wants him on the altar - whatever it takes.

There he is: an International Man of Mystery, a white-haired fox, a pop icon who has appeared on everything from the 500th episode of The Simpsons to the big screen at the Splendour In The Grass music festival.

Footage exists on YouTube of Assange tearing up the dance floor in a Reykjavík nightclub. There is an overwhelming sense, no doubt fostered by the man himself, that he is one of us.

It seems entirely plausible that if it wasn't him taking on the system, it would be someone else. Indeed, as his birthday rapidly approaches it's worth suggesting that he is very much a product of his time.

The 41 years since his birth have given ordinary people the greatest voice they have ever had.

As the US government and corporate America have tightened their stranglehold on the world, quietly in the background grassroots forces have arisen that transcend the modernist, material thought that produced the very system that Assange challenges.

The Internet is the obvious one, and it has become the greatest ally of democratic political movements, such as the community-minded global Greens and their ostensible obverse, the libertarians.

There is a great deal of disagreement between them, but to a greater or lesser extent both ideologies repudiate the power nodes that have become ubiquitous since the onset of the Cold War: unaccountable governments, and unaccountable corporations.

For Julian Assange, who developed his worldview as the Cold War came to a close, those corporate and government power structures are one and the same. They both must be transparent, and held to account. They must not be allowed to lie and deceive the public, because ultimately their decisions affect all of us.

It is easy to see why these two schools of political thought - one old and traditionalist, one new and progressive - have been arguably the only people in government to defend him.

But these are strange times indeed.

Even the American paleoconservative Pat Buchanan, who - for goodness' sake - served in the Nixon and Reagan administrations, has called vehemently for the American Empire to be reigned in, rolled back - to get their military noses out of the business of the world.

Assange's worldview is that of the zeitgeist. People of all stripes are tired of being lied to, and fed the same old lines about 'democracy' and 'freedom'.

It would be utterly unfair to foist upon him any ideological standpoint other than his own, but what Assange has essentially done is to cut through these myths like a hot knife through butter.

The current witch-hunt is case in point, and the reactions of the British, Swedish and American authorities - and indeed the non-action of their Australian counterparts - only serve to validate his position.

In putting his own life on the line, he has both confirmed the suspicions of a generation, and given us hope for a better world.

I'm a journalist, of sorts, and also a musician, and there is one other parallel that I think bears a mention: the growth of independent music.

As the teenage Julian Assange hacked away in the late 1980s, underground musicians created networks across America - and indeed, around the world - in which corporate control was entirely eschewed.

This changed, briefly, in the mid-1990s, but with the rise of the Internet and simultaneous to the utterly unjust and transparent wars of the new century, the notions of independent thought and artistic expression have come back with a vengeance.

Not for everybody, of course, but for the educated - the middle class - the ideas are flowing. And Assange is the stylish nerd on the front line.

Thinking back to that day, driving south, under grey skies, I'm drawn to the context of the trip.

We were returning from a visit to Moore River, where successive Western Australian governments and private businesses have colluded for decades to push a real estate development which would be unsustainable, unnecessary, environmentally disastrous and quite simply not wanted by the local community.

The issue is small-fry, compared to Assange, but again it pits the interests of the community against governments and businesses with no accountability.

At this time in history, the themes are universal.

So, as we pushed on into the approaching darkness, conversation between my wingman and myself turned to the mainstream media. They would have us believe that Assange is a dangerous threat to democracy, an outlaw, and quite possibly a rapist. The Americans want him dead.

Surely everyone on the planet sees through that?

"I guess", offered my wingman, an ever-insightful gentlemen, "I have spent my entire adult life listening to [1980s American underground punk band] the Dead Kennedys. I question everything I hear. Other people might not."

As all these themes converged, much like the mainstream media itself continues to do, the answer to the question of WikiLeaks' role as just another information gatekeeper began to emerge.

In the age of Gina Rinehart and Rupert Murdoch, of the military industrial complex and privatised prison systems, duopolies, gutted unions, surveillance societies, social control, militarised police forces and perpetual global war, Julian Assange has offered us the one thing that democracy desperately needs for its survival: plurality.

He has given us options.

WL Central are currently collecting tweets (#JA41) and email greetings to Julian Assange to be published 2 July, the day before his birthday.

2012-06-29 What #JA41 means to me (GMason)

Heroes come in all shapes, sizes, nationalities, and backgrounds. Some, like the Buddha, are born into luxury but abandon it all for the pursuit of truth. Others, raised as paupers, later attain wealth and fame that ultimately spring from their vision quests. Heroes hail from all over the globe, from New Guinea to New England. Because of such variation, it's not always easy to know when you're in the presence of one.

But there are a few clues, as heroes share some common characteristics. The hero's story often consists of a grueling journey in which the protagonist faces and passes many tests, in the process transforming himself and the world around him. More fundamentally, however, a hero is someone who makes a great sacrifice in order to attain higher goals.

Only Julian Assange can know the true measure of what he's surrendered for the sake of standing up to power and unleashing (via WikiLeaks) the torrent of torrid details of malfeasance by government agents around the world. Still, even a casual observer can see that sacrifice has long been Assange's companion. His biography reveals that the native Australian long ago gave up any chance of having a "normal" life (which might not have appealed to him, anyway). He's lived for decades without money or a home. An existence spent deflecting the ire of nation-states enraged by WikiLeaks disclosures has forced him to leave behind family members, as he's been pursued by the powerful around the globe; and such a life has most likely caused him to jettison other personal relationships. Initially deemed a wunderkind by the "insider" crowd, he's now been deserted by the mainstream media and others who instead opted to toe the line and kowtow to the powerful. At times, forced into a prison cell, spending time in solitary confinement, or confined to house arrest, he's lost his freedom. Public abandonment by his native land -- whose politicos appear to have thrown him to the wolves dwelling in Washington, DC -- means that, in effect, he's lost his country. He's even lost his haircolor. Yet in the process he's gained the status and stature of hero to many thousands, perhaps millions, of people throughout the world.

An often-overlooked aspect of heroes is the role that they tend to play in inspiring heroism in others. Like Assange, I am a journalist. Like Assange, I have provoked the hostility of certain government officials who understand that my work threatens to reveal secrets they'd rather keep hidden. Like Assange, I've given up creature comforts and all semblance of normality in the pursuit of truth, beauty, and essential change. And, like Assange, I imagine, I deal daily with the seeming absurdity of putting my life on the line for the sake of word and sound.

As I labor away in officially-enforced semi-obscurity, I've spent many days without food or any hope of clean clothes, lacking almost every amenity that most of my fellow U.S. citizens would consider "basic needs"; days of suffocating solitude; days when my body and spirit both feel so brutalized that the simple act of walking becomes a challenge. Yet now, during such moments, I often think of Julian Assange, who in the process of embodying heroism, has persevered despite seemingly insurmountable adversity, attained success against all odds, and sidestepped trap after trap set by his detractors. And that offers me a lifeline.

I'm not sure the world is ready yet for a female hero. But still I keep trying. Knowing that Julian Assange is alive in this world helps give me the faith and strength to continue. So for that I thank him.

WL Central are currently collecting tweets (#JA41) and email greetings to Julian Assange to be published 2 July, the day before his birthday.

2012-06-29 What #JA41 means to me (m_cetera)

There is no greater gift than the opening of one's eyes, and that is precisely what Julian Assange and WikiLeaks have given to me. As a U.S. citizen and military veteran, I cannot fully express how important this has been in my life.

It is not easy to change someone, but I can say I became a very different person upon discovery of WikiLeaks. I was changed from someone with a rather nihilistic point of view on the world to someone increasingly interested in current events and the well-being of others. My interest in WikiLeaks quickly grew to the North African revolutions, the Occupy movement, privacy laws, due process, and so much more.

What Julian Assange has done with WikiLeaks is create a way people can make up their own minds. With the current state of news media, it is nearly impossible to find a source of information with clear facts and no bias. Julian's "scientific journalism" - releasing the full source material along with articles - is an incredible development in the journalistic world.

I spend a good bit of my free time covering WikiLeaks news, writing the occasional analysis, and generally involving myself in any project possible. This is because I love the idea of WikiLeaks, what WikiLeaks has done, and what WikiLeaks is capable of doing in the future. I think it is something to be shared and spread to others, and positive, factual coverage of it is important in a world full of smears and lies.

Many career paths have crossed my mind before - Japanese translator, author, artist, librarian - but this autumn I will be starting at University to study journalism and political science, and I have WikiLeaks to thank for that decision.

Julian deserves so much. He has fought the odds and continued his work despite vicious attacks, calls for his assassination, banking blockades, nearly 600 days detained without charge, and so on. His continued fight in the face of adversity shows how strong and unbreakable his dedication to his cause truly is.

I wish Julian the best of luck in his bid for political asylum. I wish him further freedom in the future. I wish him the ability to continue his work. And I wish him happiness in a long, good life.

Happy 41st birthday, Julian. Another year outliving those bastards.

WL Central are currently collecting tweets (#JA41) and email greetings to Julian Assange to be published 2 July, the day before his birthday.

2012-07-03 #JA41 Greets

Julian Assange celebrates his 41st birthday Tuesday 3 July 2012. The celebration may be at 3 Hans Crescent in Knightsbridge, or in a Swedish remand prison, or in the custody of the United States, or in Ecuador. But we want him to know, wherever he'll be, how much we all appreciate what he's done for us. Send your birthday greets to Julian at ja41@wlcentral.org - or with the Twitter tag #JA41.

Greets currently from:

Alain, Amelia, Anna, Antonia, Beverly, Cheryl, Cristina, Dave, David, Dean, Debra, Diana, Douglas, Emmet, Enrica, Gena, George, Gretchen, Gus, Heather, Heather2, Holly, Ivan, Jac, Janet, Jaqi, Jason, Jenny, Joe, John, Jon, Judith, Karin, Kate, Kathlyn, Laura, Liz, Louisa, Lynda, Lynne, Maha, Marlene, Maysoon, Melanie, Michele, Nick, Nicola, Paola, Polly, Robyn, Rose, Sandy, Sara, Sergio, Sophie, Susanne, Sylke, Teclo, Trish, Tom, Victoria, 彭龙嘉.


Happy Birthday Mate,

Love many trust few & always paddle your own canoe, but remember there's a kaupapa behind you.

- Dean


Hey J,

Happy Birthday! Will party when you get home! Northern Rivers, Byron crew
send their love too.

- Love from Cheryl & family Gold Coast


Mendax:

You are the guiding light for my generation. Or at least the ones who pay attention.

I didn't believe it at first, but I agree now: courage really is contagious. Our generation has been lied to over and over again. None of our parents believe it and most of our friends don't care because they think that there's nothing they can do.

There are, however, a growing number of us with a burning desire for direct action despite the ignorance that surrounds us.

You have shown us all that constructive, ethical action is possible.

You give us hope.
You give me hope; I can't thank you enough.

I didn't bother celebrating my own birthday this year but I'm going to celebrate yours. The empowerment of others is the mark of a real hero, and of a man who's life ought to be celebrated. Did I mention that you F****** ROCK!?

Happy birthday!

- Tom


"Happy Birthday to You, Happy Birthday to You, Happy Birthday dear Jul-ian, Happy Birthday to YOU! Hip Hip Hooray, Hip Hip Hooray, Hip Hip Hooray!"

Hang in there our friend. Truth always wins in the end. Remember that. Wishing you love and continued strength (from Ballarat),

- Robyn and Brent :-)


Happy Birthday and many more free ones. You have made a tremendous impact in the world and have truly lived your days well. Courageous, intelligent, an inspiration to many. You have my whole hearted support!

Your friend in PA (state motto lol)

- Rose


Hello Julian,

A very happy birthday to you.

(Am now anticipating a knock at the door from a member of the CIA to change the batteries in my digital watch.)

- Dave


Happy Birthday Julian

One day there will be justice. We don't forget that!

Best wishes

- Karin


Julian you are an inspiration for all people who believe in freedom and that governments should work in the interest of those who they represent and whose taxes they are funded by.

Please keep on appealing to ECHR using the arguments that the Supreme Court here said your legal team had failed to produce. Your case raises vital questions of how the EAW is being used and interpreted.

Not only that but your voice and show on RT is very valuable and you must fight for your freedom and to keep out of the hands of your enemies.

May God bless you on your birthday and keep you from harm.

- Heather


It may be hard to think about having a happy birthday right now Julian. But please know you have many friends all over the world, like me, who believe in you, respect you, and care about you.

We will not give up fighting for you and supporting you. And we will continue speaking out and standing up for you.

Thank you for blazing the trail of truth and transparency.

- Michele

Support Whistleblowers Support WikiLeaks

All of us are at our best when we are pursuing an ideal that is important... I have made my days count. - Julian Assange


*Assange*
*
*
*happy birthday~~*

- 彭龙嘉


You have made every one of your days count. Now we will make them count even more.

Happy Birthday J. xx

- Debra


I wish you enjoy your birthday, despite your situation, you marked the beginning of a change you has shown that in addition to intelligence and technique it takes courage I have great respect for your work. You are great person. I appreciate that in this pathetic world there are people like you.

I hope you celebrate many more birthdays !!!

Saludos desde Costa Rica.

- Victoria


Thank you for all you have done in the name of Freedom.

Best

- Anna Ft Bragg CA


Wishing your truth-telling changes governments around the world...

- Jon & Kande


Happy Birthday Brother!

Keep up the good fight. The whole world is watching, and may you prevail in the end!

We love you!

- David Mendocino California US


Hi there Julian,

I'm some random woman in the US who is remarkably grateful for the work you've done to hold organizations and governments accountable for their actions. I've been lucky enough to participate in a friend's audio recording project around the work you've done toward publishing truth in electronic form. Thank you for making this world a more honest place. Thank you for standing in integrity against great evil by being willing to point out that these emperors have not only no clothes but kick the dogs too (so to speak). From one random person in CA, just know that you've empowered US citizens to continue in activism and that people the world over are glad for that. I really hope that in some small ways you are able to have an enriched existence. Throughout the coming year I wish you strength, affection, and health.

Have a brilliant birthday.

Cheers,

- Amelia


Thinking of you and thanking you for your work.

- Joe and Maggie


Dear Julian,

You are a modern day hero. I am so moved, in many dimensions, by the revolutionary work you have been doing. It changes the whole paradigm of politics as usual. Confronting truths you have revealed to the world is profound in so many ways. You have offered hope to millions, like me, who care about the truth, and we watching, wishing you justice, freedom and the place in history at a time when the truth arises from the shadows and becomes legitimate.

Happy Birthday!

- Liz, Caspar California


Best Wishes to you on your birthday.

- Nick


Happy Birthday Julian,

The world is better place because you are here, we are with you, you are not alone.

- Maysoon


Dear Julian,

We, who have observed the workings of both those operating with dark purposes and those working to shed and spread the light, know that what you have done, are doing, is noble and necessary. This is indeed the last ride at the end of the old world. May your bicycle tires be buoyed up with the many breaths of support offered by us who respect and love you.

- Jenny, fellow citizen of the world, Mendocino County, California


Dear Julian:

I'm sending birthday greetings on behalf of my publicist, Emma Goldstein.

Emma called her Great-Aunt Sophie to let her know that you had flown the coop. Aunt Sophie emailed her back.

Best wishes,

- Holly, Mendocino California

--
24 June 2012

Dear Emma:

I was distraught when you phoned to tell me that nice Mr Assange had fled to the Ecuadorian Embassy in London. I hope he brought his laptop and a change of clothes, and that there is decent broadband in Quito.

His timing was good, though, as Gertie and Maud had driven up for the midsummer bonfire. We carried a year's worth of burnables out onto Ilkley Moor, and at midnight we set them alight. There were fires all across the Calder Valley, and we hoped other crones were also doing workings for Mr Assange.

Maud opened a bottle of Bendover Oil she had purchased on a trip to New Orleans, and rubbed the foul-smelling stuff on James Ball's column in the Grauniad and upon the nether regions of a poppet with dark red hair and a triangular smile. "She mustn't be a country music fan", said Gertie, "Or she would have heeded Dolly Parton's advice, 'If you're gonna have your face done, have 'em take a nip here and a tuck there, so you don't end up lookin' like a banjo head'."

Maud also brought along her corgi, Little Fudgie, who did not stop yapping until I threatened to roast him over the fire. He ran under the Mini, and cowered, whimpering, until we finished the ritual and brought out the cakes and wine.

We imbibed quite a lot of Guinness and ate several of Maud's brownies, so the circle we cast was a bit lopsided. As at every Solstice, we sang old Steeleye Span songs about sheep, and Maud, who had perhaps eaten too many brownies, channeled Maddie Prior. She hoisted her petticoat a bit above her knee, and nimbly danced round the fire, until she tripped over Nigel the iguana. Once we bandaged her ankle she grew maudlin, and wept for the fate of an buachaill ban, the fair-haired boy. Soon we were all clinging to one another, moaning. It may not have been the strongest cone of power we ever raised, but it was the most heartfelt.

It looks as though we shall have to wait until next week to see if our protection spell worked. On Tuesday I'll take the bus down to London for my annual shopping trip. The Ecuadorian Embassy is behind Harrod's, where I plan to purchase bathing costumes for Nigel and myself.

I am worried that Mr Assange is not eating properly. Llamaburgers, potatoes, and fried guinea pig do not constitute a balanced diet for a man who needs to think clearly, so I hope to drop by the Embassy with a couple of strawberry-rhubarb pies. Little Fudgie, unfortunately, gobbled the last of the brownies. We yelled at him and he got sick on the Gillard doll.

I am also concerned that Mr Assange may be haunted by the ghost of Princess Diana, or worse, Dodi. If he starts writing thank-you notes, we may have to to do an exorcism.

Your doting Aunt,

Sophie


THE GEEK SHALL INHERIT THE EARTH
An Unofficial WikiLeaks Multinational Anthem
Words © Holly Rights Reserved
Tune: Brisbane Ladies, Queensland cattle drovers' song

You geeks and geekettes who toil for your wages
At the edge of the vast electronic frontier
Too long have we slaved in our cubicle cages
Too long have we all been imprisoned by fear.

When bankers get bonuses measured in millions
While midwives are jailed for assisting a birth
When generals lie about killing civilians
Then it's time for the geek to inherit the earth.

From Cairo to London, Beijing to Seattle
From Berkeley to Madison, Melbourne to Perth
We'll boot up our laptops and gear up for battle
And the day that the geek shall inherit the earth.

Though envious critics hold us in derision
And newspapers lie about what we have done
We'll network together and forge our new vision
And support one another until we have won.

In vain do they call for our death and damnation
In vain do they call us a terrorist threat
In vain do they lock us in cruel isolation
We'll still keep on spreading the truth on the net.

From Cairo to London, Beijing to Seattle
From Berkeley to Madison, Melbourne to Perth
We'll boot up our laptops and gear up for battle
And the day that the geek shall inherit the earth.

When down-trodden prisoners are freed and befriended
We'll crown our success with music and mirth
When the dreary Dork Ages have finally ended
Then the bold-hearted geek shall inherit the earth.

[Whatever decision you make, I'll continue to support you. Wish I could send you a pizza.]

Carrying on the fight for Internet freedom from the edge of the earth,

Your friend

- Holly, Mendocino California
--
Genius is not a gift. It is the way out one invents in desperate situations. - Jean-Paul Sartre


Dear Mr Assange,

So you're turning 41, let me tell you, you don't look like it. :-P

But seriously, what does one wish you? The strange white haired guy who has the courage to embarrass and challenge the most powerful governments and who gets ripped apart by the media all over the world, but is loved and supported by millions nevertheless. A tough one...

I celebrate my birthday two days before yours and everything I wish for my birthday is your freedom. Not only that Sweden/US/Australia/UK (choose your favourite) will give in, no. I mean the freedom that you can continue with your work, that you can travel wherever you want to and that you continue enriching this world with your passion, vision and courage, because this is the most precious thing you gave us. Honestly? I have no idea how you bear all that. I guess I got the plan, that the media attention is important, I understood it earlier as you confirmed it for the media, but still, your strength makes me speechless.

Oh and there's another birthday wish of mine... I wish I could stand in the rain in the front of the fence of the Ecuadorian Embassy in London as a sign of support for you. The young people nowadays have strange wishes, don't they? Crazy world. I guess partly you're to blame for this. And at the end of the day, you are guilty. Guilty, that you gave us the taste of salt, which made us long for... a better world... no, that quote was different... anyway. ;)

From the bottom of my heart (if there is one) I wish you a Happy Birthday and even more strength and determination to continue your path. You are not alone and you will never be, even if it may feel like it sometimes.

- Melanie


Dear Mr Assange

Thank you for being you. Bless the day you were born. Best to you and your family!

May you have a joyful, active, free and prosperous year.

Sincerely

- Antonia


Dear Julian

Happy Birthday

Love & best wishes

Thank you for all you have done for us all

- Nicola, Adelaide


Dear Julian,

Happy birthday and best wishes.

Cheers,

- Gena


Just a couple of days more, you don't really know what's next, we don't either.

You've been supporting us. Be sure we'll be supporting you, I wish I could be like you. but all I can be is an honest man, that's all.

You're the boss. Keep being yourself. And never surrender to the oppression. My best wishes for you.

Happy Birthday, Julian Assange!

- Ivan


Happy Birthday brother.

Love,

- Jason


Julian,

I'm sure around 15 years ago, your image of where your life would be today was nothing like what faces you now. And just as I'm sure you'll be getting a hundred thousand or so birthday wishes, and this one won't (and shouldn't) stand out, your efforts reflect exactly this sentiment of so many individuals blurred into a large, mass identity. It seems you've done what you've done for this: our collective well-being - this mass identity outside the few who hold power. I don't know the nuances of your charges, only the basics, or even a clue of the workings of how you've done what you've done. But, as an avid reader, I do see your intentions as good for the millions outside a realm of "mattering" in this world's governance. I've followed your story closely, and feel my lack of understanding is based in the reporting versus your transparency.

And for that, albeit the level of incarceration, I hope that your humanity isn't stripped of all that brings you joy. I hope that for no one on this earth. I hope on your birthday, you'll remember to dance, laugh, and know that wherever you are assigned to be, your ripple is so much larger than the charges against you. Please let it allow you to sleep well at night.

Happy Birthday, sir. I wish I could give some memories to you for your lost time, like when I got to spend time in Byron Bay a couple of years back, eating fresh catches and giggling at the fire dancers at dusk. Although, I have to say, the insipid Australian cliched phrase (and almost grammatical clitic) "no worries" isn't quite apropos here. So, I'll revert to American ones, "high five" for the past and "game on" for the future! And to many more birthdays better than this one...

Best,

- Gretchen


Happy Birthday M Julian Assange!

You can be proud of what you did!

And I will support you everywhere on this planet.

Hope you will have a good new for your birthday.

Cordialement

- Alain


Hello Julian,

Just want you to know that many people are rooting for you and hope for the outcome of your desires. We appreciate your bringing to light the dirty underside of government. Thank you for your bravery and dedication.

With admiration for your work,

- Judith, California


Keep Going J !!!

- Emmet


Dear Julian,

I admire and respect your work so far, but you still have a lot of work in the future. Hold on. Happy birthday. I wish you all the best. Greetings from Warsaw Poland.

- Jac


Mr Assange,

Your courage, motivation, and presence has helped me to understand the world I live in and how we can change it.

I'm forever grateful.

Happy birthday.

- Kate


Dear Mr Assange,

It was years ago that I read on WikiLeaks the documents on Trafigura. Because of the seriousness of what was going on, I assumed the media would be all over this matter. And then nothing happened. And I was confused.

I returned to a state of uneasy passiveness. WikiLeaks shook me awake in 2010. Thank you for that! And then I saw a video of your appearance in the European parliament. That's when I learned about gag orders.

As I watch how you are treated, I can't believe how malicious and bad the powers that be are.I wish our politicians would have your courage. You and your team are really amazing.

I wish you all the best. And, although not in the best of circumstances, have a happy birthday.

- Louisa


Happy birthday,

I wish you a happy birthday and hope you can be able to soon prove to the world that what you have done for this world is amazing and one day those who are against you now will understand your persistence for justice.

I am from Iraq and I can't but be very appreciative for the truth we already knew, but needed the world to know about.

Thank you and hope you have a nice day.

- Maha


Bob Dylan taught me a lot about freedom, and here's a song he wrote that teaches about life. My wish for you is to "stay forever young".

Best wishes,

- Janet in NH, USA

May God bless and keep you always
May your wishes all come true
May you always do for others
And let others do for you
May you build a ladder to the stars
And climb on every rung
May you stay forever young
Forever young forever young
May you stay forever young

May you grow up to be righteous
May you grow up to be true
May you always know the truth
And see the lights surrounding you
May you always be courageous
Stand upright and be strong
May you stay forever young
Forever young forever young
May you stay forever young

May your hands always be busy
May your feet always be swift
May you have a strong foundation
When the winds of changes shift
May your heart always be joyful
May your song always be sung
May you stay forever young
Forever young forever young
May you stay forever young


Happy Birthday Julian,

I hope that soon you can be in my beautiful country.

- Paola


Dear Julian,

You are a true hero who has inspired me and this entire generation in so many ways. We are no longer ignorant, thanks to brave people like you. You risked everything you ever had just to hand us the truth that we so rightfully deserve from our governments and we cannot thank you enough for it. No matter what happens, we will always continue to support you so please stay strong!

Happy birthday and may all your dreams come true. I pray for good health and a great year ahead for you. Thank you for changing the world, Julian.

Take care.

- Sara


Dear Julian,

Happy Birthday Julian Assange!

You should be able to spend it at home, not in an embassy asking for asylum! You have started a great action to bring awareness to all the world with WikiLeaks, and all the world can only thank you for this.

Changes can only start from awareness, and your efforts have made this possible.

Thank you Julian, I hope that this will be a happy birthday and that the many more to come will be only better.

- Enrica


Dear Julian,

It may be a bit strange to start my letter this way but I come from East Germany (born back in Soviet times) and I think that's the reason I grew up with people and family constantly telling me that being critical is not helpful and sometimes you should better not speak up, etc. Stupid advice, I know. Later at school I always got in trouble because I asked too many questions and always wanted to discuss stuff with the teachers instead of learning by heart what was set before us. I'm not sure if it's the same everywhere but I think a lot of us young people were raised that way and taught we shouldn't be active. That the world is bad, okay, but we can't change anything about this anyway, it's just too much trouble to fight for a better world, it doesn't "pay".

I think one reason why you are a hero to so many of us is that you taught us the exact opposite. And you are a person many of us would like to be like, but it turns out we were too afraid - or at least I was just. You have no idea how much hope you gave me, and I'm probably not the only person, and if I was able to, I actually would like to give you something back, but the only thing I have at the moment is all these stupid words here.

I read some of the other letters and yes it's true young people have strange wishes these days and I too wish I could be in London and stand in front of the embassy on your birthday. Crazy, eh? I wish I could bring you a cake or something, but above that, I wish I could tell you all this personally and give you a hug to say 'thank you'.

I wish you all the best for your next year and the strength to keep up the work you do - it is much appreciated. I hope that you will be granted asylum and I hope you have at least a bit of fun celebrating your birthday.

- Laura


Happy birthday to a complete human being.

Very few people fall in a category I call 'complete human beings'. People like Ernesto Guevara, Norman Finkelstein, Julian Assange, to name a few. These people have something in common: they are driven by pure love. Love is what drives the revolutionary, it compels him to act on injustice against enormous power, consciously endangering his own wellbeing. Power (having control over the mainstream forms of communication) distorts language, uses words like terrorist, national threat, etc to describe them, and that is key. When the people that have accumulated wealth and power through the exploitation of the masses target you as a threat.

To me that is the ultimate compliment a human being can receive.

Happy birthday To Julian Assange.

- Sergio


Dear Julian,

Such a privilege and an inspiration to have so closely followed this story since 2010.

Such a treat to have watched the functioning of your mind unfold.

Such distress to recognize the threats.

As an Aussie living in Europe for the last 12 years, following your story has not only reconnected me with Oz, but with the reality of our world which is only bearable through the filter of HOPE. I made the decision at the moment of 9/11 to turn off the MSM, having by accident heard the statement to the press from Bush and Blair, and I have never gone back. My overwhelming disgust at the hypocrisy at the time has only recently been calmed by the advent of WikiLeaks.

BRILLIANT. What an extraordinary concept and work you have brought to the world. Finding out that behind it was a barefoot boy from the Qld bush (and an AWESOME team) got me hooked even more. Then watching the elites of the Northern Hemisphere imploding and tripping over themselves as they came to realize not only who you were and where you were from, but how courageous, tenacious, and resolute you are and - goddam - how brilliant! They took a while to work that out, so comfortable are They in their Power.

I also feel that your spirit is quintessentially Australian and that is the first thing they didn't get. Hence the profuse filling in of their blank spaces by their Hacks, with suspicion, supposition, smear and slander stemming from hugely incorrect assumptions. All this can be observed from a distance, but what you really haven't deserved is the betrayal you've suffered, and this is where my heart has bled the most. And what a fucking waste that those people were so disappointing and felt so compromised or unable to keep up.

Some will regret their lack of courage and the damage they've done.

I believe you are also in the unique position of being the only man on the planet who has ever been wanted for questioning (SW) because he has been (is) pursued by SO many gorgeous young women. How they think they can credibly create the image of you as a predator is beyond me. The fact that you, a man with Integrity, Intelligence, and a Nurturing Mission is so attractive to women, leaves them in a very sorry place.

Whilst they need to 'buy' their women (women kept on low wages = vulnerability) through manifesting obscene wealth, power, and the associated 'right' to be predatory.

This is why so many women support you. We know what predators feel like and we know you are not a predator.

And as a mother (of a big boy) I just want to say that your Mum is adorable amazing formidable. If all mothers had half the intelligence, humanity, and backbone as Christine, the world would be in a better place. Her brave choice to be so public has given us all the opportunity to offer her our admiration and gratitude. I sincerely wish her joy and tranquility in the very near future.

You are quite a pair. In my thoughts every day, I take my hat off to you both and thank you profoundly for the huge sacrifices you have both made.

Julian, I keep my thoughts focused on an exciting future for you, with your freedom, your work, and your right to function fully in your unique brilliance!

STAY SAFE. STAY STRONG. YOU ARE NOT ALONE.

Probably a good thing you're not really available for your birthday - imagine how many people would turn up if they could!

With love and deep respect,

- Lynne xo


Hey J,

My best wishes are with you at this pivotal moment in your life, along with my deepest gratitude for what you and WikiLeaks have done for the cause of human freedom and wellbeing.

May you and WikiLeaks thrive and flourish.

- Gus


Dear Julian,

Happy Birthday to a truly remarkable man. Your work has enlightened many and dare I say 'changed the course of history'. Never forget that you have the backing and support of millions around the globe, including myself. You have championed the fight against censorship in an unprecedented way, while inspiring many to follow suit. You have instilled hope in the hearts and minds of a generation longing for change and for that, we will not turn a blind eye to your struggle. Thank you for your work, Julian.

Again, Happy Birthday Mr Assange and I sincerely wish you the best.

- Marlene Los Angeles


Julian, your shows on RT have been great, WL is a fantastic project, and you make many of the established media look like what they are: lipstick journalists grown fat on too many press trips, freebies, lunches, and bylines for crap and essentially meaningless articles.

You have made journalism important again and inspired a generation with the shocking reality of political criminality.

You have shone a spotlight on the world we live in. It is not a pretty place.

Thank you for your courage.

Stand firm. Don't let the bastard politicians get you down. And remember that while your false accusers have nothing to be proud of, many see you as a modern day hero.

Happy Birthday!

- Heather


Happy birthday Julian Assange: yours is a life that will never be silenced; in 41 years you have developed a moral integrity that has affected the world and its global historical narrative. The motivation, dedication, and courage that this has required is an inspiration.

The movement has started, it cannot be reversed. Thank you. And Christine: the ability of our parents to nurture is an important pillar in our abilities as adults to strive for greatness. Know that you are appreciated too.

- Teclo


Dear Julian,

I'd like to wish you a happy birthday on the third of July. I have always felt that what you and WikiLeaks have done is a great service to the world. It is only too predictable that established power would behave as it has towards you, Bradley Manning, and others.

I know there are countless other people of many backgrounds around the world who admire you and are so grateful to you and WikiLeaks for having the courage to speak out and challenge illegitimate authority. We are not subject to the pressures that you are of course, but I hope you will think of the support, esteem, and gratitude with which you are held by so many in so many places.

I have supported Bradley for some time and shall also support you: I am only too happy to be associated with you and what you have done in support of human dignity and worth.

I'll drink to you on the third. Happy birthday Julian!

Kind regards,

- John, Brussels


Happy birthday!

Keep the movement alive and going - we need you and we are rooting for you!

- George


Happy b'day, Julian!

I want you to know how much you are admired and appreciated by so very very many. Your courage and astute research work has done so much for the rest of us.

Wishing you truth and freedom forever!

Thank you!

- Lynda


You're smarter than they are. May you always stay at least one step ahead of the criminals.

Thank you.

- Kathlyn


Happy birthday dear Julian!

You are one brave man! Keep the good work!

It's horrible to see this endless US & UK media smear campaign against you! It just shows how corrupt most of the journalists and the politicians are (you haven't been charged and we hear all the time about your "charges" on the news) but don't worry - you are not alone! We support you! Be safe and be strong!

Best wishes from Brazil,

- Cristina


Hi Julian,

I just want to wish you great peace and happiness for your birthday. You are one of the great prophets of our age in the way you have created change for the better.

Thank you, thank you, thank you for your personal sacrifices and courage in the face of such powerful forces. I hope it helps give you strength and solace knowing that millions around the world are sending you love, light, gratitude, and prayer.

Much love,

- Jaqi


Julian,

Your courage and purity of conviction for the truth have given me a present on your birthday. You are our gift. May your heart and spirit soar on this day and always, knowing you and your work have made such a difference to this world. Thank you. Happy 41st! Please stay smart and live to a ripe old age!

With appreciation, admiration, and love,

- Trish


I'm proud to know that we share the same birthday, though I was 21 years old the day you were born. I wish you were God.

I also wish I had a 'get out of jail free' card that worked against insane governments. It would be yours.

Happy birthday!

- Beverly


Happy birthday!

Thanks for focusing us all on honesty and accuracy in journalism and in everything else. Know that whatever happens, your supporters are going to carry your ideals forward. They can't stop us; this is but the beginning of the beginning.

Best of luck and don't let the bastards get you down!

- Douglas


Dear Julian,

Happy birthday to you and thank you so much for fighting for all the world, for the planet.

With best wishes!

- Sylke from Germany


Happy birthday, Julian.

Thank you for opening our eyes and minds.

Wish you will be free soon. You have my wholehearted support.

- Susanne


Hi Julian Assange,

I'm sending you this little message to let you know I'm thinking of you.

I hope you don't feel too lonely today on your birthday. Keep on smiling! I love to see you smile! It gives me so much power - and makes me remember I have to fight, not to run. And I'll give it back in support of WikiLeaks and you. My heart is breaking to see what's going on. I wish you the best of luck!

Happy birthday!

- Diana, Germany


Happy birthday Julian,

And best wishes for your health and safety.

Look after yourself and keep strong and resolute. You are a bright and beautiful light in our sad and troubled world. Thank you for your work and your determination.

- Sandy, Brisbane Australia


Thank you Julian,

For all you have done and continue to do in the name of truth.

Though I do not know you personally, my thoughts are with you on your birthday, and like many 'ordinary' folks the world over, I will continue to do all in my power to support both you and the work you have begun.

Warmest blessings,

Polly, Salisbury UK


WL Central are currently collecting tweets (#JA41) and email greetings to Julian Assange to be published 2 July, the day before his birthday.

2012-07-03 #JA41 Tweets (Part 1)

Julian Assange celebrates his 41st birthday Tuesday 3 July 2012. The celebration may be at 3 Hans Crescent in Knightsbridge, or in a Swedish remand prison, or in the custody of the United States, or in Ecuador. But we want him to know, wherever he'll be, how much we all appreciate what he's done for us. Send your birthday greets to Julian at ja41@wlcentral.org - or with the Twitter tag #JA41.

WL Central are currently collecting tweets (#JA41) and email greetings to Julian Assange to be published 2 July, the day before his birthday.

2012-07-03 #JA41 Tweets (Part 2)

Julian Assange celebrates his 41st birthday Tuesday 3 July 2012. The celebration may be at 3 Hans Crescent in Knightsbridge, or in a Swedish remand prison, or in the custody of the United States, or in Ecuador. But we want him to know, wherever he'll be, how much we all appreciate what he's done for us. Send your birthday greets to Julian at ja41@wlcentral.org - or with the Twitter tag #JA41.

WL Central are currently collecting tweets (#JA41) and email greetings to Julian Assange to be published 2 July, the day before his birthday.

2012-07-03 #JA41 Tweets (Part 3)

Julian Assange celebrates his 41st birthday Tuesday 3 July 2012. The celebration may be at 3 Hans Crescent in Knightsbridge, or in a Swedish remand prison, or in the custody of the United States, or in Ecuador. But we want him to know, wherever he'll be, how much we all appreciate what he's done for us. Send your birthday greets to Julian at ja41@wlcentral.org - or with the Twitter tag #JA41.

WL Central are currently collecting tweets (#JA41) and email greetings to Julian Assange to be published 2 July, the day before his birthday.

2012-07-03 #JA41 Tweets (Part 4)

Julian Assange celebrates his 41st birthday Tuesday 3 July 2012. The celebration may be at 3 Hans Crescent in Knightsbridge, or in a Swedish remand prison, or in the custody of the United States, or in Ecuador. But we want him to know, wherever he'll be, how much we all appreciate what he's done for us. Send your birthday greets to Julian at ja41@wlcentral.org - or with the Twitter tag #JA41.

WL Central are currently collecting tweets (#JA41) and email greetings to Julian Assange to be published 2 July, the day before his birthday.

2012-07-03 #JA41 Tweets (Part 5)

Julian Assange celebrates his 41st birthday Tuesday 3 July 2012. The celebration may be at 3 Hans Crescent in Knightsbridge, or in a Swedish remand prison, or in the custody of the United States, or in Ecuador. But we want him to know, wherever he'll be, how much we all appreciate what he's done for us. Send your birthday greets to Julian at ja41@wlcentral.org - or with the Twitter tag #JA41.

WL Central are currently collecting tweets (#JA41) and email greetings to Julian Assange to be published 2 July, the day before his birthday.

2012-07-03 Great Aunt Sophie writes to her MP

Dear WikiLeakers:

I'm delighted that people are enjoying the Geek song and Great Aunt Sophie's midsummer spell.

My publicist Emma asked Aunt Sophie to share with you the letter she had written to her MP. Sophie was happy to oblige.

Emma wrote:

A blog I follow called for readers to write letters in support of Julian to their Members of Parliament. But I no longer live in England.

I could send an email detailing the prosecution's violations of the European Arrest Warrant procedure. I doubt anyone would notice it wasn't a UK address - do they even read these things?

I like to send paper copies, imagining piles of pro-Julian letters overflowing the desk of the assistant to the assistant to the officious official. But the stamps would be a dead giveaway.

Then I remembered my great aunt Sophie, who lives in West Yorkshire. She used to be quite a rabble-rouser; in her university days she was known as the Mother Jones of north Suffolk, or was it south Norfolk? I asked if she would write a letter in defence of Julian to her MP.

This morning I received a copy of her letter.

Crone Cottage
Wormhill, near Ducksbury
Ilkley Moor, W. Yorks.
HX5 9DF

To: Mrs. Linda Riordan, MP, Halifax

CC: Ms. Theresa May, Home Secretary
Mr. Nick Clegg, Deputy Home Secretary
Mr. David Cameron, PM
Mr. Thomas Hammarberg, Commissioner for Human Rights, Council of Europe

Dear High Muckety-Mucks:

I am an eighty-five-year-old Englishwoman living in a cottage outside Posslethwaite, miles from human habitation. My nearest neighbours are the farmers across the way, whom I watch every day herding their cows and repairing their dry stone walls. The closest pubs are The Inseminator's Elbow in Farmington, twenty kilometres, and The Cracked Code in Hackerdale, thirty-five kilometres - neither, it goes without saying, an establishment suitable for a lady.

Life would be bleak indeed were it not for my Internet connection. I used to spend hours numbing out with Monty Python re-runs, Sex In The City, and The Tudors. To keep my mind sharp I watched those TED talks. Then I saw one filmed in Oxford, an interview with a nice young man with white hair.

Three minutes into the young man's talk, his mobile phone goes off. "Goddamn it", he says, giggling, all legs and elbows as he reaches into his pocket to retrieve the fiendish thingie. The host ad libs, "It must be the CIA calling to ask about the code for a TED membership".

I was charmed.

I was not the only one.

This woman AA, for instance - right piece of work. Calls herself a lesbian, runs a lesbian nightclub called Fever. She invites the nice young man to give a talk, tells him she'll be gone, he can stay at her flat. Comes back a day early and offers to take him to dinner. Afterwards he can share her bed, or sleep on a mattress on the floor. Not the most difficult choice he's ever had to make.

But at some point they get into The Tussle Over The Condom. We've all been there. Most of the time you give in, because it's a turn-off to fight before you f - make love. It's also a turn-off to worry about getting pregnant or catching a disease, so you feel bad afterwards.

But that's a far cry from "rape". I read that neither the lesbian nor the cashmere sweater girl used that word. The police used it, and leaked the story to the tabloids. They wanted to stick it to the nice young man because he said they weren't holding governments and corporations accountable. They fought back by outing him - and the women. Once one paper cried rape, all the others took it up, without examining the evidence. Proving his point that they had no interest in "scientific journalism".

I showed Gertie a video of the nice young man accepting an award at the Oslo Freedom Forum. He wore jeans and a white shirt and carried a small laptop. He was so tall he had to bend over the microphone, shifting from leg to leg. His hair flashed silver against the blue backdrop.

An old man came up to him afterwards. "You are the only one which is sounding like a pure angel."

"A pure angel? Me? No, it's just the hair."

Gertie laughed and laughed. "That man never had to rape anyone", she said. "That man is fighting them off with a stick."

~*~*~*~

If you are determined to put someone in prison, how about that vacuous Yank hacker who turned in the gay bloke? Says he's a minister, rats on the kid, hands him over to the Feds to be tortured, then claims it's all the fault of the nice young man.

Who's paying him, I wonder. They should put him in a cell with the Swedish lesbian. He'd be a puddle on the floor in three days. Judas.

In closing, I beseech you to listen to your conscience. You are going to have to live with this decision for the rest of your lives. US government officials say the nice man has "blood on his hands" - talk about pots and kettles! I pray you don't end up with blood on yours.

I remain your most humble and obedient servant,

Sophie Goldstein, MSW, RN (ret.), DSFA

--
The Flower of Australia: Three Songs for Julian and his Friends
is scheduled for release on July 3rd, 2012
Julian's (In Prison) - The Geek Shall Inherit The Earth - The Flower of Australia
All proceeds go towards the defense of Julian Assange

$5-10 sliding scale
Signed and numbered pre-release copies $20
Mail checks to
Holly Tannen
POB 1136
Mendocino, CA 95460

2012-07-03 Thank you to all

A few words at the end to all those who've helped.

This started a few weeks ago when one of the WLC reporters suggested doing something for Julian's birthday. The idea took off by itself.

We had many more ambitions but this is what we got.

We'd like to thank all those who contributed both via mail and with #JA41.

Now a word about inspiration.

We didn't know what to expect but your letters and tweets moved us. We really liked what we saw. It wasn't work to put this all together - it was a labour of love.

We're all very tired now. We've all worked overtime. And now we shall sink into dreamland and hope there's good food on the table in Knightsbridge this evening.

Thank you to all.

- The WLC Team

2012-07-06 Australia's opposition has also abandoned Julian Assange

After seeking asylum in Ecuador's London embassy, WikiLeaks' Editor-in-Chief Julian Assange asserted that Prime Minister Julia Gillard's Labor Party government in his native Australia had made an "effective declaration of abandonment" by refusing to intervene in any extradition to Sweden or the USA. Now the Leader of the Opposition, Tony Abbott, has confirmed that Mr Assange can expect no better from Australia's Coalition parties.

Mr Abbott made the following comments during a recent JJJ radio interview:

Q: I want to move on to another issue, Mr Abbott, about the WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange. Your Foreign Affairs spokesperson Julie Bishop has been very critical of the government's handling of his case. She said, you know, in comparison the PM has called on a 14 year old in jail in Bali - personally called him - and Bob Carr flew to Libya to visit Melinda Taylor when she was incarcerated there. Do you think the government is doing enough to help Julian Assange?

Tony Abbott: "Look, I think the government should do as much for him as it does for anyone else in trouble."

Q: Julia Bishop was highly critical about the Prime Minister's comments. She has said in 2010 that Julian Assange had "engaged in an illegal act". Do you think that that was appropriate, for Prime Minister Gillard to say that?

Tony Abbott: "Certainly she seemed to be very quick to judge the guy. And normally Prime Ministers don't set themselves up as the judge, jury and if necessary executioner. He's entitled to the presumption of innocence, just like other people who are accused of offences overseas, and he's entitled to the ordinary representation that the Australian government gives."

Q: Would you have said that he'd engaged in illegal acts?

Tony Abbott: "Look, I don't claim to be the world's greatest expert on Julian Assange and I'm not very sympathetic to people who publish things that might endanger national security. Even people who I don't particularly like or admire are entitled to their day in court and the presumption of innocence and - "

Q: Do you think he really has endangered national security though, Mr Abbott?

Tony Abbott: "Well... Many people think he has. I haven't made it my close preoccupation."

Q: But do YOU think he has?

Tony Abbott: "Well, it's not a very good thing for Australia, or for our alliances, or for our allies, for their military secrets to be published."

Q: Last question, Mr Abbott. If the US did try to extradite Assange, do you think the government should intervene?

Tony Abbott: "Well I think we should allow the same processes to operate in respect of him as operate in respect of others. Now my understanding is that we have an extradition treaty with the United States. The British and the Swedish would have extradition treaties with the United States, and the ordinary law of the land, or of those lands, should operate."

Q: But people class this as - His supporters say he's being you know, accused of committing political crimes -

Tony Abbott: "Mmmm..."

Q: - and that you shouldn't support the extradition of someone for that, for perceived political crimes. So even if the treaties allow for criminals to be extradited between the UK and America, or Sweden and America, or Australia and America for that matter, should it be for something like this?

Tony Abbott: "Well I don't see the distinction between one crime and another crime. I mean a crime is a crime is a crime. And -

Q: But this, is it a crime? Releasing documents that many would say the public has a right to know?

Tony Abbott: "If the appropriate prosecuting authorities think that he might have committed a crime and they think that there's a prima facie case, let them bring the case and let the courts decide."

Q: Even if he faced a life in prison for releasing those documents?

Tony Abbott: "Well if you commit a crime in Indonesia, you are judged in accordance with Indonesian standards. If you break American law in another country, it depends upon the extradition arrangements between America and that other country, and it should be dealt with in the ordinary courts in the ordinary way."

Download MP3

Responding to Mr Abbott's comments on the same radio program, Julian Assange's mother Christine said she was "gob-smacked".

"The man is ignorant," said Mrs Assange. "Absolutely ignorant. We're talking about a journalist. This is not a crime. This is a recognised media organisation who has worked in co-operation with other media outlets. Nobody except the US is alleging there's a crime here, and they can't even produce evidence of a crime."

"My grave concern, my great fear, and the fear of everybody who knows this case well, is that Julian will be extradited because his government won't stand up for him, and that unless he is given political asylum, he will be extradited, tortured and killed."

Barrister Julian Burnside, who has been visiting Julian Assange in the Ecuadorean embassy, also rejected Mr Abbott's claims.

"In the two years since the cables were released, and re-published by the press around the world, I've not heard any plausible report that the national security of any country has been impacted by that release. But in addition to that, if Mr Abbott is concerned about threats to national security, he should reflect on the fact that he was part of the government that took Australia into an illegal war in Iraq. And I would have thought that had much greater impact on our national security than anything WikiLeaks has done."

Mr Burnside dismissed Mr Abbott's caution about interfering with extradition processes in other countries.

"I think it misses a main point. The concern about Assange being sent to Sweden is that Sweden and America have got a witness lending program, by which a prisoner can be transferred informally between those two jurisdictions, bypassing the formal extradition processes. What Assange is particularly concerned about is that if ever he gets into the custody of the Swedes, the Americans will ask them to lend him to America, and once he gets into America of course he is likely to suffer the same sort of fate that Bradley Manning has suffered."

"Now Manning, who is alleged to have originally obtained the documents that were published on WikiLeaks, has been held in dreadful conditions for two years by the Americans. He's been held naked in his cell, ostensibly for his own protection, and during that time apparently they have tried to get him to implicate Assange in the original obtaining of the documents. Assange has not been implicated in that."

"And so far as saying that it's a criminal offence for WikiLeaks to have published those documents, the fact is that the mainstream press around the world published the same documents. And there's no suggestion that the proprietors of the mainstream press around the world have committed any offence."

Christine Assange claims both major Australian political parties are ignoring the facts.

"This is the problem that I've got with this commentary all along, is that neither Gillard, Abbott, or the appointed henchmen Carr and Roxon are telling the people the facts. And there's fact after fact after fact that indicates that this is nothing more than a political persecution to silence the truth. And what does the Australian government do - all except the Greens - is aid and abet that political persecution."

Mrs Assange also revealed the cost this prolonged lack of Australian government support is taking on her personally.

"I live with terror," she said. "Absolute terror. Nightmares all night."

"I've had to rise to the occasion. I am not a public person, I'm actually quite a shy person, personally, so this has been very difficult for me, to do this. And I wish he'd never done it, as a mother, to be frank.

"But as a citizen, I am so proud of him. I am so proud of WikiLeaks, and that courageous little team of half a dozen people."

2012-07-06 WikiLeaks News Update: WikiLeaks releases the Syria Files; "The World Tomorrow" airs final episode




WikiLeaks has been financially blockaded without process for 580 days.
Julian Assange has been detained without charge for 577 days.
Bradley Manning has been imprisoned without trial for 774 days.
A secret Grand Jury has been active in the U.S. without transparency for 660 days.


WikiLeaks News:

Syria Files (image via WikiLeaks)

  • WikiLeaks held a press conference at the Frontline Club in London to announce the release of the Syria Files, over 2 million emails from Syrian political figures, ministries and associated companies, dating from August 2006 to March 2012. WikiLeaks is currently collaborating with Al Akhbar, Al Masry Al Youm, ARD, L’Espresso, Owni and Publico.es for this release.
    • The first major revelation to come out from the emails is that Italian firm SELEX (subsidiary of Finmeccanica) was selling the Syrian government secure TETRA radios as the uprising was raging. SELEX had to work around U.S. bans on technology shipments to Syria in order to transport the radios.
    • RT interviewed Jesselyn Radack of the Government Accountability Project and Vaughan Smith of the Frontline Club about the release.
    • Democracy Now! interviewed Salon journalist Glenn Greenwald about the release, as well as Julian Assange's bid for political asylum.
    • Firedoglake's Kevin Gosztola wrote a good summary of the Syria Files releases so far.
    • A torrent of the current releases is available.

Kristinn Hrafnsson and Jennifer Robinson at Almedalen. (photo via Expressen)

  • WikiLeaks spokesman Kristinn Hrafnsson and lawyer Jennifer Robinson held a press conference at Almedalen in Sweden shortly before the Syria Files were announced. They discussed the current status of the banking blockade and the grand jury. Mr Hrafnsson said the judgment from their legal case against the blockade in Iceland is expected in 2-3 weeks, while a new case in Danish courts will start this fall. On the grand jury he commented that, out of 45,000 documents they have, only 1/5 relate to Bradley Manning, with the rest targeting WikiLeaks associates.
  • A WikiLeaks cable shows that the U.S. Ambassador to China stated that "Chinese rhetorical strutting" should not be taken too seriously, as their "actions speak louder than words".
  • According to a WikiLeaks cable, Defence Minister Emerson Mnangagwa is not on the list of Zimbabwe President Robert Mugabe’s possible successors because of his ethnicity.
  • Friends of WikiLeaks' first friendship network assignment is completed. Log in now to see your friends!
  • EFF's Trevor Timm was on The Alyona Show discussing how the ongoing WikiLeaks Grand Jury threatens the press freedom of all journalists. Watch the interview below:
  • Icelandic MP and former WikiLeaks volunteer Birgitta Jónsdóttir wrote an op-ed for The Guardian discussing how she is warned not to visit the U.S. and how the Department of Justice tried to hack her social media accounts. She also stated, "Assange has every reason to worry about being extradited to the US".
  • Bernard Keane wrote about the continued harassment of WikiLeaks and Julian Assange associates, including Jacob Appelbaum, Birgitta Jónsdóttir, Jêrêmie Zimmermann, Smari McCarthy, Jen Robinson, and Laura Poitras.
  • Nathan Fuller of the Bradley Manning Support Network took a look back on how WikiLeaks has aided the public, as Julian Assange turns 41 and Bradley Manning nears his 800th day in jail without trial.
  • Dan Mathew's published full text of the speech he gave during the July 1st Melbourne rally, "WikiLeaks and History".


Julian Assange News:

Ecuadorian Foreign Minister Robert Patino.

  • Australian Foreign Minister Bob Carr secured the release of lawyer Melinda Taylor. The Australian Greens applauded this effort and asked that the same vigour be shown in defending Julian Assange, as well as journalist Austin Mackell.
  • Ecuadorian Foreign Minister Ricardo Patino said that the decision on Julian Assange's request for asylum will be explained in "tens or hundreds" of pages and that Ecuador would never extradite someone for the purpose of questioning, as Sweden has been attempting to do with Mr Assange. He further described the sexual misconduct allegations against Julian Assange as "hilarious", specifically referring to the allegation that he broke a condom on purpose. He also said that "it's a bit naive" to think the main reason Sweden wants to extradite Mr Assange is the sex allegations.

World Tomorrow banner

  • The 12th and final episode of The World Tomorrow aired, featuring Malaysian politician Anwar Ibrahim. The full episode as well as the raw 1.5 hour transcript is available online.
  • With the final episode of The World Tomorrow having aired Tuesday, RT took a look back at the twelve-episode series. The entire series plus full, unedited transcripts is available to watch online. Watch RT's segment below:
  • Author Tracy Quan wrote an article entitled "I Love the Julian Assange Show!" in which she described her favourite aspects of The World Tomorrow and her hopes for a second season. She was also interviewed on Hong Kong Radio 3.


Bradley Manning News:

  • The U.S. Army has blocked access to information about the Bradley Manning Support Network due to an active investigation. The Support Network does not believe this refers to an investigation into their organisation, rather in reference to Bradley Manning's legal proceedings.

Fort Manning. (Image via Bradley Manning Support Network)

  • Supporters of Bradley Manning are launching "Fort Manning", an occupation of the Federal Court House in Los Angeles from July 13-16.
  • The Bradley Manning Support Network offers information on how to support Bradley during his July 16-20 hearings.
  • With his trial date delayed, Bradley Manning's defence costs have grown. WISE UP for Bradley Manning is asking that people donate to his defence fund to help cover these additions costs.
  • Chase Madar, author of "The Passion of Bradley Manning", and Kevin Gosztola, co-author of "Truth and Consequences: The U.S. vs. Bradley Manning", discussed Bradley Manning, his court martial, and WikiLeaks on a panel which aired on BookTV.



............................................

Upcoming Dates & Events:

July 6: Kristinn Hrafnsson and Jennifer Robinson to speak at Almedalen, 8PM.

July 7: Queer Friends of Bradley Manning will be marching at World Pride in London.

July 13 - 16: "Fort Manning" occupation of L.A. Federal Court House.

July 14: Global for Julian Assange Day.

July 15: Rally for Julian Assange, Town Hall, Sydney, 1PM.

July 16 - 20: Bradley Manning pre-trial hearings.

August 27 - 31: Bradley Manning pre-trial hearings.

September 19 - 20: Bradley Manning pre-trial hearings.

November 2012 ~ January 2013: Estimated time frame for Bradley Manning's court martial.

2012-07-07 Sweden's 'reinterpretation' of MLA law

UPDATE BELOW: 2012-07-31

Mutual Legal Assistance (MLA) is a common legal practice in the European Union. It is an agreement between two countries to help cooperation during investigation of alleged crimes. The EU's website states "mutual legal assistance and agreements on extradition are essential for the EU in order to achieve a European area of justice".

The Swedish prosecution has requested Julian Assange's extradition for the purpose of questioning on allegations of sexual misconduct. He is yet to be formally charged with an offense.

Since his arrest, Mr Assange has offered himself to be questioned under the MLA practices, by telephone, video conference, or in person. He continues to retain this offer, even during his current stay at the Ecuadorian Embassy as he awaits a decision on his application for asylum. The Ecuadorians have agreed to letting the Swedish prosecution come to the Embassy to question him.

WikiLeaks' legal adviser Jennifer Robinson met with Sweden's Minister for Foreign Affairs Carl Bildt on July 5 during Almedalen Week, a political conference in Gotland. She discussed with him the allegations against Julian Assange and why Sweden has refused to question him over the past 18 months.

He told me it's not allowed. And when I pointed out that Sweden had only recently done just that in a murder investigation in Serbia, he had no reply.

Swedish prosecutor Marianne Ny made similar statements in 2010, saying that Swedish Law prevents Mr Assange being interviewed by telephone or video link, and that both Swedish and British law prevent her from traveling to London to question Mr Assange. Many of the articles containing the latter statement were later removed.

Since Julian Assange has not been formally charged, he does not have the rights of a defendant, i.e. access to the full accusations against him or any of the evidence. Could the fact that he only faces allegations affect the use of MLA law?

The guidelines for getting Mutual Legal Assistance from the UK state the contrary.

In the section entitled "What must be included in a Letter of Request" it states:

A description of the offences charged or under investigation and sentence or penalty

Furthermore, in an "Example Letter of Request" it states:

Supply information on the charge or proposed charge.

A full page of the document is also dedicated to the information needed to request a telephone or video conference call, which includes an address, a possible list of questions, and any formal notification of rights.

Neither Carl Bildt nor Marianne Ny would explain how or why it is illegal under Swedish law to question Mr Assange via telephone, video conference, or in person. With no explanation on their behalf, the EU promoting the use of Mutual Legal Assistance, and a document explaining how to achieve information this way, it opens the door for speculation as to why Sweden refuses to question Mr Assange.

UPDATE: 2012-07-31

A few days ago, Ecuador's Ambassador to Sweden formally offered Swedish prosecutors the opportunity to question Julian Assange while he is held at the Ecuadorian Embassy in London. Sweden once again rejected the offer, failing to provide any "meaningful explanation", according to WikiLeaks.

RT's Laura Smith commented on the refusal:

This doesn't really come as a particular surprise. Ever since this case began, almost two years ago now, Julian Assange has been offering to the Swedish Authorities to come to London and question him here, and they've never done that. [...] Maybe what Assange and his legal team and indeed the Ecuadorian diplomats felt could be different this time is that the invitation isn't coming from just Assange himself, it's coming from another state. So he's got another state operating on his behalf, so it's almost like it's on equal terms.

But possibly the reason they have rejected the request is that the Swedish authorities have really backed themselves into a corner. It's been that long now that they've been saying, 'No, we want you to come to Sweden', that they can't now back down and say, 'Okay, we'll come to London after all and interview you'. But also, it really begs the question, does the Swedish prosecutor really want to get to the bottom of this case? It certainly looks as if she doesn't, and if not then, of course, why not?

2012-07-08 WikiLeaks News Update: Syria Files coverage; Updates in Assange asylum bid




WikiLeaks has been financially blockaded without process for 582 days.
Julian Assange has been detained without charge for 579 days.
Bradley Manning has been imprisoned without trial for 776 days.
A secret Grand Jury has been active in the U.S. without transparency for 662 days.


WikiLeaks News:

Syria Files (image via WikiLeaks)

  • More Syria Files were released, bringing the current total to 50. Here is the latest coverage:
    • A key aide of Bashar al-Assad is soon to receive her PhD from Durham University in England. The University refused to comment whether they received money from the Assad regime.
    • Brown Lloyd James, a lobbying firm which worked on a Vogue story about Bashar al-Assad's wife, continued working to improve the Syrian regime's image as the country descended into violence. RT reported on the failure to improve their image.
    • House of Lords member Lord Kenilworth was hired and payed thousands of pounds to redesign the summer palace of Assad.
    • WikiLeaks spokesman Kristinn Hrafnsson commented during a debate that, while the Syria Files is a staggered release, it will "escalate exponentially" in the coming days.
    • #SyriaFiles was the top trend on Twitter after the announcement yesterday, with 17,000 tweets containing the hashtag sent out within 10 hours.
    • An article at Techdirt asked, "With WikiLeaks releasing Syrian emails, will people realize it's not targeting the U.S.?"
  • 'WikiLeaks' and 'Julian Assange' were the top searches on Wikipedia from 2010-2012.
  • Icelandic MP Birgitta Jonsdottir was interviewed by PRNRadio about the U.S. vendetta against WikiLeaks.
  • NYT eXaminer wrote about The New York Times' failure to issue corrections when it comes to Julian Assange and WikiLeaks. They also sent out a list of NYT's failures when reporting on WikiLeaks via Twitter. Below are a few examples:
  • A debate entitled "Can Media Change the World?" was held at Almedalen in Sweden, where WikiLeaks' Kristinn Hrafnsson and Jennifer Robinson took part. Video of the debate is available.


Julian Assange News:

  • Julian Assange remains at the Ecuadorian Embassy awaiting decision on his asylum application. Here are some of the latest updates:
    • Foro de São Paulo, a political conference of organisations from Latin America and the Caribbean, called on Ecuador to accept Mr Assange's asylum application.
    • As Mr Assange nears three weeks at the Ecuadorian Embassy, London supporters continue to hold daily vigils.
    • Mr Assange would likely have been in Sweden prison by this date, still without being charged, had he not chosen to seek political asylum.
    • An article at Anti-War.com discussed Julian Assange's "last stand" in applying for political asylum and that, while the author lacks hope for Mr Assange's future freedom, he will go down in history as a hero.
  • An op-ed in Belfast Telegraph discusses how Julian Assange's work with WikiLeaks has been a service to everyone, and why the people must stand up for him.
  • A man wrote about the many occasions he is mistaken for Julian Assange.


Bradley Manning News:

  • Supporters of Bradley Manning took to the streets across the U.S. to participate in "Free Bradley Manning" contingents in pride parades.
  • The Bradley Manning Support Network issued a news update for July 6 which covers World Pride Day, a Bradley Manning panel discussion, and "The Passion of Bradley Manning" audiobook.



............................................

Upcoming Dates & Events:

July 13 - 16: "Fort Manning" occupation of L.A. Federal Court House.

July 14: Global for Julian Assange Day.

July 15: Rally for Julian Assange, Town Hall, Sydney, 1PM.

July 16 - 20: Bradley Manning pre-trial hearings.

August 27 - 31: Bradley Manning pre-trial hearings.

September 19 - 20: Bradley Manning pre-trial hearings.

November 2012 ~ January 2013: Estimated time frame for Bradley Manning's court martial.

2012-07-10 Fear of U.S. backlash further justifies Assange's concerns

Julian Assange arrived at the Ecuadorian Embassy in London on June 19 in order to seek political asylum. His application is based on concern of U.S. extradition and prosecution.

Since the announcement of his decision to seek asylum, there has been discussion of possible U.S. rebuttal if Ecuador were to accept Mr Assange into asylum.

The editorial board of The Washington Post published an opinion piece on June 20, the day after Mr Assange arrived at the Embassy. In the article they suggested possible economic ways the U.S. may harm Ecuador:

There is one potential check on Mr. Correa’s ambitions. The U.S. “empire” he professes to despise happens to grant Ecuador (which uses the dollar as its currency) special trade preferences that allow it to export many goods duty-free. A full third of Ecuadoran foreign sales ($10 billion in 2011) go to the United States, supporting some 400,000 jobs in a country of 14 million people. Those preferences come up for renewal by Congress early next year. If Mr. Correa seeks to appoint himself America’s chief Latin American enemy and Julian Assange’s protector between now and then, it’s not hard to imagine the outcome.

A few days later, Otto Reich—former senior official in the administrations of Presidents Ronald Reagan, George Bush Sr, and George Bush Jr—advocated for the U.S. to act against Ecuador. He labels Mr Assange as a "accused sex-criminal" and falsely states he faces "serious charges", despite him only facing allegations. He also attacks Ecuadorian President Rafael Correa, stating "Americans may not know just how much damage Correa has done to U.S.-Ecuadorian relations and democracy in his country".

In a recent radio interview, the Ecuadorian Ambassador to the U.S., Nathalie Cely, also brought up the idea of potential U.S. backlash against Ecuador, should they grant Mr Assange's request for asylum:

Giving asylum to Assange would be used as ammunition to attack the country.

She further stated that pressure groups had already launched salvos in order to "disparage her country in the eyes of U.S. business leaders and policymakers" and that recriminations against Ecuador for sheltering Assange "already have begun".

While threats of U.S. backlash may attempt to dissuade Ecuador in granting Mr Assange's asylum, it should actually have the opposite affect. If the U.S. is so completely against the idea of Mr Assange receiving asylum that they would economically or otherwise harm a country which accepts him, this further justifies Mr Assange's fears of U.S. prosecution.

Since September of 2010, a secret Grand Jury has been investigating WikiLeaks. Recently, it was revealed that the Grand Jury is targeting seven civillians who are "founders, owners, or managers of WikiLeaks". The FBI file into WikiLeaks now contains 48,135 pages, with one fifth of them relating to alleged WikiLeaks source Pfc. Bradley Manning.

The U.S. Justice Department recently confirmed that their investigation into WikiLeaks is ongoing. Soon after, Chairman of the Senate Select Committee on Intelligence, Californian Democratic Senator Dianne Feinstein, renewed the call for prosecution of Julian Assange:

I believe Mr Assange has knowingly obtained and disseminated classified information which could cause injury to the United States. He has caused serious harm to US national security, and he should be prosecuted accordingly.

Julian Assange has also been labeled a terrorist by the current U.S. Vice President, and also has faced multiple calls for his assassination from U.S. political figures.

It is evident that the U.S. poses a great threat to Julian Assange. Despite all this, some journalists and critics are still perpetuating the skepticism of serious danger.

The Ecuadorian Ambassador to the U.S. stated that her country is "ready as ever to defend our position and our decisions". Hopefully this means standing up to the bully nation the United States has become and accepting Mr Assange into political asylum.

2012-07-10 Julia Gillard comes clean on WikiLeaks

I bumped into Australian Prime Minister Julia Gillard on the train yesterday. I mean, literally bumped. I was lurching towards the last available seat on the 4:45 pm from Central when I tripped and collapsed over the armrest beside her, momentarily dislodging the blonde wig she was wearing as a disguise. The glossy red hair was a giveaway, and there was no hiding that nose.

"Why, you're Julia Gill-" I began. But she cut me off.

"Sshh! National Security!" she hissed.

I settled into my chair, pulled out a book and pretended to read it.

"Why are you on this train?" I whispered. "Where's your security?"

"Haven't you seen my polls?" she replied. "I'm desperate. I thought I'd better slip away and get among the people for a while."

Fair point, I thought. So assuming she really did want to know what people were thinking, I asked her why the government hadn't done more to help Julian Assange.

"It's not as simple as you might think," she groaned. "If I said anything nice about WikiLeaks, the Americans would get rid of me as quickly as they got rid of Kevin."

"But you don't even like WikiLeaks," I protested. "You said so yourself."

"Hah! Just because I said something live on national television doesn't mean I believe it."

"So you DO support WikiLeaks?" I asked in surprise.

"Of course not. But the fact that I've said that doesn't mean you should believe it either. I am a politician, you know."

I stared at my book - "A Fortunate Life" by A.B. Facey - and noticed it was upside down. This was turning into a rather strange trip. Ms Gillard seemed to notice my discomfort.

"Australians always forget what a small and insignificant nation we really are," she explained. "As a Prime Minister, I can only do my best within the existing realities. Politics is the art of the possible, as they say."

"But surely you can speak up?" I insisted. "Surely you can go on TV and - "

"Did you see what they did to Gough? Latham? Harold Holt? David Hicks?"

"So you're saying Australia is a US Client State, and has been for years?"

"No, you're saying that. I'm saying the new US Marine Base in Darwin is a great boost to regional security. And next month I'll say that a new US nuclear submarine base in Brisbane will further enhance stability across the Pacific."

"But why would you say that, if you don't believe it?"

"That's my job!" she laughed. "It doesn't matter if I believe it or not."

I began to see where she was coming from. This is the morally empty, post-post-Modern world we live in today, an ethical vacuum where careers are pursued solely for fame and fortune. And Julia Gillard is the ultimate realpolitik party apparatchik.

"So what would it take for you to speak out in support of Julian Assange?" I asked. "I mean, some eighty percent of Australians support WikiLeaks, and this is supposed to be a democracy, so surely it's in your own electoral interests to speak up for him. Besides, he's done nothing wrong!"

"True," she nodded. "But Labor would rather lose the next election than upset Washington. Same goes for the Opposition. You see, the problem with WikiLeaks is that it has no real power base. If George Soros were to get behind them, for example, then things might be different."

"So if WikiLeaks had billions of dollars, you would speak up for Assange?"

"No," she confessed. "But Tony Abbott might."

"Well then, I'd vote for him," I said.

That got her attention. She paused and looked me directly in the eye.

"No you wouldn't," she said slowly. "Because you know Tony Abbott is a liar."

She was right. If the Australian Liberal Party ever promised to help Assange return home, I'd assume it was part of a plot to help the CIA assassinate him.

"You'll vote Greens," Ms Gillard continued. "Just like you have at the past four elections."

"Wait a minute! How did you -?"

Gillard put a finger to her lips and motioned with her eyes towards a security camera in the roof of the train. Then she tapped her ear and I noticed a tiny wireless microphone.

"I'm never really alone," she sighed. "But then, neither are you. This is the price we must pay for security.

"It doesn't have to be this way, Julia. You're building a surveillance state. This is madness!"

"Maybe. But that's how it is. The art of the possible, remember? Goodbye now."

The train pulled into a station. As she disembarked, two burly men moved to either side of her.

"Hey!" I cried. "You said you'd slipped away from your bodyguards!"

She gave me a withering smile as she carefully adjusted her wig.

"I'm a politician," she reminded me.

I went home wondering if this had just been a random encounter, or if the Prime Minister had deliberately targeted me for this conversation. My head was swimming. I knew ASIO were monitoring WikiLeaks supporters, but surely the PM wasn't personally involved?

Then I switched on the TV and heard an unmistakeable nasal twang. Julia Gillard was being interviewed live from another state. So whom did I just speak to on the train? Maybe it was all just a bad dream?

I'd certainly like to think so...

2012-07-15 Après Assange, Le Déluge

King Louis XV is widely credited with the phrase “Après moi, le déluge” (after me, the deluge), although it may have been spoken by Madame de Pompadour, his official mistress (the title was by appointment at the time: she divorced her husband after assuming the position). In any case, it was prophetic: Louis XV was the last monarch before the French Revolution. Louis XVI, his grandson and successor, was guillotined in 1793 at the Place de la Révolution.

On this Bastille Day, as the 21st Century staggers from one crisis to another, we are presented with a new turning point, inherently rich with the same revolutionary opportunity. Modern dictators and repressive regimes have long sought total control of the Internet, and with it the means to control information. But now even Western Governments, corrupted by Big Business and lacking true democratic legitimacy, are attempting to lock down information and dictate our very histories.

Let us be clear. The teflon-coated banksters who brought us this never-ending Global Financial Crisis, and the puppet governments who brought us the Iraq War, have bloody secrets they wish to keep hidden. Their psychopathic lack of morality is already clear. Millions of innocent people have already been killed, maimed, displaced and tortured for their greed. The mainstream media are in their pockets. They have thrown international law, the US Constitution, and national sovereignty out the window. These people will not go quietly - they have far too much to lose.

Sleeping on a blow-up mattress in an office of the Ecuadorian Embassy in London, Julian Assange is at the very center of this growing storm. And his fate may well determine the course of humankind.

Will WikiLeaks be followed by a deluge of free information, transforming our understanding of history and ushering in a new era of open government? Will Assange's battle for transparency open the floodgates to a radical transformation of society, whereby the gatekeepers of information are forced to publicly rationalise their decision-making with confirmed empirical evidence? Will this be the end of politically-motivated pseudo-science and socially destructive political spin?

Or will WikiLeaks be the last hurrah for free speech, followed by a deluge of new laws and restrictions that kill Internet freedom once and for all? Will the Internet go the way of the atomic bomb and become the most effective tool of power ever invented? Will endless resource wars continue to be justified by bullshit PR exercises while our planet warms beyond the point of no return? Is this the way the world ends?

Are we, the citizens of this earth - right now - choosing between certain Armageddon and a comparative Utopia? And if so, why are so few of us even aware what's going on?

Of course this is not just about Julian Assange, or even WikiLeaks. There are thousands of wonderfully gifted and inspiring people around the globe, courageously fighting the same battle for truth, transparency and online freedom.

But I cannot help thinking that Assange is now the canary in the coalmine.

At this critical time, I urge everyone who understands the stakes at play to put aside petty squabbles, put aside fragile egos, and unite in support for Julian Assange. Whatever you may think of his mainstream-media-enhanced personality, this is a man who has dedicated his life to truth, transparency, peace and love. If his sacrifices ultimately prove to be in vain, then all our efforts may also prove inconsequential.

The future is ours. Together we are strong. Vive la Révolution!

2012-07-17 Condi and Hillary's "Tug of War" with Chávez in Paraguay

By Nikolas Kozloff.

For isolated and impoverished countries, it can sometimes prove difficult to pursue an independent foreign policy which challenges Washington's traditional sphere of influence. Take, for example, tiny Paraguay which has recently been convulsed in political instability. Four years ago, Fernando Lugo was elected president after pledging to take on political and economic elites on behalf of Paraguay's poor. A former Bishop, Lugo promised to tackle pressing social problems like land reform. On the international front too, Lugo was controversial: though he continued to maintain friendly ties to the U.S., he also made overtures toward the populist regime of Hugo Chávez of Venezuela.

Not surprisingly, such policies did not go over well either in Paraguay or Washington. As I explained in another recent column, Lugo was recently impeached under very questionable circumstances, and indeed some have labeled the Bishop President's removal a kind of "quasi-coup." Following a skewed vote in the opposition-controlled Congress, Lugo was impeached for allegedly encouraging land seizures and Vice President Federico Franco assumed the presidency. Needless to say, however, the actual circumstances surrounding the land occupations are subject to debate. According to authorities, peasant squatters opened fire on police as the security forces moved in to eject them. The peasants, however, claim that the police had in fact conducted a massacre.

There's no evidence that the U.S. had a direct hand in Lugo's removal, yet judging from secret correspondence recently released by whistle-blowing outfit WikiLeaks, Washington will be somewhat relieved to have rid itself of Paraguay's pesky Bishop President. Indeed, from the Bush administration to the Obama White House, the American political establishment viewed Lugo's reformist presidency with a fair degree of suspicion. Though hardly what one would call a radical, Lugo nevertheless refused to ostracize Chávez and as a result the U.S. State Department spent a fair amount of time monitoring Paraguay's new leader.

Condi's Paranoid Mindset

Shortly prior to the 2008 election which brought Lugo to power, Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice asked for more information about Paraguay. In particular, Rice wanted to know how Lugo planned to manage relations with the U.S., Venezuela and Cuba. The Secretary of State's inquiries were not altogether surprising in light of the fact that Lugo had already warned the U.S. to keep its distance from South America's leftist tide. "I don't think the United States has any choice but to accept these changes", he remarked at one point.

Though Lugo was no Chávez protégé, the Paraguayan praised the Venezuelan "experiment" for its positive social accomplishments, as well as "the better distribution of wealth for the benefit of the poor majority." Furthermore, Lugo supported Chávez's land reform program and called the Venezuelan leader's 21st-century socialism "interesting", and "very stimulating."

Hardly amused by such talk, Rice requested Lugo's biometric data, including fingerprints, facial images, iris scans and even DNA. Concerned about the regional implications of the election, Rice wanted to know whether Cuba and Venezuela were offering financial support to any of the political candidates. Preoccupied with wider South American political integration along leftist lines, Rice also sought information about Venezuela's desire to join the Mercosur trade bloc, and asked whether Asunción intended to ratify Chávez's pending request.

Now on a tear, Rice also pressed her subordinates for information about Cuban and Venezuelan student exchange programs and philanthropic activities in Paraguay. Not stopping there, the Secretary of State also wanted to know Paraguay's position on Chávez's so called "Bank of the South" initiative, and the status of Venezuelan military assistance. Moreover, Rice requested information on communication practices of Venezuelan and Cuban officials in Paraguay, including telephone and fax numbers, e-mail addresses and even phone call history.

Concerned about a Lugo Victory

Though Paraguay is a small and landlocked nation with little geopolitical influence, Washington nevertheless engaged in a paranoid effort to monitor Hugo Chávez in the Southern Cone. Indeed, even before Lugo came to power, the U.S. Embassy in Asunción warned that Venezuela had established links with several Paraguayan social, political and religious organizations.

Later, in the midst of Lugo's bid for the presidency, U.S. officials sought out local municipal authorities who claimed that Venezuela had provided leadership training to peasant leaders. The U.S. Embassy was concerned about such links, remarking that Venezuelan Embassy officials had met with Bishop Lugo personally. Meanwhile, the Bush administration suspected that Venezuela had offered material support to leftist groups along the Paraguayan-Bolivian border which had in turn raised tensions.

In addition, the Americans were irked about "Misión Milagro", a Venezuelan health program which provided eye surgery operations to the poor. Sounds benign enough, but the Americans were worried as hundreds of poor Paraguayans had already flown to Cuba and Venezuela in what appeared to be an effort at "winning converts at the mass levels." "Many, perhaps a majority, of the program's participants", U.S. diplomats explained, "... are students who do not need eye surgeries but rather travel to Venezuela for long-term training to expand the 'Bolivarian Revolution'".

Paraguay Espionage

If anything, Washington's suspicions toward Lugo only increased after the latter assumed the Presidency in August, 2008. In something out of a spy novel, U.S. Ambassador James Cason warned Washington about Lugo's leftist ties. So-called "sensitive reporting" indicated that Lugo's inner circle had links to Chávez and supported the latter's "plans for Latin America." Furthermore, one of the parties in Lugo's coalition had supposedly received Venezuelan financial support and the new President himself had "loose ties" with a Marxist Leninist party which had developed an armed wing.

The U.S. Embassy in Asunción was also alarmed about the prospect that Lugo and Chávez would enhance energy collaboration. Since Paraguay was totally dependent on foreign oil, Lugo counted on petroleum giant Venezuela to provide 30% of his country's oil supply. Unfortunately for Paraguay, however, the oil imports caused Paraguay to fall into debt to Chávez. Perhaps, Chávez believed that he could enhance his own position in the Southern Cone by extracting concessions from an economically poor Paraguay. That, at least, was the fear at the U.S. Embassy which remarked in a cable that Paraguayan state oil company Petropar had rejected Chávez's calls for a joint venture with Venezuelan petroleum firm PdVSA. Lugo's conservative Vice President Federico Franco exclaimed for good measure that Chávez should not adopt an "imperialist attitude" toward Paraguay and Petropar's debt to Venezuela.

A Veritable "Tug of War"

Undeterred by the rightist opposition, Lugo ploughed ahead and signed a communications agreement with Chávez to expand South American/Cuban news channel Telesur, the bane of the U.S. right wing establishment. Adding fuel to the fire, the Paraguayan leader signed on to an educational initiative designed to promote the "values of Venezuelan Simón Bolívar", and expanded the Misión Milagro health plan. Setting off the alarm bell yet further amongst the Paraguayan landed elite, Lugo invited Chávez to his country to discuss rural collaboration. Chávez, who had already initiated his own land reform program in Venezuela, declared that he was willing to help Paraguay develop an "agro-industrial center" and provide agricultural and technical assistance.

Needless to say, the conservative Congress and media establishment were hardly pleased about Lugo's cozying up to Chávez. As far as they were concerned, Paraguay was doing just fine under U.S. assistance which included USAID health initiatives and a glorified "democracy program" designed to fight corruption and "give civil society a voice." Having accepted aid from not just Venezuela but also the U.S., Lugo now found himself in a veritable "tug of war" between the two antagonists and faced "continued criticism related to President Chávez's attempts to meddle in domestic politics." In addition, Lugo's increasingly more independent foreign policy was setting him on a collision course with conservative Vice President Federico Franco, who had promised earlier that Paraguay would not develop close ties with Venezuela.

Hillary Takes Charge

On the face of it, one might think that the Obama White House would have a less paranoid view of political developments in the Southern Cone. Yet, WikiLeaks cables belie any such notion, and, if anything, reinforce a sense of continuity between Condoleezza Rice and Hillary Clinton at the State Department. In 2009, in fact, Clinton thanked her subordinates for providing valuable information about Lugo, commending officials for illuminating the new Paraguayan President's daily routine and even his diet.

At times, it almost seemed as if the greenhorn Secretary of State regarded herself as more of a spook than a diplomat. "We value reports that highlight leaders'... strengths and weaknesses", Clinton remarked eagerly. In a follow up cable, Clinton was even more suspicious. What has Lugo said privately to U.S. diplomats about his attendance to the left-leaning ALBA, or Bolivarian Alliance of the Americas, Clinton asked? "Has Lugo expressed an interest in joining ALBA, and if so, what is his timeline for participating?" the Secretary of State pressed.

"Where is He Going?"

In a sense, Clinton's curiosity is hardly surprising. In one communication, the Embassy noted that "some are worried that Lugo and his key advisers are too far to the left for conservative Paraguay." Others, however, openly wondered, "Where is he [Lugo] going?" The new President was "a hard man to read", and while Lugo expressed admiration for conservative Chile he also praised Evo Morales and Fidel Castro. "Is Lugo trying to use (and perhaps stir up) peasant unrest to bring radical socialist-type change to the country or merely trying to address endemic and long-standing problems of inequality, poverty, and corruption?" diplomats wondered.

U.S. officials were quick to remark upon Lugo's media initiatives which stood to upset the established order, noting how Venezuela oversaw a panel titled "Telesur: a Latin American proposal" at a local communications forum. The channel had already been available in Paraguay for two years via satellite transmission, and needless to say the conservative media establishment was none too pleased. Speaking confidentially to the Americans, some believed that the forum was "the first shot fired by Lugo in the war to implement Chávez's Bolivarian revolution in Paraguay."

Lugo then stepped into another political minefield by accepting Venezuelan and Bolivian assistance to implement a Cuban literacy program. The move elicited a "sharp public reaction" from the rightist Paraguayan press, which asserted that the President was trying to introduce Bolivarian socialism into local schools. In a sign of just how vulnerable and isolated Lugo had become, the Paraguayan sought out the Americans personally and assured the U.S. Chargé d'Affaires that the program "would not push Cuban or any other ideology, but emphasize Paraguayan military heroes and history."

"Drowning Man Grasping a Lifeline"

By April, 2009, less than a year into his administration, the former Bishop's position had become untenable. Desperate for help, Lugo met personally with the U.S. Ambassador to discuss his own cabinet's messaging problem. Somewhat brazenly, the Americans seemed to believe that they could somehow "co-opt" the Lugo administration by taking over the government's own communication operations no less.

Writing to her superiors, the Ambassador recommended that "we provide [messaging and communication] assistance, starting with a diagnostic/scoping mission through USAID's Office of Transition Initiatives (OTI) [which in turn provides]... the kind of quick-hit, relatively inexpensive help that could make a difference in the public perceptions of this government." In a cryptic aside, the Ambassador added, "Post recommends we provide it, and in a timely manner, before someone else does."

Later, in a rather breathtaking display of government outsourcing, Lugo sent his own Communications Minister to meet with the USAID Director. The Ambassador wrote that the Paraguayan "responded to our offer of assistance as a drowning man would to an offer of a lifeline." The U.S. Embassy had secured the support of Lugo officials, but the Americans were still nervous about some members of the cabinet. In particular, Clinton was leery of Foreign Minister Héctor Lacognata and wanted to know whether the official had helped organize any activities on behalf of Venezuela.

The Secretary of State need not have worried. During a meeting with the Americans, Lacognata declared that he had personally advised Lugo not to support the return of ousted Honduran leader Manuel Zelaya. Lacognata said that in dealing with Honduras, countries should heed caution and not pay any attention to "vanguard nations" such as Venezuela and Ecuador which were pressing for Zelaya's speedy return. Such utterances went over well with the Americans, who remarked that Lacognata "continues to impress us with his methodical, decisive approach to getting things done."

Conflict over Mercosur

Despite all these many pressures and difficulties, the impudent Lugo continued to demonstrate independence, for example by supporting Venezuela's bid to join South American trade bloc Mercosur. As I explain in my second book, Chávez had long coveted membership in the grouping and hoped to inject his own progressive politics in what was otherwise a simple economic bloc. Not surprisingly, Lugo's support for Chávez led to opposition from the rightist Colorado Party in Congress and leading newspaper ABC Color, not to mention his own Vice President who remarked that he would not vote for Venezuela "even for all the gold in the world."

Faced with such odds, Lugo was obliged to shelve his support for Venezuela's bid so as to avoid "imminent rejection." However, the Americans believed that Chávez was still intent on pursuing the Mercosur matter and "Venezuela is rumored to be increasing its lobbying efforts to sway- or buy - votes one-by-one." Pouring cold water on the Mercosur bid, however, Foreign Minister Lacognata remarked in a sarcastic aside to U.S. diplomats that Venezuelan admission "won't happen here even if Chávez dresses up like Santa Claus."

Political Fallout of the WikiLeaks Scandal

If tensions were not acute enough already, the WikiLeaks scandal itself soon heightened the political crisis in Paraguay yet further. In a huge breakthrough in 2010, Julian Assange published reams of State Department correspondence in what came to be known as the "Cablegate" scandal. In the Asunción media, certain cables received widespread play, particularly those dealing with U.S. spying on Paraguay and Lugo's alledged links to Chávez. If the Paraguayan President had any doubts about U.S. intentions toward his country, leaked cables probably served to reinforce his own sense of paranoia.

If anything, however, the cables must have served as an acute embarrassment to the Lugo administration which was revealed as totally inept and exceedingly subservient to the U.S. Placed in a very uncomfortable position, Lugo declared that his government would seriously analyze the leaks with particular regard to American interference in Paraguay's internal affairs. Lugo added that Foreign Minister Lacognata - whose own reputation was tarnished from the WikiLeaks scandal - would hold private talks with the Americans about the diplomatic fallout.

Did Lugo Get the Note?

With the gloves now off, one would have thought that Lugo would deepen ties to Chávez and South America's left bloc, but if anything the President's reaction to Cablegate was remarkably muted. Indeed, Lugo even declared that the cables would not undermine or harm U.S.-Paraguayan relations. Since the WikiLeaks cache ends in late 2010, it's difficult to assess the more recent diplomatic fallout between Washington and Asunción. On the face of it, however, Lugo seems to have thought - perhaps naively - that he could somehow muddle through and preserve ties to U.S. while still cultivating links with Chávez.

Courting more controversy, Lugo traveled to Caracas in July, 2011 on a surprise visit. There, he met with Chávez to discuss a wide range of issues including Petropar's debt to PdVSA. Later, Lugo hailed the consolidation of the so-called Community of Latin American and Caribbean Nations, also known as Celac, a bloc which stood as an alternative to the Organization of American States but excluding the United States. And tenaciously, Lugo refused to give up on Venezuela's bid to join Mercosur, declaring that he would support a modification of the trade bloc's rules which would allow him to bypass the Paraguayan Congress altogether, thereby fast tracking Chávez's request.

Lingering Questions

Fast forward a year to Lugo's ouster and the question on many people's minds is whether the U.S. may have played a hidden role in the President's removal from power. Recently, a host of individuals and organizations throughout Latin America called attention to the tumultuous politics in Paraguay by signing a letter of protest. "Paraguay and its people are victims of their enormous natural wealth, and the fact that they are situated in an area of strategic importance for the accumulation of capital through continental megaprojects", the letter reads. The U.S. and the Pentagon's Southern Command, the letter signers charge, carried out the Paraguayan coup by allying to local elites and transnational corporations.

The allegations are certainly inflammatory, but how much evidence can be marshaled to support such claims? Without sounding too conspiratorial, there's certainly evidence that the U.S. was unhappy about Lugo's distancing from the Pentagon and the Southern Command [for more on this, see my earlier al-Jazeera column here]. Over at the State Department meanwhile, both Rice and Clinton sounded the alarm bell on Lugo or alternatively hoped to "co-opt" the Paraguayan in the hopes that he would not fall under Chávez's dreaded influence. Some WikiLeaks cables, meanwhile, indicate that U.S. diplomats knew the Paraguayan right was conspiring against Lugo, though it's unclear if they had any particular foreknowledge of the most recent crisis.

Postscript

Despite these many gaps, some reports suggest that there was a lot more going on beneath the surface during Lugo's ouster. In an unbelievably suspicious development, Weekly News Update on the Americas reports that even as Congress was moving to impeach Lugo, a group of U.S. generals met with legislators to discuss the possibility of building a military base in the Paraguayan Chaco region. Meanwhile, the Obama administration has failed to back Lugo's reinstatement, preferring instead to issue a couple of tepid and noncommittal responses to the political crisis.

No sooner had Paraguayan legislators convened with the Americans than they leveled serious charges against Venezuela. According to the new Franco government, the Venezuelan Foreign Minister met with high level Paraguayan military officials shortly prior to Lugo's impeachment and encouraged the army to defend Lugo during the political crisis. In retaliation for the alled\ged interference, Paraguay expelled the Venezuelan Ambassador, prompting Chávez to cut off oil shipments in an escalating tit-for-tat. Chávez's left-leaning Bolivarian Alliance of the Americas, meanwhile, has condemned Lugo's ouster and member nations recently expelled USAID for supposed interference in their own internal political affairs.

Coups 2.0?

Chávez himself has likened the events in Paraguay to the forcible removal of Manuel Zelaya in Honduras. It's an interesting comparison since Zelaya, like Lugo, lost his position under similarly mysterious circumstances in 2009. Though Honduran conservatives were certainly aligned with the interests of the U.S. right and defense establishment, it's difficult to prove any close or orchestrated collaboration between the two during the Zelaya coup, and we may never know whether Obama himself may have given the green light.

Perhaps, like Honduras, we shall have a difficult time getting at the ultimate truth in Paraguay. In light of the Obama administration's relentless crackdown on whistle-blowing, it seems unlikely that we will ever gain any insight into what the Pentagon or other intelligence gathering operations [including the FBI, which has played a role in the Southern Cone] have been doing in Paraguay. For a president who once promised great transparency, it certainly comes as a grave disappointment.

2012-07-18 WIKILEAKS PRESS RELEASE: WikiLeaks opens path through banking siege. Donations open.

After almost two years of fighting an unlawful banking blockade by U.S financial giants VISA and MasterCard, WikiLeaks has announced it is back open for donations.

After WikiLeaks' publications revealing U.S. war crimes and statecraft in 2010, U.S. financial institutions erected a banking blockade against WikiLeaks wholly outside of any judicial or administrative process. The blockade came during a time of substantial economic growth for WikiLeaks but blocked over 95% of donations, costing the organization in excess of USD 20M.

The Wau Holland Transparency Reports for WikiLeaks' finances, released today, illustrate the financial consequences of 18 consecutive months of economic censorship. For the year 2011, the blockade resulted in WikiLeaks' income falling to just 21% of its operating costs.

WikiLeaks has been forced to run on its cash reserves at the Wau Holland Foundation, which have diminished from EUR 800K at the end of December 2010, to less than EUR 100K at the end of June 2012. As the graph shows, WikiLeaks' reserve funds will expire at the current austere rate of expenditure within a few months. In order to effectively continue its mission, WikiLeaks must raise a minimum of EUR 1M immediately.

Against this background, WikiLeaks is launching a new payment gateway designed to work around the blockade.

The French credit card system, Carte Bleue, is coupled with the VISA/Mastercard system globally. VISA and Mastercard are contractually barred from directly cutting off merchants through the Carte Bleue system. The French non-profit FDNN (Fund for the Defense of Net Neutrality- Fonds de Défense de la Net Neutralité), has set up a Carte Bleue fund for WikiLeaks.

WikiLeaks advises all global supporters to make use of this avenue immediately before VISA/MasterCard attempts to shut it down.

However, WikiLeaks and FDNN are ready for the fight. Julian Assange, WikiLeaks founder said "We beat them in Iceland and, by god, we'll beat them in France as well. Let them shut it down. Let them demonstrate to the world once again their corrupt pandering to Washington. We're waiting. Our lawyers are waiting. The whole world is waiting. Do it."

WikiLeaks is pursuing several actions against the blockade.

Last week, WikiLeaks won a landmark lawsuit against VISA Iceland (Valitor). In July 2011 WikiLeaks opened a path through the blockade, when VISA-Valitor agreed to process payments to WikiLeaks through the Icelandic payment gateway, Datacell. Soon afterwards, VISA-Valitor blocked donations and ended its relationship with Datacell, in violation of its contractual obligations. Delivering its judgment last week, the Icelandic court in Reykjavík ruled that the donation gateway should be reopened by July 26, otherwise VISA-Valitor will be penalized with a fine of 800 000 ISK daily.

A European Commission preliminary investigation into the blockade was started July 2011. A Commission decision on whether to pursue the financial services companies involved in the blockade is expected before the end of August.

The UN Special Rapporteur for Freedom of Expression, Frank La rue, the European Parliament, the New York Times editorial and many rights groups have condemned the blockade.

Australian Greens Senator Scott Ludlam last week called on the Australian government to take domestic actions against the banking blockade.

LINKS:

FDNN-WikiLeaks Payment Gateway (Donate Here): http://wikileaks.org/donate

Wau Holland Monthly Balance sheet for the years 2010, 2011 and 2012: http://wauland.de/files/2010-2012_Projekt04-Balance.pdf

Wau Holland Transparency Report for 2011: http://wauland.de/files/2011_Transparenzbericht-Projekt04_en.pdf

Auf Deutsch: http://wauland.de/files/2011_Transparenzbericht-Projekt04_de.pdf

Wau Holland Transparency Report for 2012: http://wauland.de/files/2012-1_Transparenzbericht-Projekt04_en.pdf

Auf Deutsch: http://wauland.de/files/2012-1_Transparenzbericht-Projekt04_de.pdf

For more information on the WikiLeaks banking blockade see http://wikileaks.org/Banking-Blockade

For WikiLeaks press contacts see http://wikileaks.org/Press

2012-07-18 WikiLeaks News Update: WikiLeaks opens credit card donations; Bradley Manning's pre-trial hearings resume




WikiLeaks has been financially blockaded without process for 592 days.
Julian Assange has been detained without charge for 589 days.
- 29 days at the Ecuadorian Embassy.
Bradley Manning has been imprisoned without trial for 786 days.
A secret Grand Jury has been active in the U.S. without transparency for 672 days.


WikiLeaks News (General):

  • WikiLeaks announced that it is opening up credit card donations after nearly two years of a financial blockade. They will be processing the donations through French company Carte Bleue. WikiLeaks asks supporters to act fast before VISA and MasterCard attempt to shut this avenue down. In order to effectively continue its mission, WikiLeaks hopes to raise a minimum of EUR 1M.
  • Video of the HOPE Number 9 panel on "WikiLeaks, Whistleblowers, and the War on the First Amendment" is now on YouTube. The panelists were ACLU lawyers Ben Wizner, Catherine Crump, and John Reinstein. Much of the discussion focused on the WikiLeaks Grand Jury.
  • David House published his notes from his testimony before the WikiLeaks Grand Jury, June 2011.
  • The U.S. Government's expense on secrecy has increased nearly 30% in the past three years. Lt. Col. Jim Gregory, a Pentagon spokesman, said while WikiLeaks' releases may have played a role in the increase, it was not "the largest piece".
  • The Australian Prime Minister's department declared Julia Gillard's signature on official documents to be "irrelevant" in an effort to conceal information about her handling of sensitive briefings on WikiLeaks.
  • U.S. Congress is considering prosecuting journalists who write articles based on leaked information. Firedoglake's Kevin Gosztola wrote about this initiative.
  • Costa Rica passed a new law which modified espionage to computer-related information transfer, which seems to be an attempt to prevent whistleblowing and WikiLeaks-type disclosures.
  • Green Left Weekly posted transcripts of speeches given during the July 15 rally for WikiLeaks and Julian Assange in Sydney. The speeches are from human rights lawyer Kellie Tranter, activist Cassie Findlay, Maritime Union of Australia Sydney branch secretary Paul McAleer, and activist Gail Malone. Videos from the rally are available as well.
  • Noseweek published an in-depth article on WikiLeaks and Julian Assange, covering both the past and present, with excerpts from an interview with lawyer Jennifer Robinson.
  • Global Post interviewed Frontline Club owner Vaughan Smith about WikiLeaks, Julian Assange, and journalism.
  • John Pilger spoke at the London's South Bank Literary Festival on WikiLeaks, Julian Assange, and the crisis in journalism.
  • The final season of 'Damages' is centered on a WikiLeaks and Julian Assange-esque plot.


WikiLeaks News (Releases):

  • Using data from WikiLeaks' Afghan War Logs, researchers were able to accurately predict future conflicts, something the Department of Defense was unable to do itself.

Syria Files (image via WikiLeaks)

  • WikiLeaks released more Syria Files, bringing the total to 161.
    • Syrian security received comms from the West.
    • Asma al-Assad went on a £270,000 online shopping spree as violence was escalating in Syria.
    • A Syrian doctor's pleas for asylum fell on deaf ears.
    • George Galloway wrote to Bashar al-Assad calling his government the "last castle of Arab dignity".
    • A series of emails details the relationship between the Syrian Communist Party and Italian and Spanish communists.
    • Young Spanish Communists do not trust the Spanish media and are asking their Syrian comrades for the truth.
    • A Qatari royal and founder of the Qatar International Islamic Bank, Sheikh Ali bin Abdullah al-Thani, began rapidly selling off Syrian International Islamic Bank shares in the final weeks of July 2011.
    • Skepticism over notorious business tycoon and cousin of President Bashar al-Assad Rami Makhlouf's sudden metamorphosis into a do-gooder was not unwarranted.
    • Emails seem to confirm The Guardian's prior claims that emails from "Sam" are from Bashar al-Assad. Al Akhbar went into the details and contents of these emails.
    • U.S. firm Brown Lloyd James encouraged 'fist and open hand' in Syria.
    • Emails show Bashar al-Assad being very critical toward the English language.
  • An article in The Sunday Leader looked at WikiLeaks cables and what they say about Sri Lankan politician and businessman Milinda Moragoda.
  • The Ecuadorian Government offers a guide on how to read WikiLeaks cables.


Julian Assange News:

  • Swedish journalist and feminist Helene Bergman wrote on her first meeting with Julian Assange.
  • Law Report host Anita Barraud was on ABC Breakfast discussing Julian Assange, the WikiLeaks Grand Jury, and the possibility of U.S. extradition.
  • Author Oscar Swartz was on Agenda discussing what might happen to Julian Assange if he is extradited to Sweden. The full episode is available online.
  • Ecuadorian President Rafael Correa stated that his government would not be affected by pressure from other countries regarding the decision on Julian Assange's asylum.
  • Just Foreign Policy started a new petition which calls for Sweden to promise it will not extradite Julian Assange to the U.S. Their previous petition urging President Correa to accept Mr Assange into asylum currently has over 7,000 signatures and was hand-delivered to the Ecuadorian Embassy.
  • The Australian Greens posted videos of Senator Scott Ludlam asking a question about Stratfor and Julian Assange and then making a statement regarding the vacant and ambiguous response.
  • James Johnson CHR posted the script of a speech about Julian Assange, discussing the injustices he has faced and calling on people to support him.
  • Asian Correspondent posted a new interview with Christine Assange where she discusses Julian's asylum bid, his current status, and the issues with Sweden's handling of the allegations. Global Ethix also published the first part of an in-depth interview with Christine Assange.
  • The new villain in "Call of Duty: Black Ops 2" is "Raul Menendez, described as the “idolized Messiah of the 99%”—a Julian Assange-like character".
  • Chilean newspaper El Mostrador has put out a series of ads depicting famous dead people burying the living with the phrase "News changes fast", including one featuring Steve Jobs burying Julian Assange.


Bradley Manning News:

Image

  • Bradley Manning has motion hearings all this week.
    • Nathan Fuller wrote a preview of what to expect over the entire week. All the defence motions are available to read.
    • Kevin Gosztola is running daily live blogs and Alexa O'Brien is posting live video updates of this week's hearings.
    • Bradley's lawyer argued that it would be difficult to find jurors who are unaware of the case.
    • Bradley's defence compared the government's effort to prevent the reference of information in damage reports to the case of NSA whistleblower Thomas Drake.
    • Chase Madar was on RT discussing Bradley's hearings and Obama becoming the number one enemy of whistleblowers.
    • Antiwar.com interviewed Nathan Fuller of the Bradley Manning Support Network about this week's motion hearings.
    • Judge Lind allowed prosecutors to proceed with the "aiding the enemy" charged, but warned them that they would have to prove Bradley leaked the documents with that effect in mind.
    • David Coombs argued that Bradley was authorized to read secret U.S. cables and should not be charged with electronically "breaking-in" to the records.
    • The defence argued that President Barack Obama's comments may have damaged the possibility of a fair trail.
  • Supporters of Bradley Manning held a three day occupation of the Federal Court House in Los Angeles.



............................................

Upcoming Dates & Events:

July 18 - 20: Bradley Manning pre-trial hearings.

August 27 - 31: Bradley Manning pre-trial hearings.

September 19 - 20: Bradley Manning pre-trial hearings.

November 2012 ~ January 2013: Estimated time frame for Bradley Manning's court martial.

2012-07-21 WikiLeaks News Update: Manning pre-trial hearing session concludes; Syria Files coverage




WikiLeaks has been financially blockaded without process for 595 days.
Julian Assange has been detained without charge for 592 days.
- 32 days at the Ecuadorian Embassy.
Bradley Manning has been imprisoned without trial for 789 days.
A secret Grand Jury has been active in the U.S. without transparency for 675 days.


WikiLeaks News:

  • OWNI reported on a collection of Syria Files which contain jokes by Bashar al-Assad, and show the shift in his attitude once the uprising began.
  • Former Egyptian Vice President Omar Suleiman died this week. WikiLeaks Press has an archive of WikiLeaks cable coverage relating to him.
  • WikiLeaks cables show that Washington will be somewhat relieved to have former Paraguayan President Fernando Lugo out of power.
  • The Australian Government's FOI Disclosure Log has been updated with a document that lists "talking points" and other information regarding WikiLeaks, Julian Assange, and Bradley Manning.
  • Legal expert Anita Barraud stated in a radio interview that the WikiLeaks Grand Jury may contain illegally obtained evidence and hearsay.

Ethan McCord. Image via OurLivesOurRights.org.

  • Ethan McCord, the soldier seen on the ground saving children in "Collateral Murder", posted a photo for Our Lives Our Rights about how he refused orders because he could not ignore the suffering of innocent people.
  • Video of NSA whistleblower William Binney's HOPE Number 9 keynote is now available.
  • Australian lawyer and human rights activist Kellie Tranter gave a speech addressing the people of the United States and asking them to make the plight of WikiLeaks, Julian Assange, and Bradley Manning an issue in the upcoming election.


Julian Assange News:

  • 1976 Nobel Peace Prize laureate Mairead Maguire urged Ecuadorian President Rafael Correa to grant Julian Assange political asylum.
  • Fred Fuentes, co-convenor of the Latin American Social Forum, gave a speech on July 15 entitled "Support Ecuador! Support Assange!"
  • Julian Assange's lawyer Michael Ratner sent a response to The Washington Post for its editorial suggesting the U.S. cut trade preferences with Ecuador should they accept Mr Assange into asylum.
  • A preview of upcoming Four Corners episode "Sex, Lies, and Julian Assange" is available. The episode premieres July 23 at 8:30PM on ABC1.


Bradley Manning News:

Image

  • A session of pre-trial hearings for Bradley Manning concluded on Thursday. See our previous news update for coverage from the first two days.
    • The Bradley Manning Support Network posted a recap of the four-day pre-trial hearings from this week. The next motion hearings will be from August 27-31 and will focus on Bradley Manning's treatment at Quantico Marine Base.
    • The WikiLeaks Grand Jury may be sending people to attend Bradley Manning's legal proceedings.
    • The judge barred UN Special Rapporteur on Torture Juan Mendez from testifying as a defence witness. Earlier this year, Mr Mendez condemned the treatment of PFC Manning as "cruel, inhuman, and degrading".
    • The judge ruled that the extent of damage caused by WikiLeaks releases is irrelevant to any of the 22 charges against PFC Manning. Manning's lawyer has stated that the disclosures caused no damage to the U.S.
    • The defence declared that the treatment of PFC Manning should "shock the conscience of the court".
    • The judge refused to throw out two of the charges against PFC Manning.
    • Potential jurors of Bradley's court martial will have to respond to more than 100 questions in a pre-trial screening.
    • Bradley's defence argued that President Barack Obama's comments may have damaged the possibility of a fair trial.
    • The schedule for future motion hearings is August 27-31, September 13, and October 15-19.
    • Bradley Manning attorney David Coombs will be speaking at a public event on August 26 in Washington D.C. Details will be announced soon.
  • Cenk Uygur of The Young Turks gave a speech in support of Bradley Manning and WikiLeaks at Occupy LA on July 14. Watch video of his speech below.
  • The Bradley Manning Support Network is one of the many orginasations taking action against President Obama's July 23 Oakland fundraiser, calling for an end to the wars, the closure of Guantanamo, the end of torture, and the freedom of Bradley Manning.



............................................

Upcoming Dates & Events:

July 23: "Sex, Lies, and Julian Assange" premieres on ABC1, 8:30PM.

July 26: Deadline for Valitor to resume donations to WikiLeaks, or be faced with daily fines.

August 26: Manning lawyer David Coombs to speak in Washington DC.

August 27 - 31: Bradley Manning pre-trial hearings.

September 13: Bradley Manning pre-trial hearings.

November 2012 ~ January 2013: Estimated time frame for Bradley Manning's court martial.

2012-07-23 A Short Chat With Christine Assange

WikiLeaks supporters around the globe are informed, talented, and wonderfully passionate people. But supporting WikiLeaks day after day, week after week, month after month, can be an emotional roller coaster. We all have our highs and lows, and surely nobody knows that better than Julian Assange's mum Christine.

So I decided to take up Christine's publicly tweeted offer for an interview, and have a chat about things from a supporter's point of view. Of course Christine's thoughts and opinions are not official WikiLeaks statements. But I hope everyone who aspires to support WikiLeaks can draw some inspiration from our discussion...

*

ME: What have you been up to since you got back from London? I've noticed lots of interviews!

CA: Going on Twitter has worked really well. It's great to be able to put out notices and communicate with people outside the mainstream media. But even some of the mainstream media have picked up on my tweets - I did a couple of BBC interviews, and one in Spain, and one in Russia Today.

ME: It's great that you are getting out to different audiences, not just the WikiLeaks supporters who are already "locked in".

CA: Well, that's the idea, but I do still love to be in contact with WikiLeaks supporters because we are all fighting this fight together. Hopefully I give them some energy, info and ideas, and they certainly give me some!

You're right, trying to get into the mainstream news is important, and I've done interviews with some women's magazines, for example. But I also did one with the Hackers News, and I'm about to do one with Anonymous [AnonPlusRadio]. Now those are obviously in the same area, but slightly different, because they are not just WikiLeaks supporters. So it's worth branching out, because issues like Free Press and Democracy do affect everybody.

ME: Julian's move to the Ecuadorian embassy has changed the dynamics a bit. Do you have any sort of gut feeling for where things are likely to go from here?

CA: No, not really. I know where I would LIKE things to be! But it's really up to the President now. It's his call.

He's already been good enough to take Julian into safe sanctuary, and we all thank him for that. It was a brave move - Ecuador is only a small country - but he is a President who stands up to the US, he threw their military base out, but he does have to take into account the ramifications and he's seeking advice from other countries at the moment.

ME: I speak Spanish so I've been following the Ecuadorian newspapers a bit. One of the big issues is that Correa has been putting pressure on these rich families that own the media over there, and he's been copping criticism from groups like Reporters Without Borders for doing that. So the Ecuadorian media criticism is muted, but they are saying for example that Ecuador might lose US economic support because of Assange.

CA: Sounds like The Australian, doesn't it? Or the Herald Sun!

ME: If you can imagine a country with seven Rupert Murdochs, perhaps that's what he's facing. I don't know.

CA: That's exactly what he's facing. I've gone into it and what's happened is exactly what's happening in our country: the media are acting for corporate and foreign interests. Correa has taken a very strong stance for independence, and the media are trying to white-ant that stance.

And unfortunately some people appear to have a fixed mantra in their head about what is right and wrong, and are not willing to be flexible and make it situation-specific. You have to actually investigate those stories before making a decision.

ME: It's going to be interesting to follow what happens there, because perhaps the outcome will have consequences for groups like Reporters Without Borders, when they start to see the other side of things. This could be another unintended consequence of what Julian's been doing.

CA: Well, it's amazing isn't it? What WikiLeaks started has been a catalyst for so many things. Because it's exposed the core of the structure, so it's not just one aspect that's going to be affected by it - it's many aspects.

ME: People are being forced to choose a side, aren't they? It's a bit like John Howard's old "wedge politics".

CA: I think that's true, and it's really interesting to see who chooses which side. Some people are not fully informed, so they are choosing a side without real information. But if they ARE fully informed, and they choose the side that would suppress the free press and uphold the current abuse of power throughout the world, then they are revealing a lot about themselves. And I think it's really interesting to see which newspapers and journalists and politicians are standing up for WikiLeaks, and which are standing up for the big corporations.

ME: It's certainly been interesting here in Australia. Did you see Tony Abbott in the USA the other day, saying "most Australians don't think of the US as a foreign country"?

CA: Well what can you expect from a man who stood up at the dinner when Obama came over, with a shake in his voice, and mistily said "You are the President.. of the world!" It was a race to the bottom, between Gillard and Abbott, to see who could grovel the most.

ME: It's all very revealing, with Carr and Roxon as well. At least it shows us where we are, and what we are up against.

CA: If you look at it historically, I try to take heart from the fact that this is a major, historical shift in humanity. This is like the Industrial Revolution. That's the size of the technological shift, because of the Internet, and as a result there comes a shift for Democracy, either for better or worse.

And because it's such a huge shift, there's going to be a lot of opposition. And these things don't happen overnight. It's of earthquake proportions for the power structure that's currently running the show, and they are going to be grabbing on for grim death and trying to suppress everyone who's wanting to go with the flow of the technology.

ME: Yes, you can imagine Bradley Manning, even if he's sentenced to a life in jail, might yet end up celebrated as a national hero.

CA: Well, he might end up as a politician! Look at Nelson Mandela!

ME: Yes, he was branded a terrorist.

CA: Exactly. So I think maybe we are in for a long haul.

ME: How do you cope with that? It must be very emotionally exhausting. What's your advice for supporters?

CA: It's quite draining, fighting the negativity that is coming out from the other side. But if you are feeling drained, just stop. Take a break. I do it. I just stop, take a few days off, or just take an afternoon off and go and do something that I like.

It's important that you get some physical exercise and still enjoy your hobbies and all the rest of it, because if you can do that then you will be able to stay in for the long haul. And it's a war we're involved in, a war for our freedom and a war for the Internet - that's where it's centred - and this is not going to be over any time soon.

When we win a battle, we all cheer and feel good. When we lose a battle, we know it's just one battle in the longer war.

We shouldn't get too down-hearted when one of the things that we do doesn't work. OK, so that one didn't work, but look at all these ones that HAVE worked! We learn, and we get up, and we start again. But do pass the baton when you are getting tired - you are human. We're not machines.

ME: Right.

CA: Of course these are critical moments for Julian and Bradley right now, but we mustn't get burned out either. We need to conserve our energies and think smartly.

I am not speaking as an expert, just as an ordinary human being, but personally, I have to conserve my own energy and decide where I am going to speak and how much energy I am going to give to this or to that.

At this stage, thinking strategically like that is important. Is a demonstration the best way to go right now? Would it be better to have a benefit concert? Or should we vary things and set up some tables for a stall? Or go and talk to your local club? You know, something that isn't of an order of magnitude to organise.

ME: Yeah, one of the inspiring things about Julian and the WikiLeaks team in London is how they keep coming up with new ideas that nobody expected. They always use a lot of imagination and get the public's attention.

CA: Yes, and we can do similar things. You could have for example a Balloon Day, where everyone buys a balloon and writes "FREE JULIAN!" on it. Simple things.

It's important, to help people be a part of this, to understand what else they have going on in their lives. They have got their kids, work, and so on. So are there things that we could be doing which are simple and fun, but still make the point?

It doesn't have to be nation-wide. One person, a couple, or a small group can decide to do something, all on their own, and others can copy them if it works.

For example, one couple I met is going around Rotary clubs in their region. It's important to get the facts out to the public, and you can do that via groups of ordinary people.

Look at universities, for example, which have lots of young people at an age where they are questioning authority, and enthusiastic about new ideas. Or unions, because many of the issues WikiLeaks cover involve exploitation, so if you can organise a meeting or approach your union rep, maybe that's a way to get people interested.

And many immigrants have voiced their concerns to me. Many of them fled totalitarian regimes, and they are some of the most aware and concerned people about this shift towards losing our freedom and civil liberties. So if you are a member of a migrant group, or if you have friends in a particular community, maybe you can share some information from WikiLeaks cables.

ME: We've had WikiLeaks rallies growing in Australia and around the world for a while. Do you think they are having a real impact? Do you think people should keep doing that, or is it time for a change of direction?

CA: I think rallies are good! They are probably most effective when they are at a critical moment, because that's when the media is focussed on it, and also when people are getting angry and wanting to do something physical.

Rallies work on a number of levels. The media of course can report on them, and because this whole situation with Julian is so dragged out, it's important to keep punctuating this within the news cycle.

Of course there's a lot of effort that goes into organising a big rally, and people might look at the turnout and then wonder if this is going to have a real impact. But what they need to remember is that it's not just the people who turn up, it's all the passers-by that see them, and the people in buildings that see them, and the media that report on it (including social media) so it can go all over the world.

When you're having a rally, it's worth remembering that you are staging a media event as much as anything, and that has ramifications around the globe. It shows that people still care, that it's a growing movement. And the more people that go, the more others will be encouraged to join, especially if they see it as something they can identify with.

ME: You obviously have a unique perspective, because Julian is your son. You have to be more cautious than others about what you do and say in public. Do you sometimes get frustrated with other supporters, who come at things from a different angle?

CA: Um, not frustrated so much, but more just being aware of the way that the media relate to it. For example, a negative person in the media can focus on just one person from a protest, and then use that person to paint a negative picture of the whole protest.

It helps to have a wide cross-section of different-looking people, if you can. I'm not putting down anyone for the way they look, OK? Of course we are all individuals! But if you are going to do something for the media, then you want it to have maximum impact. So it's good to think the way the media thinks, and think the way the enemy thinks about your cause, and think of how the general public are going to view it.

It's all about being media-savvy, isn't it? Like it or not, we all get judged by the way we look and the way we behave.

We also need to be careful about mixing up the messages. For example, some critics want to smear WikiLeaks as a fringe movement, so if someone at a rally has a sign supporting some cause other than Julian or WikiLeaks, then they might just focus on that. Of course we want people from all different groups to come and support WikiLeaks, but if they can just leave those other issues at home, for the purposes of a more effective rally, then that's appreciated.

But I'm hugely appreciative of all the effort that so many great people have put into these rallies. I am not an experienced person at rallies myself, so I really appreciate other people who have more experience at these things!

ME: I guess we need to pitch a big tent, and everybody's got a part to play.

CA: That's right.

ME: I saw one good thing at the recent Sydney rally, where they were selling badges from @SomersetBean to collect donations. In WikiLeaks' current financial situation, it's great to see people not just protesting, but also raising money.

CA: Yes, raising money and handing out flyers as well, so that there's something people can take home, maybe with the facts about Julian and WikiLeaks on one side, and on the other side how they can help, and contacts.

At the forums in Canberra and Newcastle they had a book, where people could put their names down if they wanted to join the local group. I thought that was a really good idea. The forums were a good way to inform people about the facts. Because if people don't know what's going on, they are not going to get out and demonstrate.

ME: I'm just thinking that with WikiLeaks now getting very low on funds, maybe supporters who are not so keen on demonstrations could focus on fundraising instead?

CA: Yes, I saw a charity with a little table outside the local supermarket the other day. I'm not sure how that would go, but it only requires one or two people to do it. You could get a table at a market stall, for example, where you are out fundraising, but also handing out literature. So then when a demonstration comes along, then people are already tuned in to the issues.

ME: I like that idea! We all have our own skills and interests, but we all need a change sometimes.

Do you have a final message for supporters, Christine?

CA: It's just amazing the way that you all keep going. I had to keep going because I was the mum. But the commitment and passion that so many supporters are showing, not just to get justice for Julian, but also freedom and democracy in their countries, and for their people, is really inspiring. And they just keep coming back, and back, and back.

And that certainly makes a difference for me, and for Julian, and we both thank you from the bottom of our hearts.

ME: Well, I can't speak for everybody, but from myself, you and Julian and everyone else that I have met through WikiLeaks have been inspiring to me.

CA: And that's the most positive part of this thing. If I was asked would I repeat it all again, I'd say no, I don't want my son out there. As a mother, that's what I would say. But as a citizen, what WikiLeaks has done has been a good thing for everyone, and I have also met some really amazing people, and I have learned so much from those people, whether meeting them in person or reading their ideas, but also on my Twitter stream.

Everybody knows I am not a computer person, but since getting on Twitter I've been learning so much. So thank you so much to all the people who post things - I don't know if that's the right term - but put stuff on my Twitter stream. I do get locked out a lot, sometimes it's days before I can do anything, but it's all up there when I get back in. They keep educating me, and I get the majority of my news online these days.

It's also been a pleasant surprise for me to discover so many US supporters who understand that WikiLeaks is not anti-American. Julian is an admirer of the US Constitution and there are many wonderful, intelligent people doing great work over there.

ME: We live in interesting times, don't we? I have often wished I'd lived to experience the 1960's and all those changes. But this is equally momentous.

CA: I've seen both. This is a very similar situation, but we've now got technology involved as well.

ME: Hopefully the long-term consequences are a bit more permanent this time.

CA: It gets back to being realistic. There's always going to be greedy, psychopathic types around. You are not going to stop that. The world is never going to be perfect. But by us being vigilant, we can hold back the tide a bit. That's all people have ever been able to do, control the excesses of it.

And it gets back to the old saying, "Evil flourishes when good men do nothing." We've got a responsibility to leave this world in the best shape we can, for our kids.

ME: Christine Assange, thank you so much for your time.

CA: Thank you, and thanks again to everyone who is supporting Julian and WikiLeaks.

2012-07-24 PRESS RELEASE: Baltasar Garzón will lead legal team representing Julian Assange and WikiLeaks

Tue Jul 24 19:36:07 UTC 2012
Statement approved by Julian Assange and Baltasar Garzón.

The Spanish judge, lawyer, and international jurist, Baltasar Garzón, will lead the legal team representing Julian Assange and WikiLeaks. The jurist met with Julian Assange at the Ecuadorian embassy in the United Kingdom recently. The purpose of the meeting was to discuss the new legal strategy which will defend both WikiLeaks and Julian Assange from the existing abuse of process; expose the arbitrary, extrajudicial actions by the international financial system which target Julian Assange and WikiLeaks specifically; and show how the secret US processes against Julian Assange and WikiLeaks have compromised and contaminated other legal processes, including the extradition process against Mr Assange. Despite having been imprisoned, fiscally blockaded, and placed under house arrest for over 650 days, Mr. Assange has not been charged with an offense in any country.

Baltasar Garzón revolutionized the international justice system two decades ago by issuing an international arrest warrant for the former Head of State of Chile, Augusto Pinochet. His actions spearheaded the fight against impunity in Latin America and in the rest of the world. The judge has expressed serious concerns regarding the lack of safeguards and transparency with which actions are being taken against Julian Assange, and the harassment he is being subjected to which has irreparable effects on his physical and mental wellbeing. The threats against his person are further aggravated by the complicit behaviour of the Swedish and UK governments, who are wrongfully abrogating his rights.

More information:

http://is.gd/GGhZUk
http://www.abc.net.au/4corners/stories/2012/07/19/3549280.htm
http://justice4assange.com
http://www.alexaobrien.com/secondsight/wikileaks/grand_jury/

===== Spanish ======

El Juez español, abogado y jurista Internacional Baltasar Garzón asumirá la dirección jurídica del equipo de abogados que representa a Julian Assange y Wikileaks. El Jurista, celebró una reunión privada con Julian Assange en la sede de la Embajada Ecuatoriana en Londres, para discutir una nueva y contundente estrategia jurídica que buscará defender tanto a WikiLeaks, como a su fundador, de los abusos de proceso y de arbitrariedades del Sistema Financiero internacional que pondrán de manifiesto el alcance real de la operación contra Julian Assange, en la que el proceso secreto que se le sigue en los Estados Unidos de América supone una clara amenaza que vicia cualquier otro proceso, como el que motiva la petición de extradición para ser cuestionado en Suecia, solicitud que aparece como mero instrumento para conseguir aquella finalidad.

Baltasar Garzón, que hace dos décadas revolucionó la justicia internacional al hacer efectiva una orden de aprehensión contra el ex Jefe de Estado chileno Augusto Pinochet, lo que permitió importantísimos avances en la lucha contra la impunidad en Latinoamérica y el mundo entero, mostró su grave preocupacion por la ausencia de garantías con las que se está actuando contra Julian Assange y el acoso al que está siendo sometido, con consecuencias irreparables para su propia salud física y mental. Riesgo que se ha agravado con la actitud coactiva del gobierno británico que, sin ofrecer garantías creíbles respecto de Suecia y los Estados Unidos, está moviendo todos los resortes para acabar con una situación que políticamente le perjudica.

http://is.gd/GGhZUk
http://www.abc.net.au/4corners/stories/2012/07/19/3549280.htm
http://justice4assange.com
http://www.alexaobrien.com/secondsight/wikileaks/grand_jury/

2012-07-24 WikiLeaks News Update: WikiLeaks releases still considered classified by US; New Assange TV special


WikiLeaks has been financially blockaded without process for 598 days.
Julian Assange has been detained without charge for 595 days.
- 35 days at the Ecuadorian Embassy.
Bradley Manning has been imprisoned without trial for 792 days.
A secret Grand Jury has been active in the U.S. without transparency for 678 days.


WikiLeaks News:

  • In a recent case involving the ACLU, the US Government has won the right to act as though cables released by WikiLeaks are still classified. Previously, the ACLU had requested cables made public by WikiLeaks under the Freedom of Information Act, only to receive them redacted in part or full.
  • EFF's Trevor Timm wrote on how the WikiLeaks Grand Jury is so dangerous, as we now see members of Congress wanting to prosecute journalists at The New York Times for reporting on classified information.
  • Tunisian human rights campaigner Sami Ben Gharbia appeared on ABC Lateline to discuss WikiLeaks, social media, and the Arab Spring uprising.
  • ABC RadioNational Law Report has audio and transcript of their discussion on the WikiLeaks Grand Jury and whether Julian Assange's concern over it is justified. The discussion features Anita Barraud, Professor David Weisbrot, and Professor Larry Siegel.


Julian Assange News:

  • ABC Four Corners aired a new special, "Sex, Lies, and Julian Assange", which focused on the sexual misconduct allegations against Mr Assange and his legal battles. The full episode, transcript, and extended interviews with Mr Assange, Per E Samuelson, Claes Borgström, and Birgitta Jónsdóttir are available on the Four Corners website. (Also mirrored on YouTube.)
  • In a new interview from "Sex, Lies, and Julian Assange", Mr Assange explained that a major part in his decision to seek asylum was due to a late-night visit on the night the UK Supreme Court rejected to reopen his case by the security contractor who maintained the electronic manacle around his ankle.

    Another reason was that the 14-day period he was supposed to have in order to appeal to the European Court of Human Rights was reduced to zero.

  • Justice for Assange posted a "Declaration of Abandonment" from the Australian Government in which they denied all 16 requests for assistance from Julian Assange's lawyer Gareth Pierce in full. The requests included assurances against U.S. extradition and, if extradited to Sweden, being held in similar conditions as he was held under in the UK.

Image

  • Mark Weisbrot, co-director of the Center for Economic and Policy Research, wrote an op-ed in The Guardian which discusses how free speech advocates should be supporting Julian Assange's asylum bid, not inventing a media crackdown in Ecuador.
  • Australian lawyers for Julian Assange sent a letter to the federal government warning that Mr Assange would almost certainly be indicted by the U.S. if sent to Sweden, and would then face similar treatment to that of Bradley Manning. Crikey's Bernard Keane wrote on the response to this letter, which included a point blank refusal to answer certain questions from the acting Attorney-General Jason Clare.
  • Suelette Dreyfus wrote an article about how she got to know Julian Assange, the sexual misconduct allegations against him, and the importance of WikiLeaks' revelations.
  • WL Central has posted a new interview with Christine Assange in which she discusses the current status of WikiLeaks and her son, and what people can do to help.
  • Giant chalk-art supporting Julian Assange in his bid for asylum was created during "Chalkupy" at Occupy Oakland.
  • Ecuadorian newspaper El Telégrafo has a webpage dedicated to WikiLeaks, Julian Assange, and his bid for asylum. They also have a counter on their front page for days since he entered the Ecuadorian Embassy.
  • WikiLeaks asked that those who know Olympians have them come to the Ecuadorian Embassy and help bring awareness to Julian Assange's plight.
  • Actor Jeremy Renner is looking into playing Julian Assange in the upcoming WikiLeaks film produced by DreamWorks.


Bradley Manning News:

  • The Bradley Manning Support Network published an article previewing Bradley's upcoming August 27-31 hearings, which will focus on his treatment at Quantico Marine Base.
  • The Alyona Show reported on the latest developments in Bradley Manning's case. Watch the segment below.
  • Legal experts say that the latest ruling in Bradley Manning's motion hearings to prevent discussion of harm could hurt the defence's case.
  • The Bradley Manning Support Network is calling on people to take action in support of Bradley and WikiLeaks on July 25, the second anniversary of the release of the Afghan War Logs.
  • Author Dave Lefcourt wrote an op-ed about the lack of actual "justice" Bradley Manning is receiving in his legal proceedings.



............................................

Upcoming Dates & Events:

July 25: Action Day - Second anniversary of Afghan War Logs.

July 26: WikiLeaks unlawfully financially blockaded for 600 days.

July 29: Julian Assange detained for 600 days without charge.

July 31: Bradley Manning in jail for 800 days without trial.

August 26: Manning lawyer David Coombs to speak in Washington DC.

August 27 - 31: Bradley Manning pre-trial hearings.

September 13: Bradley Manning pre-trial hearings.

November 2012 ~ January 2013: Estimated time frame for Bradley Manning's court martial.

2012-07-25 My thoughts about the Baltasar Garzón/Julian Assange Teamup

By Nikolas Kozloff.

On a certain level, I wonder whether Baltasar Garzón, the Spanish judge who is now defending WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange, agreed to take the assignment for personal reasons.

In recent years, Garzón has come to international attention for pursuing a number of high profile international cases. In 1998 for example, the judge sought to apprehend brutal Chilean dictator Augusto Pinochet, Washington's ally during the Cold War. Not stopping there, the pugnacious judge issued an order for British authorities to detain Henry Kissinger no less.

But what really seems to have raised the ire of the U.S. was Garzón's attempt to indict six former Bush officials for crimes against humanity, including Bush Attorney General Alberto Gonzales, John Yoo (Justice Department Office of Legal Counsel), Douglas Feith (Undersecretary of Defense for Policy), William Hayne (Donald Rumsfeld's Chief Counsel), Jay Bybee (Justice Department Office of Legal Counsel), and David Addington (Dick Cheney's Chief of Staff).

The Bush 6 constituted a legal team which authorized torture at Guantánamo Bay, Cuba and elsewhere. One might think, on the surface at least, that the incoming Obama administration would want to bring these figures to justice. However, WikiLeaks cables reveal to the contrary that Obama officials pressured to have Garzón removed from the Bush 6 case, which was ultimately dismissed.

If that was not bad enough, cables also reveal that the U.S. pressured the Spanish government to have Garzón drop his investigation into the death of a Spanish journalist who was killed by US shelling in Baghdad. Moreover, Garzón was obliged to abandon efforts to get to the bottom of allegations made by Spanish Guantánamo detainees that they had been tortured. The intrepid Garzón had also sought to investigate the use of Spanish bases for CIA "rendition" flights, which resulted in suspects being transported to third countries which practiced torture. Once again, according to WikiLeaks cables, Garzón was obliged to cease and desist from his important legal work.

Perhaps, as a result of these WikiLeaks disclosures, Garzón feels a certain degree of personal solidarity with Julian Assange. Having irked the powers that be in Washington once before, the Spanish judge is now entering the public spotlight once again.

2012-07-26 WikiLeaks News Update: Baltasar Garzón joins WikiLeaks legal team; Cables used in UK court case


WikiLeaks has been financially blockaded without process for 600 days.
Julian Assange has been detained without charge for 597 days.
- 37 days at the Ecuadorian Embassy.
Bradley Manning has been imprisoned without trial for 794 days.
A secret Grand Jury has been active in the U.S. without transparency for 680 days.


WikiLeaks News:

  • July 25 marked two years since WikiLeaks' release of the Afghan War Diary. Firedoglake's Kevin Gosztola wrote a piece for the anniversary, commenting on what they revealed and the recent developments in research.

Image

  • WikiLeaks issued a press release announcing that Spanish judge, lawyer, and international jurist, Baltasar Garzón will be leading the legal team representing WikiLeaks and Julian Assange. He met with Mr Assange at the Ecuadorian Embassy in London to discuss new legal strategies about the existing abuse of process, the financial blockade, and how secret U.S. processes have contaminated other legal processes.
    • Judge Garzón is the one who issued the extradition request for Augusto Pinochet, while Clare Montgomery, the current lead prosecutor for UK/Sweden against Mr Assange, represented Pinochet.
    • Judge Garzón will be a keynote speaker on "Truth, Justice, and Reparation" at ICA 2012 in Brisbane, 23 August at 9AM.
    • 50 diplomatic cables released by WikiLeaks mention Judge Garzón.
    • In recent interviews, Judge Garzón stated he would insist on Julian Assange receiving a fair trial and that it does not seem right that he is "under such pressure from governments".
    • RT reported on the addition of Baltasar Garzón to WikiLeaks' legal team and the implications it carries.
  • A judge has ordered that two UK Government officials be questioned over WikiLeaks cables regarding the exile of Indian Ocean islanders. This is the first time WikiLeaks cables have been featured in a UK court case.
  • Privacy International is preparing to take legal action against the UK Government for failing to control exports of spy technology to brutal regimes, which is detailed in WikiLeaks' Spy Files.
  • The New York Times' Bill Keller, known as a major critic of Julian Assange, discussed why we should defend WikiLeaks and the fact that it is protected under the First Amendment.
  • Jesselyn Radack of the Government Accountability Project was on RT to discuss the war on whistleblowers, the WikiLeaks Grand Jury, and the threat of U.S. extradition for Julian Assange. Watch the interview below.
  • The White House recently stated that President Obama has "no tolerance for leaks" of national security information.
  • Firedoglake's Kevin Gosztola wrote on the U.S. Senate's proposal for curbing leaks and how it escalates restrictions on intelligence employees who talk to the media.

Image

  • An article at TechDirt discusses how the U.S. Government is living in a "fantasy land" by continuing to consider WikiLeaks releases as classified.
  • SomersetBean has began a WikiLeaks street art project entitled "The Stencil Files". Two different WikiLeaks logo stencil designs are currently available at his blog.


Julian Assange News:

  • Ecuador's Foreign Minister Ricardo Patino stated his Government's decision on Julian Assange's asylum would come after the Olympics end (August 12) and would not affect relations with the UK. He also welcomed Baltasar Garzón's involvement with Julian Assange's legal matters, as the Ecuadorian Government had a "a very good relationship" with Garzón.
  • Australian Labor MP Melissa Parke called on U.S. Attorney-General Eric Holder to make a categorical statement that the U.S. was not seeking the extradition and prosecution of Julian Assange.

Image

  • Masked supporters of Julian Assange attended Ecuadorian President Rafael Correa's community meeting, holding up signs and calling for his acceptance into asylum. Graffiti in support of Mr Assange has been spotted around Quito, with messages such as "Julian Assange is coming!"
      • Mary Kostakidis wrote an op-ed which comments on the "willful blindness" by the Australian Government regarding Julian Assange and David Hicks.


      Bradley Manning News:

      • The Bradley Manning Support Network issued a news update for July 25 which covers the anniversary of the Afghan War Logs and Oakland protests for Bradley, and a news update for July 24 which covers the implications of Manning’s trial, a rally at Ft. Leavenworth, and the government’s illogical secrecy.
      • Jeff Patterson of Courage to Resist and the Bradley Manning Support Network put out a statement on Bradley's gender identity:

        All supportive individuals who have had direct contact with Bradley since his arrest over two years ago--referred to below as "friends, family, and legal defense team"--agree that the following statement is both accurate and appropriate:
        "Everything we know from Bradley Manning's friends, family, and legal defense team, is that he wishes to be referred to as Brad or Bradley until he's able to get to the next stage of his life. Bradley has indicated that he's not interested in publicly addressing this issue."

      • A supporter of Bradley Manning has hung up a sign on their home which states, "Want my vote? Free Bradley Manning".



      ............................................

      Upcoming Dates & Events:

      July 26: WikiLeaks unlawfully financially blockaded for 600 days.

      July 29: Julian Assange detained for 600 days without charge.

      July 31: Bradley Manning in jail for 800 days without trial.

      August 12: Assange asylum decision not expected until after this date.

      August 26: Manning lawyer David Coombs to speak in Washington DC.

      August 27 - 31: Bradley Manning pre-trial hearings.

      September 13: Bradley Manning pre-trial hearings.

      November 2012 ~ January 2013: Estimated time frame for Bradley Manning's court martial.

2012-07-29 The undermining of Canadian values in the delay to approve transfer of Omar Khadr

The Minister of Public Safety in Canada, Vic Toews, recently made comments about Omar Khadr's potential transfer to Canada from Guantánamo Bay, where he has been incarcerated since 2002 when he was just 15 years old. The comment by Toews comes after the US formally requested a transfer in April of 2012, and after months of silence and inaction. Omar Khadr pleaded guilty in Guantánamo in 2010 to five charges. Under a plea deal, Khadr had his sentence reduced from 40 to 8 years. Such a transfer would allow Omar Khadr to serve the remainder of his sentence in Canada.

On July 16, Toews stated "I'm not going to make any decisions that would in any way jeopardize public safety." The statement comes after delays from the Canadian Government in response to the US Government's request for transfer. The government is now demanding the Pentagon hand over unredacted Khadr interviews conducted by Dr Michael Welner, a psychiatrist who has gained controversial status in the Khadr case. His reports are at odds with three others who paint a much different image of Khadr. Welner's questionable conclusions have been well-dissected by Thomas Walkom, a columnist for The Star.

Vic Toews as a federal minister, has a responsibility that extends past the duties of public safety: to allow a Canadian citizen to spend the rest of his sentence on Canadian soil, instead of the clutches of American "justice" in Guantánamo.

Guantánamo Bay's reputation precedes it. Incarceration without charge and abuses that occurred in the prison are well-documented. In April 2011, WikiLeaks published files on Guantánamo detainees, (including Khadr) shedding light on the practices of the institution. Khadr has not escaped this, and though the Canadian government was well aware of the abuses as early as 2003.

Canada's reputation on human rights has thus far been largely unaffected amongst the international community. Recent cases however, may challenge that stature. A UN report published in January 2012 alleges complicity by Canada in the case of Maher Arar, a Canadian-Syrian citizen rendered to Syria for torture (item 25 in the UN Report). The same report also makes reference to Khadr and his lawyers being denied process and information (item 26). Canada's inaction was embarrassed further when a US Cable published by WikiLeaks revealed former Foreign Minister of France, Bernard Kouchner, asked for "assistance" in the case of Omar Khadr.

Furthermore, the Supreme Court of Canada upheld 9-0 a lower court ruling that Khadr's rights were violated and that he was entitled to remedy from the government. A ruling that was subsequently ignored and thus far not been acted upon.

If Canada wants to be seen as a law-abiding, peace keeping nation, it must approve the transfer of Khadr immediately. In general, us Canadians like to think of ourselves as a nation that embodies our Charter of Rights and that we live in a place where it is unheard of for that Charter to be abused. A delay like this, to keep one of our citizens (guilty or not) in Guantánamo Bay, undermines our values as a democracy: showing blatant disregard for our citizens.

The most un-Canadian thing Minister Vic Toews can do is to reject the opportunity to transfer Omar Khadr, and knowingly keep a Canadian citizen in Guantánamo Bay. Though Toews argues he cannot yet make a decision on the transfer because of "safety concerns" which stem from Dr Welner's interviews, he has the remainder of Khadr's sentence to contemplate a public safety plan for his eventual freedom. Canada has an obligation to stand firm on our values, and to remove Khadr from Guantánamo Bay, a prison synonymous with torture and blatantly flaunting international law and human rights.

2012-07-30 WikiLeaks: Activist or Journalist? Pulling a Yes Men on Bill Keller

On Saturday evening, what appeared to be a New York Times op-ed piece by Bill Keller supporting WikiLeaks emerged on twitter. For WL supporters, this was too good to be true, as someone who had shown much animosity toward WikiLeaks appeared to be speaking in their defense. This turned out to be a well crafted hoax. The stunning prank was believed by almost everyone as the only difference was the URL. The article borrowed words from Keller's emails and mimicked New York Times' home page. It fooled journalists and embarrassingly even the Time's tech writer Nick Bilton. It was surreal, as Keller, someone who had come to represent a 'journalism' that bends over for the US government, now appeared to stand behind WikiLeaks. This lasted for hours before it was finally debunked. Later in the day, WikiLeaks released a sequence of tweets that admitted they were involved in the production of this fake Bill Keller op-ed.

Shortly after the revelation of the hoax by WikiLeaks, some people expressed dismay, saying that they may have damaged their own credibility by crafting this prank. Salon blogger and lawyer Green Gleenwald wrote a piece highlighting the strength of the Internet in correcting errors, using the original debunking of this article as an example. Later in an update, he expressed his ambivalent reaction to WikiLeaks's claim of responsibility for it:

"I don't know if this claim of responsibility is true or not. Either way, it doesn't strike me as a good idea for a group that relies on its credibility when it comes to the authenticity of what they publish - and which thus far has had a stellar record in that regard - to be making boastful claims that they published forged documents. I understand and appreciate the satire, but in this case, it directly conflicts with, and undermines, the primary value of WikiLeaks."

But let's look more closely at Gleenwald's reaction here. Does this hoax really discredit WikiLeaks's work and betray the organization's values?

WikiLeaks first emerged onto the global stage with its release of the Collateral Murder video in April 2010. At that time, the sensational title Collateral Murder triggered unfavorable reactions. The political slant created through the naming of the video was seen by some as an act of editorializing at best and blatant manipulation of perception. Critics referred to a supposed journalistic ethos of unbiased or balanced reporting and portrayed WikiLeaks as violating it.

WikiLeaks engages in scientific journalism. Their leaked documents have an impeccable record of authenticity. They also have never failed to protect the anonymity of their sources. They have claimed all along to be a journalistic entity. In looking back, we can see that not only are they journalists, but they have released more scoops than all established media institutions combined. Bill Keller himself in the past has openly admitted that WikiLeaks is practicing journalism, but a type that differs greatly from traditional forms like the New York Times.

In addition to WikiLeaks' purpose of publishing complete, authenticated documents, their other role should not be forgotten. "We are an activist organization. The method is transparency. The goal is justice" said Assange (April 18, 2010). This organization, with honest, upfront disclosure of their agenda employs the creed of transparency which allows them to connect with what has become taboo in conventional journalism, passion for justice and an openly stated ethos of responsibility.

For instance, in the context of their leaks, publishing all source material keeps journalism more honest and situates the events in a more open forum. When disclosure of motives that framed the conclusion is made immediately available to the public, people can participate effectively in the process of forming perception. "Because Assange publishes the full source material, he believes that WikiLeaks is free to offer its analysis, no matter how speculative" (as cited in Khatchadourian, 2010). Only when this scientific approach is taken along with full disclosure of one's intentions does a space open up for true editorial freedom. This freedom allows one to move into the subjective field with integrity. In the case of titling the gunship video, Assange was upfront about the motives behind it. He spoke how WikiLeaks wanted "to knock out this 'collateral damage' euphemism, so when anyone uses it they will think 'collateral murder'" (as cited in Khatchadourian, 2010).

With honest disclosure, political slant becomes a sort of creative license. Their creative titling of the video at that time was meant to combat the official military narrative and it's Orwellian euphemism. The recent Bill Keller hoax was implemented to highlight the hypocrisy of the New York Times and bring attention to their silence on the corporate banking blockade of WikiLeaks. It was also created as a direct message to the New York Times and Keller's silent complicity with the US government and private companies like PayPal attacking the First Amendment. With major influential media, silence itself can mean complicity. Within 24 hours of their action, WikiLeaks disclosed their responsibility for the fake op-ed and said why they did it. How long did it take for the New York Times to take responsibility for the WMD lie they disseminated that led to the deaths of millions in Iraq? - They never really did. It is always important to put things in context.

On Twittersphere, some recognized this current WL stunt as art of political activism. Back in 2008, the Yes Men, Andy Bichlbaum and Mike Bonanno, pulled a prank of writing a spoof edition of the New York Times. They wanted to show what real change could look like. They set it 6 months ahead to show what would happen if people's imaginations were freed. The headline of the spoof announced the end of the Iraq War. It was printed in a form that was so high quality it successfully fooled many New Yorkers.

A creative surrealistic act can for a moment open people's minds and effectively bring attention to issues that are obfuscated or ignored by the mainstream media. Like the Yes Men's creative stunt, WikiLeaks' fake op-ed falls in the category of creative activism. It is important to note that this is not in any way related to their release of documents. It is the art of satire with a touch of surrealism that temporarily twists reality to engage the public in thinking about the world in a different way. In a sense, it is no different than an op-ed. Yet, with this they used an unwitting New York Times as a vehicle to make a powerful statement.

Some see this kind of act as a creative deed, while others might disapprove. Perhaps WikiLeaks is ushering in a new form of journalism that is more decentralized and interactive. They show us that writers too can connect with their passion and invite the world to imagine a different reality. Their innovative style also is a way of staying true to the original role of the media, that of calling truth to power. Only now WikiLeaks also is performing as a watch dog to the established media. If journalists betray their true profession according to the First Amendment, it appears that now on the Internet they can be called out for it. Is WikiLeaks an activist or a journalistic organization? By their own admission, they are both.

2012-07-31 Christine Assange Meets Ecuador's Foreign Minister

UPDATE BELOW: In the Ecuadorian capital of Quito today, Christine Assange struggled to hold back tears after a meeting with Ricardo Patiño, Ecuador's Minister for Foreign Relations, Business and Integration.

While WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange remains trapped in Ecuador's London embassy, his mother has flown to the small South American capital to provide additional information on his request for political asylum, and make a personal plea for assistance.

At a press conference following today's meeting, Christine Assange thanked the Foreign Minister and the government of Ecuador "for paying attention to the information I have given, which is more than my own government will do."

Mrs Assange claimed the Australian government has abandoned her son, and reiterated her fears for his safety if he is extradited to the USA. She explained how the US Grand Jury process worked, and cited the treatment of Bradley Manning as an example of what her son could expect. She told local media that the current situation is not just about WikiLeaks, but also about justice and the future of press freedom.

The meeting was briefly halted when Mrs Assange was overcome with emotion, after beginning to explain to a reporter why she preferred to focus on the facts of the case rather than her own experiences.

Tapped phones, death threats

According to Ecuador's El Telegrafo newspaper, Mrs Assange revealed that her phones are tapped, her 21-year-old grandson has had death threats, her father is dying and might not be able to see Julian before he dies, and the family is suffering symptoms of chronic stress.

Mrs Assange earlier said she was "terrified" by the thought of US extradition and that her son was "under extreme psychological stress" while confined to the Ecuadorian embassy.

"He is freedom-loving. He cannot run. He cannot go outside to see the sky. Outside, the UK police wait like dogs to take him."

"I am not here to demand asylum," she said. "I come to humbly ask, as his mother."

Foreign Minister Ricardo Patiño said he was "very surprised" by the information he had received from Mrs Assange, including details of processes "that could be underway in America" and alleged torture of Australian citizens in Guantanamo Bay.

Mr Patiño also revealed that the Ecuadorian embassy in Sweden has asked the Swedish government to come to London if they want to question the WikiLeaks Editor-in-Chief.

"Ecuador continues its thorough analysis of this case in order to take an informed decision. Our decision will seek not to endanger the life of a human being," Patiño said.

"I am sure the president and his aides will make the best decision in this case," said Mrs Assange.

Christine Assange is scheduled to meet with President Rafael Correa before departing on August 4th. As a gesture of respect to Britain, no decision on asylum is expected before the Olympic Games finish on August 12th.

You can see video of Mrs Assange's press conference with Mr Patiño here.

Note: Reports that Christine said that Julian Assange's Australian passport has been cancelled appear to be due to bad translations. The 41-year-old's passport was confiscated by UK police when he was arrested two years ago.

UPDATE:

WikiLeaks has tweeted that Sweden has rejected the request to interview Julian Assange in the UK.

Ecuador's Ministry of Foreign Relations issued a statement on the meeting with Christine Assage. Google translation here.

It is also worth nothing that two tweets from @CancilleriaEc, which live-tweeted the press conference, were later deleted. These tweets described comments by Christine Assange that were critical of the Swedish media and Swedish prison system.